Alright so Jim Osborne claims that the earth is flat and lists off three of the crappiest arguments I have ever seen. here are his 3:
1. earth rotates very fast, so if you jump you should land far away
2. a piece of paper doesnt stick to the bottom of a balloon so how could people in australia stick to the bottom of the earth (absolutely hilarious argument LOL)
3. as you get higher you can see more into the distance, but if the earth were curved there would be a point where you could not see anymore.
Let's take apart these arguments because they are absolutely atrocious and indicative of an absolute lack of basic logic skills.
1. There is a very easy response to be made here but I must first understand whether you want to grant that gravity does indeed exist or if you want to resort to unverifiable biblical information that holds no weight in your "3" counterarguments.
2. This argument is just false. the weight of a balloon relative to a piece of paper is not HUGE. helium's weight is basically negligible. the gravitational force here is NOT comparable WHATSOEVER to the gravitational force of something as heavy as the earth on the weight of a puny person. Moreover, the equation for gravitional force is F = G*m1*m2/r^2, where G is the gravitional constant. even if one's weight is not considerably greater than the other's, the weight of a balloon and a small piece of paper is so little that the numerator will be too small to produce a large value for F. Compare to that the ENORMOUS weight of the earth which will, no matter what, produce a large value for F.
3. Is this argument a joke? Start thinking about how light hits your eyes moron. Earth is curved but the light hits your eyes at an angle such that it seems flat to you. So as you climb higher and higher, yes you will see more and you will not see a point where nothing else is visible because the light hitting those things just "over the curve" hits your eyes in such a fashion that it appears flat to you. Honestly, has anyone here taken an introductory course in physics in their LIVES? this is basic optics people.
1. earth rotates very fast, so if you jump you should land far away
2. a piece of paper doesnt stick to the bottom of a balloon so how could people in australia stick to the bottom of the earth (absolutely hilarious argument LOL)
3. as you get higher you can see more into the distance, but if the earth were curved there would be a point where you could not see anymore.
Let's take apart these arguments because they are absolutely atrocious and indicative of an absolute lack of basic logic skills.
1. There is a very easy response to be made here but I must first understand whether you want to grant that gravity does indeed exist or if you want to resort to unverifiable biblical information that holds no weight in your "3" counterarguments.
2. This argument is just false. the weight of a balloon relative to a piece of paper is not HUGE. helium's weight is basically negligible. the gravitational force here is NOT comparable WHATSOEVER to the gravitational force of something as heavy as the earth on the weight of a puny person. Moreover, the equation for gravitional force is F = G*m1*m2/r^2, where G is the gravitional constant. even if one's weight is not considerably greater than the other's, the weight of a balloon and a small piece of paper is so little that the numerator will be too small to produce a large value for F. Compare to that the ENORMOUS weight of the earth which will, no matter what, produce a large value for F.
3. Is this argument a joke? Start thinking about how light hits your eyes moron. Earth is curved but the light hits your eyes at an angle such that it seems flat to you. So as you climb higher and higher, yes you will see more and you will not see a point where nothing else is visible because the light hitting those things just "over the curve" hits your eyes in such a fashion that it appears flat to you. Honestly, has anyone here taken an introductory course in physics in their LIVES? this is basic optics people.
Comment