[MitzaLizalor]

.im christian and i listen to mcr? does this make me bad now ig

WHY ROMANCING WITH CHEMICALS MAKES YOU A BAD PERSON

Firstly, as has been observed before, it is absolutely impossible that anyone identifying themselves as having a “romance” with “chemicals” could be anything but demonic. Are you suggesting that the name of this band derives from anything other than consumption of illicit drugs? What else could it be? A rodenticide salesman fallen in love with a box of rat poison? I don’t think so. For heathens however there is little reason to avoid chemical intoxication. I've underlined the root of that word for a reason. Use of multiple chemicals would enhance the “romance” element I guess but is spiritually toxic. Remember, not all Christians led pristine lives before responding to Jesus. We are not your dumb parents for whom random drivel passes as an excuse. Oh is it darling? they may say. Of course you can go to the MCR concert pass my plastic and would you like some spending money. Little do they know, but we know because some of us were there too.

I CORINTHIANS 6 .KJV
19 What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own?

Obviously every baby, every infant, deserves torture. Torture in perpetuity. That means from birth, even from conception, and that means you Abigail. When Jesus calls, not off his onion looking for the “chemical romance” and certain to get it if he hands over a bag dodgy-looking crystals but in humility and self sacrifice, we have answered.

Yes, Jesus, I will be yours .is a simple and humbling response. He was tortured instead of me. Now I am His.

I CORINTHIANS 6 .KJV
20 For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God's.

Godless wretches often say to me Babies deserve torture? Infants should be tormented across a sea of everlasting time? and the answer is very simple. If it were not so, from what did Jesus save us? If there was no Eve, no abrupt descent into the filth of sin, no transmission through Adam to all her progeny, why would Jesus be needed at all? And if He were not needed would He even be born, either here or in the Celestial realm? It was for us He bled and died. But in your “chemical romance” paradigm, the rut is probably as good as it gets. Well, let's face it, the rut on chemicals is a heightened romance isn't it.

I CORINTHIANS 6 .KJV
13 Meats for the belly, and the belly for meats: but God shall destroy both it and them. Now the body is not for fornication, but for the Lord; and the Lord for the body.
14 And God hath both raised up the Lord, and will also raise up us by his own power.
15 Know ye not that your bodies are the members of Christ? shall I then take the members of Christ, and make them the members of an harlot? God forbid.
16 What? know ye not that he which is joined to an harlot is one body? for two, saith he, shall be one flesh.

Christians have been delivered from and never think about this garbage. We have been delivered from filthiness, to whatever extent we ever engaged in it, and are now sin free. Praise Jesus! In the secular world it's quite different. And that's why we keep responding to posters like abigailxx .. yes, she's been banned and The Pastors know why, yet others will read her comment and wonder Yes! No! Why shouldn't I listen to the MCR? Here and throughout the thread, reasons are presented. Jesus is the answer. Chemicals are not.

I CORINTHIANS 6 .KJV . whole passage in context
17 But he that is joined unto the Lord is one spirit.
18 Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Originally Posted by MitzaLizalor

Godless wretches often say to me Babies deserve torture? Infants should be tormented across a sea of everlasting time? and the answer is very simple. If it were not so, from what did Jesus save us? If there was no Eve, no abrupt descent into the filth of sin, no transmission through Adam to all her progeny, why would Jesus be needed at all? And if He were not needed would He even be born, either here or in the Celestial realm? It was for us He bled and died. But in your “chemical romance” paradigm, the rut is probably as good as it gets. Well, let's face it, the rut on chemicals is a heightened romance isn't it.

I CORINTHIANS 6 .KJV
13 Meats for the belly, and the belly for meats: but God shall destroy both it and them. Now the body is not for fornication, but for the Lord; and the Lord for the body.
14 And God hath both raised up the Lord, and will also raise up us by his own power.
15 Know ye not that your bodies are the members of Christ? shall I then take the members of Christ, and make them the members of an harlot? God forbid.
16 What? know ye not that he which is joined to an harlot is one body? for two, saith he, shall be one flesh

Your entire post is remarkable in its ability to show the power of the Gospel in such a succinct, and yet personal way, but this bit right here really brought tears to my eyes. I defy any rational person to find a reason to disagree with this.

[Vantheman4321]

Originally Posted by Didymus Much

Why not use the break to read the Bible so you actually know what you're rejecting?

Hello!

I'm back, and that's what I've done


Anyway, I'd just like to say that the name, "My Chemical Romance" does not refer to drugs like people said. After some research, I discovered it was chosen by a guitarist , and was named after/inspired by the title of a book he saw.

[MitzaLizalor]

Originally Posted by Vantheman4321

Hello!

I'm back, and that's what I've done


Anyway, I'd just like to say that the name, "My Chemical Romance" does not refer to drugs like people said. After some research, I discovered it was chosen by a guitarist , and was named after/inspired by the title of a book he saw.

That's interesting. What was the book about?

[Vantheman4321]

Originally Posted by MitzaLizalor

That's interesting. What was the book about?

He actually never read the book. He just liked the name.

[Vantheman4321]

Originally Posted by MitzaLizalor

That's interesting. What was the book about?

And credit where credit is due,


Your post explaining why Romancing with Chemicals is bad was very detailed and made sense, though it's incorrect.


I 100 percent see what you mean, but it has nothing to do with drugs.

[MitzaLizalor]

Originally Posted by Vantheman4321

And credit where credit is due,


Your post explaining why Romancing with Chemicals is bad was very detailed and made sense, though it's incorrect.


I 100 percent see what you mean, but it has nothing to do with drugs.

Excerpts from the book should be easy to find. The "..Chemical Romances" bit is a sub-title, incidentally. The author is Irvine Welsh. Perhaps a quick read will indicate what informed my post.

[Diesel Stanford]

Jesus' favorite band is Stryper. Even though Jesus actually did not have long hair.

But the Holy Spirit told me that MCR's music is deception.

[Vantheman4321]

Originally Posted by Didymus Much

You haven't even tried to. You've presented nothing but assertions of your own beliefs

I could say the same to you.

[Vantheman4321]

Originally Posted by Didymus Much

Scripture or STFU, thanks.

Revelation 22:19 "And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, andfrom the things which are written in this book."

If you would like to give some reasons other than "Stfu," I should be able to make an argument against 'em. Ill be waiting!

I want to be clear,
I AM NOT ATTACKING YOUR FAITH.

[Elmer G. White]

Originally Posted by Vantheman4321

I could say the same to you.

Dear Van the Sinner,

This uttering of yours is just a tu quoque fallacy. Instead of (finally) engaging in a conversation about the actual content of this thread (the Bible and Jesus), you're simply trying to turn the tables on your interlocutor. Even if Mr. Much is a vile atheist sinner, it is his arguments that you should be assessing. The tu quoque entails that if you're wrong, your position remains wrong even if someone else is also wrong. That other person's position can be assessed independent of yours (and, in the case of Mr. Much, Jesus will eventually take care of that; Revelation 20:13; Glory to that).

Originally Posted by Vantheman4321

If you would like to give some reasons other than "Stfu," I should be able to make an argument against 'em. Ill be waiting!

I want to be clear,
I AM NOT ATTACKING YOUR FAITH.

I do admit that it is mildly entertaining to see two atheists fighting on a True Christian™ forum, it also makes Jesus sad. Of course you're not attacking Mr. Much's Faith® as he has none. It is still unclear why our repeated attempts to ban him have failed - most likely because Jesus still has some great plans for him. Perhaps for you,too.

Actually, Mr. Much has realized that to make a meaningful conversation on God's Favorite Forum, you should use arguments that Jesus accepts. Within our context they are the only ones that matter. They can be found in the Bible. As Mr. Much understands this, he has actually studied the Bible. We are positive that in due course it will bring about a nice conversion into Fundamentalist True Christianity™. As you might realize by now, it is not enough to believe, you must also believe in the correct manner.

2 Peter 2:1
But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.

These false teachers include, e.g., gamers, Catholics, CoE, etc.


Yours in Christ,

Elmer

[Vantheman4321]

Originally Posted by Elmer G. White

Dear Van the Sinner,

This uttering of yours is just a tu quoque fallacy. Instead of (finally) engaging in a conversation about the actual content of this thread (the Bible and Jesus), you're simply trying to turn the tables on your interlocutor. Even if Mr. Much is a vile atheist sinner, it is his arguments that you should be assessing. The tu quoque entails that if you're wrong, your position remains wrong even if someone else is also wrong. That other person's position can be assessed independent of yours (and, in the case of Mr. Much, Jesus will eventually take care of that; Revelation 20:13; Glory to that).

I do admit that it is mildly entertaining to see two atheists fighting on a True Christian™ forum, it also makes Jesus sad. Of course you're not attacking Mr. Much's Faith® as he has none. It is still unclear why our repeated attempts to ban him have failed - most likely because Jesus still has some great plans for him. Perhaps for you,too.

Actually, Mr. Much has realized that to make a meaningful conversation on God's Favorite Forum, you should use arguments that Jesus accepts. Within our context they are the only ones that matter. They can be found in the Bible. As Mr. Much understands this, he has actually studied the Bible. We are positive that in due course it will bring about a nice conversion into Fundamentalist True Christianity™. As you might realize by now, it is not enough to believe, you must also believe in the correct manner.

2 Peter 2:1
But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.

These false teachers include, e.g., gamers, Catholics, CoE, etc.


Yours in Christ,

Elmer

MESSAGE I GOT -
-----------------
Dear Vantheman4321,

You have received an infraction at The Landover Baptist Church Forum.

Reason: Debating Other unsaved trash instead of praising Jesus®
--------------------


Why, on earth, am i getting a strike for that?

[Dr Laurence Niles]

Originally Posted by Vantheman4321

MESSAGE I GOT -
-----------------
Dear Vantheman4321,

You have received an infraction at The Landover Baptist Church Forum.

Reason: Debating Other unsaved trash instead of praising Jesus®
--------------------


Why, on earth, am i getting a strike for that?

Young lady, if you do not wish to discuss how great Jesus is exactly why are you here?

YIC

[Dana723]

Originally Posted by Diesel Stanford

Jesus' favorite band is Stryper. Even though Jesus actually did not have long hair.

But the Holy Spirit told me that MCR's music is deception.

Do you have some quotes from the Bible to back that up?

[ExGayJustin]

mcr is not my favorite band and they did a lot wrong to my rectum

[Didymus Much]

Originally Posted by ExGayJustin

mcr is not my favorite band and they did a lot wrong to my rectum

That's why they're boring.


Real rock stars abuse everyone (esp. themselves) and fuq shit up.


MCR's prolly driving minivans now.

[ExGayJustin]

Originally Posted by Didymus Much

That's why they're boring.


Real rock stars abuse everyone (esp. themselves) and fuq shit up.


MCR's prolly driving minivans now.

real rockstars respect people

[Didymus Much]

Originally Posted by ExGayJustin

real rockstars respect people

You're looking for heroes and catchy tunes about the very real issues today's suburban teenagers face.


I'm looking for art. Art smells bad and rarely smiles. If it does, it means it's about to spit in your face.

[MitzaLizalor]

So you're saying, this [BELOW] is not art?