Plate Tectonics – Another Scientific Theory DESTROYED!

[Pim Pendergast]

Questionable Origins

Continental drift theory was invented in 1912 by Alfred Wegener. The theory was regarded with skepticism for decades, as Wegener wasn’t even a qualified geologist. It was eventually rejected, tossed onto the scrapheap of other failed scientific theories like alchemical transmutation, in the late 1950’s in favor of plate tectonics, which also teaches that the continents drift.


Pangaea

Plate tectonicists believe all the earth’s continents were once joined together in a supercontinent called Pangaea. Here’s their proof:

All the continents fit perfectly together… if you distort their shapes and leave gaps in between them and put Antarctica north of Australia and turn Australia upside down and put India next to Africa and join Alaska onto Russia and separate Eurasia and Africa. This is called confirmation bias, making the evidence fit the conclusion.

If all the continents were once joined together, we would expect to see the same animals on every continent. Instead, we find kangaroos only in Australia and tigers only in Asia. This is exactly what we would expect if God had created life uniquely for each continent (and restored each continent’s unique life again after the Flood). But if the continents were once joined, there would have been nothing to prevent each kind of animal from spreading all over the earth.

Given that the earth is flat, how did Antarctica manage to break up and encircle the earth?

Earthquakes and Volcanos

In an attempt to remove God from the equation, plate tectonicists attribute earthquakes and volcanos to natural phenomena and not to God, as the Bible teaches. God used a volcanic eruption to destroy Sodom and Gomorrah (Gen 19:24-25). God used an earthquake to open the tombs of resurrected saints (Mat 27:51-54), and three days later the angel of the Lord caused an earthquake when moving the stone from the mouth of Jesus’ tomb (Mat 28:2). What are the odds that tectonic plates would collide at just the right moment?

You may have heard of the Ring of Fire. Scientists say the area is prone to earthquakes and volcanic eruptions because it is where several tectonic plates meet. But if we look at the image below, we can see why God sends so many natural disasters to the region. You have catholics in South America, fags in San Francisco, commies in Russia and China, muslims in Indonesia and sheep shaggers in New Zealand.

The Bible tells us earthquakes will be more frequent in the Last Days (Mat 24:7; Mk 13:8; Lk 21:11), but plate tectonicists would have us believe the frequency of earthquakes is steady and may have decreased slightly. They are in denial. One day soon they will cry out for the mountains and rocks to fall on them (Rev 6:16).


Mountains

Amos 4:13 tells us God formed the mountains. But in a silly attempt to deny the Biblical Creation account, secular scientists would have us believe mountains are created when tectonic plates collide. This also allows them to deny evidence for Noah’s Flood. Marine fossils have been discovered on mountaintops around the world, but plate tectonicists claim the fossils got there because land that was once under the ocean has been pushed up by the buckling of plates. How convenient!But I have a question you can't answer. If earthquakes are caused by colliding plates and mountains are created by colliding plates, why aren't mountains created every time there's an earthquake?


The Immovable Earth

The Bible tells us the earth is immovable (Ps 104:5). Continents don’t just float around and crash into each other. God causes earthquakes and volcanic eruptions. He created the mountains. The theory of plate tectonics is a direct attack on the Bible. There can be no such thing as a theistic plate tectonicist.

Plate tectonics is only a theory, and like any theory, it can be easily disproved. The Arctic ice cap is constantly drifting on the ocean, much like the tectonic plates are supposedly drifting on molten rock. You cannot build on the Arctic ice cap; it’s too unstable. If you thrust a stake into the ice, it won’t be in the same place the next day. Yet if you build a house on a continental landmass, it doesn’t drift around and eventually collapse or disappear. If you drive a stake into the ground, you know it will be in the same place the next day. The average plate tectonicist lives as if his theory isn’t true. He is a hypocrite. It’s time to stop the foolish denial. If you come to Christ, you will never have to live in hypocrisy.

[Eddie James]

Re: Plate Tectonics – Another Scientific Theory DESTROYED!

Questionable Origins

Continental drift theory was invented in 1912 by Alfred Wegener. The theory was regarded with skepticism for decades, as Wegener wasn’t even a qualified geologist. It was eventually rejected, tossed onto the scrapheap of other failed scientific theories like alchemical transmutation, in the late 1950’s in favor of plate tectonics, which also teaches that the continents drift.


Pangaea

Plate tectonicists believe all the earth’s continents were once joined together in a supercontinent called Pangaea. Here’s their proof:

All the continents fit perfectly together… if you distort their shapes and leave gaps in between them and put Antarctica north of Australia and turn Australia upside down and put India next to Africa and join Alaska onto Russia and separate Eurasia and Africa. This is called confirmation bias, making the evidence fit the conclusion.

If all the continents were once joined together, we would expect to see the same animals on every continent. Instead, we find kangaroos only in Australia and tigers only in Asia. This is exactly what we would expect if God had created life uniquely for each continent (and restored each continent’s unique life again after the Flood). But if the continents were once joined, there would have been nothing to prevent each kind of animal from spreading all over the earth.

Given that the earth is flat, how did Antarctica manage to break up and encircle the earth?

Earthquakes and Volcanos

In an attempt to remove God from the equation, plate tectonicists attribute earthquakes and volcanos to natural phenomena and not to God, as the Bible teaches. God used a volcanic eruption to destroy Sodom and Gomorrah (Gen 19:24-25). God used an earthquake to open the tombs of resurrected saints (Mat 27:51-54), and three days later the angel of the Lord caused an earthquake when moving the stone from the mouth of Jesus’ tomb (Mat 28:2). What are the odds that tectonic plates would collide at just the right moment?

You may have heard of the Ring of Fire. Scientists say the area is prone to earthquakes and volcanic eruptions because it is where several tectonic plates meet. But if we look at the image below, we can see why God sends so many natural disasters to the region. You have catholics in South America, fags in San Francisco, commies in Russia and China, muslims in Indonesia and sheep shaggers in New Zealand.

The Bible tells us earthquakes will be more frequent in the Last Days (Mat 24:7; Mk 13:8; Lk 21:11), but plate tectonicists would have us believe the frequency of earthquakes is steady and may have decreased slightly. They are in denial. One day soon they will cry out for the mountains and rocks to fall on them (Rev 6:16).


Mountains

Amos 4:13 tells us God formed the mountains. But in a silly attempt to deny the Biblical Creation account, secular scientists would have us believe mountains are created when tectonic plates collide. This also allows them to deny evidence for Noah’s Flood. Marine fossils have been discovered on mountaintops around the world, but plate tectonicists claim the fossils got there because land that was once under the ocean has been pushed up by the buckling of plates. How convenient!But I have a question you can't answer. If earthquakes are caused by colliding plates and mountains are created by colliding plates, why aren't mountains created every time there's an earthquake?


The Immovable Earth

The Bible tells us the earth is immovable (Ps 104:5). Continents don’t just float around and crash into each other. God causes earthquakes and volcanic eruptions. He created the mountains. The theory of plate tectonics is a direct attack on the Bible. There can be no such thing as a theistic plate tectonicist.

Plate tectonics is only a theory, and like any theory, it can be easily disproved. The Arctic ice cap is constantly drifting on the ocean, much like the tectonic plates are supposedly drifting on molten rock. You cannot build on the Arctic ice cap; it’s too unstable. If you thrust a stake into the ice, it won’t be in the same place the next day. Yet if you build a house on a continental landmass, it doesn’t drift around and eventually collapse or disappear. If you drive a stake into the ground, you know it will be in the same place the next day. The average plate tectonicist lives as if his theory isn’t true. He is a hypocrite. It’s time to stop the foolish denial. If you come to Christ, you will never have to live in hypocrisy.

Hey
As a geologist this is the funniest bunch of nonsense I have ever read, it's literally that amazing.
Ok, let's answer some of the unbelievable claims. easy and fun.

The earth we live on is made of a solid iron core, kept solid due to the pressure imposed onto it, then a mantle, made from Molten rock called magma, and a cooling crust, which will eventually cool and solidify completely but as of yet continues to cool. The crust is extremely thin, if the earth was the size of an apple then the crust would be thinner than the apple skin, because of this it is susceptible to cracks, called faults, there are many around the globe, and where you find weaknesses you will find mountains, volcanoes and earthquakes.

We shall start with Pangea and the animals, firstly it's all true, we live in World today where just 1% of the animals that have lived on the planet are still around with us today. Some animal became extinct through natural occurrences and some have been attributed to human intervention, but the geographic distribution of animal consists with Pangea. There were bears in the UK and lions in Europe, there still are lions in Asia as well as africa and the same goes to elephants, it all fits perfectly.

Volcanoes: there are two types, shield volcanoes and stratovolcanoes, they differ in their eruption power. As specified above they will be found along fault lines.

Earthquakes happen when two plates interact in opposing forces, often the plate edges will continue to push or slide against each other without movement on the surface as friction prevents it, as the pressure builds and builds the plate boundary becomes more unstable, then when the pressure imposed exceeds the energy that the friction can take the two plates jolt, causing a wave of energy, that makes it's way to the surface and releases that energy in the form of earthquakes.
There is another type called post glacial refraction.

Mountains, happen when the two opposing plates hit head on forcing the plates upward, they don't happen overnight, it takes tens and hundreds of thousands of years of persistent opposing force to create ranges.

The ice caps, and there's two of them, one in Greenland and the other in Antarctica, don't float as they're on land, it's in the the title people "cap" der.

Ring of fire is a joke, Catholics in South America? Even by creation this makes no sense, South Americans weren't catholic until the the Spanish invasion, which happened a few hundred years ago not 6 thousand years ago. Communism didnt exist, and that part of Russia is Siberia which is extremely sparsely populated, "god" would have been far more successful putting the faults the other side of the country, unless he's an idiot if course.

And your confusing hypothesis with theory, gravity is only a theory, but it exists, a theory is when something has been proven using extensive evidence from science, maths, geology and other subjects, 90% of murderers have been convicted through theories, as an investigator or prosecution rarely sees the crime actually take place, but instead uses evidence to support his theory, it's called "beyond all reasonable doubt" good enough to convict murderers, not good enough for you? Hypothesis is when, evidence can be produced to support the hypothesis but the fundamentals can't I.e. it has been proved that amino acids (the building blocks of protein, which in turn is the building blocks of life) can be produced using inanimate gasses, proving the theory that life can come from non-life, what can't be proved is that those gasses were around when the first life forms started life on earth therefor it remains a hypothesis
Religion can't even claim to be a hypothesis, as something with no evidence at all is know as a MYTH or STORY.
Any questions please ask.
Edd

[Albert The Lunkhead (On Moderation)]

Re: Plate Tectonics – Another Scientific Theory DESTROYED!

Hey
As a geologist this is the funniest bunch of nonsense I have ever read, it's literally that amazing.
Ok, let's answer some of the unbelievable claims. easy and fun.

The earth we live on is made of a solid iron core, kept solid due to the pressure imposed onto it, then a mantle, made from Molten rock called magma, and a cooling crust, which will eventually cool and solidify completely but as of yet continues to cool. The crust is extremely thin, if the earth was the size of an apple then the crust would be thinner than the apple skin, because of this it is susceptible to cracks, called faults, there are many around the globe, and where you find weaknesses you will find mountains, volcanoes and earthquakes.

We shall start with Pangea and the animals, firstly it's all true, we live in World today where just 1% of the animals that have lived on the planet are still around with us today. Some animal became extinct through natural occurrences and some have been attributed to human intervention, but the geographic distribution of animal consists with Pangea. There were bears in the UK and lions in Europe, there still are lions in Asia as well as africa and the same goes to elephants, it all fits perfectly.

Volcanoes: there are two types, shield volcanoes and stratovolcanoes, they differ in their eruption power. As specified above they will be found along fault lines.

Earthquakes happen when two plates interact in opposing forces, often the plate edges will continue to push or slide against each other without movement on the surface as friction prevents it, as the pressure builds and builds the plate boundary becomes more unstable, then when the pressure imposed exceeds the energy that the friction can take the two plates jolt, causing a wave of energy, that makes it's way to the surface and releases that energy in the form of earthquakes.
There is another type called post glacial refraction.

Mountains, happen when the two opposing plates hit head on forcing the plates upward, they don't happen overnight, it takes tens and hundreds of thousands of years of persistent opposing force to create ranges.

The ice caps, and there's two of them, one in Greenland and the other in Antarctica, don't float as they're on land, it's in the the title people "cap" der.

Ring of fire is a joke, Catholics in South America? Even by creation this makes no sense, South Americans weren't catholic until the the Spanish invasion, which happened a few hundred years ago not 6 thousand years ago. Communism didnt exist, and that part of Russia is Siberia which is extremely sparsely populated, "god" would have been far more successful putting the faults the other side of the country, unless he's an idiot if course.

And your confusing hypothesis with theory, gravity is only a theory, but it exists, a theory is when something has been proven using extensive evidence from science, maths, geology and other subjects, 90% of murderers have been convicted through theories, as an investigator or prosecution rarely sees the crime actually take place, but instead uses evidence to support his theory, it's called "beyond all reasonable doubt" good enough to convict murderers, not good enough for you? Hypothesis is when, evidence can be produced to support the hypothesis but the fundamentals can't I.e. it has been proved that amino acids (the building blocks of protein, which in turn is the building blocks of life) can be produced using inanimate gasses, proving the theory that life can come from non-life, what can't be proved is that those gasses were around when the first life forms started life on earth therefor it remains a hypothesis
Religion can't even claim to be a hypothesis, as something with no evidence at all is know as a MYTH or STORY.
Any questions please ask.
Edd

At least we have another person who can speak some sense.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: Plate Tectonics – Another Scientific Theory DESTROYED!

Brother Pendergast, this is a most fascinating and helpful explanation. If a drawing can be considered "proof," then why not use a more interesting drawing of the continents?

[Zechariah Smyth]

Re: Plate Tectonics – Another Scientific Theory DESTROYED!

Geologists are such a bunch of perverts.



Did you know that "ring of fire" is queer slang for the post-coital pain that the "bottom" sodomite feels in their anus? Trust me, as an Ex-Gay I can assure you the description is unfortunately accurate.

It's repulsive inside jokes like this that ultimately undermine their whole agenda.

YiC,

Zech

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Plate Tectonics – Another Scientific Theory DESTROYED!

Hey
As a geologist this is the funniest bunch of nonsense I have ever read, it's literally that amazing.
Ok, let's answer some of the unbelievable claims. easy and fun.

Any questions please ask.
Edd

Odd so you think this forum is just about a few easy and cheep jokes do you?

[Eddie James]

Re: Plate Tectonics – Another Scientific Theory DESTROYED!

Odd so you think this forum is just about a few easy and cheep jokes do you?

Reading some of the bollocks on here I would say it's surely what it's based upon, you can't tell me you all actually believe this drivel????
Hahahahahahahahahahah

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Plate Tectonics – Another Scientific Theory DESTROYED!

Reading some of the bollocks on here I would say it's surely what it's based upon, you can't tell me you all actually believe this drivel????
Hahahahahahahahahahah

Perhaps you would like to pose that question to Mitt Romney, Mike Huckabee or any of the GOP hopeful for the US presidency last year if you think these beliefs are some kind of abortion?

[Billy Bob Jenkins]

Re: Plate Tectonics – Another Scientific Theory DESTROYED!

Plate tectonics is just a convenient excuse for idolatry and animal sacrifice (outmoded by Christ's temporary sacrifice). If scientists can convince the world of the historicity of Pangaea, what is to prevent everyone from having anal sex and perversions with animals?

Our friend the Gayologist will believe anything to justify sin.

[Eddie James]

Re: Plate Tectonics – Another Scientific Theory DESTROYED!

Plate tectonics is just a convenient excuse for idolatry and animal sacrifice (outmoded by Christ's temporary sacrifice). If scientists can convince the world of the historicity of Pangaea, what is to prevent everyone from having anal sex and perversions with animals?

Our friend the Gayologist will believe anything to justify sin.

Hey billy bob Jenkins
I have no idea that what you have stated here has anything to with anything, it's not that I believe everything I'm told, I've actively studied it for myself, I've spent the last 7 years in scientific research in my field of geology, I don't claim to know everything, but I consider my findings and teachings I have been taught to be irrefutably proven with empirical evidence. A notion obviously lost on some

[Billy Bob Jenkins]

Re: Plate Tectonics – Another Scientific Theory DESTROYED!

Hey billy bob Jenkins
I have no idea that what you have stated here has anything to with anything, it's not that I believe everything I'm told, I've actively studied it for myself, I've spent the last 7 years in scientific research in my field of geology, I don't claim to know everything, but I consider my findings and teachings I have been taught to be irrefutably proven with empirical evidence. A notion obviously lost on some

Name one person who believes in Pangaea for altruistic purposes.

End of argument.

[Eddie James]

Re: Plate Tectonics – Another Scientific Theory DESTROYED!

Name one person who believes in Pangaea for altruistic purposes.

End of argument.

Well seeing as scientist and myself as a geologist, conduct our research for the greater good of human understanding that could lead to further work in other fields to help the human race, I would say every geologist.
If you mean altruistic on a personal level, I couldn't answer, as I'd have to know the person to know if his agenda was altruistic or not

[A Follower]

Re: Plate Tectonics – Another Scientific Theory DESTROYED!

Hey
As a geologist this is the funniest bunch of nonsense I have ever read, it's literally that amazing.

Ah, an actual scientist come to spread lies and hatred, let's see what idiocy you come up with today.

Ok, let's answer some of the unbelievable claims. easy and fun.

The earth we live on is made of a solid iron core,

Nonsense. No one has ever been to the center of the earth to see this solid iron core. Not unsurprisingly, seeing earth is not a ball and does not have a core! Dimwit.

kept solid due to the pressure imposed onto it, then a mantle, made from Molten rock called magma,

That's interesting, somehow the planet decided that iron, and only iron should be purified and stored in the center, with all other matter excluded, and that for some reason iron should be solid and stone should melt, even though anyone who has ever seen iron being smelted from iron ore knows that iron melts at lower temperatures than rock. Actual proof that you're "theory" is a lie.

and a cooling crust, which will eventually cool and solidify completely but as of yet continues to cool. The crust is extremely thin, if the earth was the size of an apple then the crust would be thinner than the apple skin, because of this it is susceptible to cracks, called faults, there are many around the globe, and where you find weaknesses you will find mountains, volcanoes and earthquakes.

Except of course that an apple does not have a liquid center. And if there really was so much pressure than a hole punctured in the crust would cause all the magma to flow out until the pressure had dissipated, reality shows that this does not happen, according to people like you there still is pressure at the center of the earth, which could not exist if your crust theory was true. And have you ever sat on a waterbed? The slightest weight causes the entire bed to ripple, so if earth had a tiny crust floating on liquid every step you take would be like walking on a waterbed. To me walking on the ground feels pretty solid... (hint: your theory is broken when reality does not match what your theory predicts)

We shall start with Pangea and the animals, firstly it's all true, we live in World today where just 1% of the animals that have lived on the planet are still around with us today. Some animal became extinct through natural occurrences and some have been attributed to human intervention, but the geographic distribution of animal consists with Pangea. There were bears in the UK and lions in Europe, there still are lions in Asia as well as africa and the same goes to elephants, it all fits perfectly.

Lies and more lies. Just as we have come to expect from scientists.

You are now claiming that India and Africa split up in the past 100000 years, after which India slammed into Asia, because that's when biologists say lions lived in Asia. Your colleagues in the geology fraud claim that India slammed into Asia 55 million years. So which theory is true?

(Neither, the world is just six thousand years old, and that's the time when God put lions where He wanted them)

Volcanoes: there are two types, shield volcanoes and stratovolcanoes, they differ in their eruption power. As specified above they will be found along fault lines.

And tell me, did the fault lines at Sodom and Gomorrah appear before or after God decided that those cities needed to be volcanoed to death?

And what about Hawaii? Or the Yellowstone Caldera? Where are their faultlines?

Oh my, I'm sorry, I must have just caught you at another lie.

Earthquakes happen when two plates interact in opposing forces, often the plate edges will continue to push or slide against each other without movement on the surface as friction prevents it, as the pressure builds and builds the plate boundary becomes more unstable, then when the pressure imposed exceeds the energy that the friction can take the two plates jolt, causing a wave of energy, that makes it's way to the surface and releases that energy in the form of earthquakes.
There is another type called post glacial refraction.

It is good to know that all the people complaining about earthquakes from gas and oil delving are liars. Just like those 250,000 people who died from the Haiti earthquake, that "earthquake" also appeared nowhere near an existing fault line, clear evidence that they are all scammers. Thank you for providing us with the proof of that.

Mountains, happen when the two opposing plates hit head on forcing the plates upward, they don't happen overnight, it takes tens and hundreds of thousands of years of persistent opposing force to create ranges.

That's strange, the Bible tells us we can move mountains just with our faith, it does not mention anything related to moving around plates. Once again we're proven to be right and you're proven to be wrong.

The ice caps, and there's two of them, one in Greenland and the other in Antarctica, don't float as they're on land, it's in the the title people "cap" der.

Err, ice floats, it doesn't matter if it's ice from greenland or from the fridge... Once again science is proven to make idiotic statements.

Ring of fire is a joke, Catholics in South America? Even by creation this makes no sense, South Americans weren't catholic until the the Spanish invasion, which happened a few hundred years ago not 6 thousand years ago. Communism didnt exist, and that part of Russia is Siberia which is extremely sparsely populated, "god" would have been far more successful putting the faults the other side of the country, unless he's an idiot if course.

Of course the ring of fire is a joke. It was made up by your kind: geologists.

So what if the South Americans weren't cathlic before the Spanish visited? They sure as hell weren't Christian. They sacrificed people on altars, worshipped tree gods, etc. I can clearly understand why God would want to punish people like that with volcanoes in the middle of their cities.

And seriously? Calling God an idiot because He chooses not to mass-murder people? What the piffle is wrong with you? Are you some sort of nazi-communist hellbent on killing people, like Hitler or Stalin?

And your confusing hypothesis with theory, gravity is only a theory, but it exists, a theory is when something has been proven using extensive evidence from science, maths, geology and other subjects,

Gravity is a proven false theory, a lie. First Newton invented gravity, and people quickly figured out that nonsense simply cannot be true. And lo and behold: the trajectory of the planets across the sky does not make sense at all, at least one of the smaller planets moves slightly slower than predicted by Newton. Not surprisingly, you can't fit a heliocentric model in an geocentric reality, so Einstein told the world that Newton was a retard, and came up with his own gravity. All over the world people regard Einstein as some smart person, but since Einstein disproved Newton not a single high school student has learned the formula for Einstein's gravity, they are still only taught Newton's. Obviously when students are taught proven lies, anything they build on that foundation is not going be of any worth. Of course Einstein's gravity replacement is wrong, it doesn't account for birds or airplanes, and even the stars don't fit in the model, the scientists have to pretend that 90% of the universe is made of dark matter that is somehow all around us but just by coincidence nowhere on earth. When you have to start making things up to make the universe fit your scientific theories, you might want to consider that your theory is wrong, that science is fundamentally broken and that the only true way to knowledge is through God.

90% of murderers have been convicted through theories, as an investigator or prosecution rarely sees the crime actually take place, but instead uses evidence to support his theory, it's called "beyond all reasonable doubt" good enough to convict murderers, not good enough for you?

It is good enough for me. I have proven beyond any reasonable doubt that you are a liar, as are all your fellow scientists. So I expect you to renounce them and accept Jesus as your Lord and Savior.

Hypothesis is when, evidence can be produced to support the hypothesis but the fundamentals can't

No, a hypothesis is when you have an idea about how something works, but have no idea whether that might be true or not. What you're talking about is called conjecture. If the world was ball-shaped and if the sun was a ball of fire a million miles away and if gravity exists and if iron melts at a higher temperature than rocks and if a lot more things then your theory of plate tectonics could work. But seeing the fundamentals aren't there and can't even be proven, there is no reason to attach any worth to your conjecture.

I.e. it has been proved that amino acids (the building blocks of protein, which in turn is the building blocks of life) can be produced using inanimate gasses, proving the theory that life can come from non-life, what can't be proved is that those gasses were around when the first life forms started life on earth therefor it remains a hypothesis

Interesting, so you still believe in the spontaneous generation of life, I thought you scientists stopped believing that once you found out about reproduction. Mice and bacteria don't just appear in a flash from some inanimate gas, they reproduce and spread and invade your grain stores. It's cute how naive you are in this (sexual reproduction), but it really doesn't help the discussion when you are this ignorant.

As far as your suggestion that life coming from non-life has been proven because some chemicals react is ludicrous. In the past 60 years since that amino acid experiment it has been proven beyond any doubt that it is impossible to create protein from amino acids in water, not once has any scientist been able to replicate the step from amino acid to life, so once again science proves you wrong.

Religion can't even claim to be a hypothesis, as something with no evidence at all is know as a MYTH or STORY.
Any questions please ask.
Edd

While not all religion has evidence, Christianity certainly has. Not just the Bible, but contemporary sources speak of Jesus and the miracles He performed.

Another piece of evidence is the 1611 KJV Bible. This is undeniably the Word of God, it says so itself. Because the Bible is so morally correct, completely internally consistent and because not one claim of the Bible has ever been found to be wrong, and that it contains information from before there was life it can only have been written by God.

Your theory/hunch/hypothesis/conjecture of plate tectonics and creation of life have no evidence for them as you admit yourself. There is no fundamental proof of the ideas that underpin your theories, so by your own words you are not allowed to call them theories.

And a word on the word games, just because you scientists took the word theory and tried to change its meaning doesn't mean that somehow all the ideas you call theories suddenly have more (or any) worth.


Child, it is time you submit to God and leave this nonsense you call geology behind. Never has a geologist made the world a better place, while Christians do nothing else.

[Eddie James]

Re: Plate Tectonics – Another Scientific Theory DESTROYED!

Ah, an actual scientist come to spread lies and hatred, let's see what idiocy you come up with today.

Nonsense. No one has ever been to the center of the earth to see this solid iron core. Not unsurprisingly, seeing earth is not a ball and does not have a core! Dimwit.

Refuse to dignify with answer, too ridiculous

That's interesting, somehow the planet decided that iron, and only iron should be purified and stored in the center, with all other matter excluded, and that for some reason iron should be solid and stone should melt, even though anyone who has ever seen iron being smelted from iron ore knows that iron melts at lower temperatures than rock. Actual proof that you're "theory" is a lie.

Kept solid due to pressure imposed on, iron, nick gold and other elements and minerals are also found within the magma

Except of course that an apple does not have a liquid center. And if there really was so much pressure than a hole punctured in the crust would cause all the magma to flow out until the pressure had dissipated, reality shows that this does not happen, according to people like you there still is pressure at the center of the earth, which could not exist if your crust theory was true. And have you ever sat on a waterbed? The slightest weight causes the entire bed to ripple, so if earth had a tiny crust floating on liquid every step you take would be like walking on a waterbed. To me walking on the ground feels pretty solid... (hint: your theory is broken when reality does not match what your theory predicts)

Your massively underestimating the size of earth and the crust, the "apple crust" example is used in relative terms, the earth crust is on average around 70-100miles thick

Lies and more lies. Just as we have come to expect from scientists.

You are now claiming that India and Africa split up in the past 100000 years, after which India slammed into Asia, because that's when biologists say lions lived in Asia. Your colleagues in the geology fraud claim that India slammed into Asia 55 million years. So which theory is true?

To basic to waste time answering

(Neither, the world is just six thousand years old, and that's the time when God put lions where He wanted them)

No he didn't, lions are felids and are ancestors of previous felids

And tell me, did the fault lines at Sodom and Gomorrah appear before or after God decided that those cities needed to be volcanoed to death?

Well, common sense dictates that that volcanic eruption happen along faults, except in the exceptionaly few hotspot areas, cities on faults will run the risk of encountering natural disaster

And what about Hawaii? Or the Yellowstone Caldera? Where are their faultlines?

Oh my, I'm sorry, I must have just caught you at another lie.

Yellowstone is a hotspot where mantle rises to the crust. The caldera itself is stationary and the North American plate moves southwesterly over it

Hawaii has 2 of the biggest shield volcanos in the world, Mauna Kea and Mouna Loa, at around 10000 metres from top to bottom, Mauna Kea is the tallest mountain on earth, it too lies on a hot spot, we know hotspots don't move with the tectonic plate therefor they can be found anywhere within the world. There are two hypothesis for this, but they are lengthy.

It is good to know that all the people complaining about earthquakes from gas and oil delving are liars. Just like those 250,000 people who died from the Haiti earthquake, that "earthquake" also appeared nowhere near an existing fault line, clear evidence that they are all scammers. Thank you for providing us with the proof of that.

Ignorance is not a virtue. I assume you mean fracking?
Haiti lies on the northern edge of the carribean plate, it's what's know as a blind thrust fault, it forms where the fault line itself doesn't make it to the surface and are therefore remains visually hidden until they rupture at the surface
The 1994 California earthquake I believe was attributed to a blind thrust fault. All proven with evidence

That's strange, the Bible tells us we can move mountains just with our faith, it does not mention anything related to moving around plates. Once again we're proven to be right and you're proven to be wrong.

Gods word holds no truth. Please send me a video of you moving a mountain with faith????

Err, ice floats, it doesn't matter if it's ice from greenland or from the fridge... Once again science is proven to make idiotic statements.

Ice FROM Greenland??? The ice cap is ON Greenland and Antarctica, Ice caps DON'T float, they are situated ON LAND.

Of course the ring of fire is a joke. It was made up by your kind: geologists.

So what if the South Americans weren't cathlic before the Spanish visited? They sure as hell weren't Christian. They sacrificed people on altars, worshipped tree gods, etc. I can clearly understand why God would want to punish people like that with volcanoes in the middle of their cities.

But what did the taiga Ever do????? Idiocy

And seriously? Calling God an idiot because He chooses not to mass-murder people? What the piffle is wrong with you? Are you some sort of nazi-communist hellbent on killing people, like Hitler or Stalin?

Nicely spun round, the assertion was made he put the fault was put there to kill Russian communists, which would be idiotic if that was the plan, wouldn't it????????

Gravity is a proven false theory, a lie. First Newton invented gravity, and people quickly figured out that nonsense simply cannot be true. And lo and behold: the trajectory of the planets across the sky does not make sense at all, at least one of the smaller planets moves slightly slower than predicted by Newton. Not surprisingly, you can't fit a heliocentric model in an geocentric reality, so Einstein told the world that Newton was a retard, and came up with his own gravity. All over the world people regard Einstein as some smart person, but since Einstein disproved Newton not a single high school student has learned the formula for Einstein's gravity, they are still only taught Newton's. Obviously when students are taught proven lies, anything they build on that foundation is not going be of any worth. Of course Einstein's gravity replacement is wrong, it doesn't account for birds or airplanes, and even the stars don't fit in the model, the scientists have to pretend that 90% of the universe is made of dark matter that is somehow all around us but just by coincidence nowhere on earth. When you have to start making things up to make the universe fit your scientific theories, you might want to consider that your theory is wrong, that science is fundamentally broken and that the only true way to knowledge is through God.

Not even going to go there, your argument is so ridiculous words can't describe

It is good enough for me. I have proven beyond any reasonable doubt that you are a liar, as are all your fellow scientists. So I expect you to renounce them and accept Jesus as your Lord and Savior.

Out of the question


No, a hypothesis is when you have an idea about how something works, but have no idea whether that might be true or not. What you're talking about is called conjecture. If the world was ball-shaped and if the sun was a ball of fire a million miles away and if gravity exists and if iron melts at a higher temperature than rocks and if a lot more things then your theory of plate tectonics could work. But seeing the fundamentals aren't there and can't even be proven, there is no reason to attach any worth to your conjecture.

Wrong!!

Interesting, so you still believe in the spontaneous generation of life, I thought you scientists stopped believing that once you found out about reproduction. Mice and bacteria don't just appear in a flash from some inanimate gas, they reproduce and spread and invade your grain stores. It's cute how naive you are in this (sexual reproduction), but it really doesn't help the discussion when you are this ignorant.

Life came from none life, call it what you want, it wasn't a deity

As far as your suggestion that life coming from non-life has been proven because some chemicals react is ludicrous. In the past 60 years since that amino acid experiment it has been proven beyond any doubt that it is impossible to create protein from amino acids in water, not once has any scientist been able to replicate the step from amino acid to life, so once again science proves you wrong.

It a fact, it's on YouTube watch for yourself

While not all religion has evidence, Christianity certainly has. Not just the Bible, but contemporary sources speak of Jesus and the miracles He performed.n

Waste of time, no religion has a scrap of evidence, or surely the world population would surely be repenting as we speak????

Another piece of evidence is the 1611 KJV Bible. This is undeniably the Word of God, it says so itself. Because the Bible is so morally correct, completely internally consistent and because not one claim of the Bible has ever been found to be wrong, and that it contains information from before there was life it can only have been written by God.

Bible = fiction = Harry potter. Same logic you guys use, but not evidence


Your theory/hunch/hypothesis/conjecture of plate tectonics and creation of life have no evidence for them as you admit yourself. There is no fundamental proof of the ideas that underpin your theories, so by your own words you are not allowed to call them theories.

Is fact

And a word on the word games, just because you scientists took the word theory and tried to change its meaning doesn't mean that somehow all the ideas you call theories suddenly have more (or any) worth.

Scientific philosophy of some sort predates monotheistic religion


Child, it is time you submit to God and leave this nonsense you call geology behind. Never has a geologist made the world a better place, while Christians do nothing else.

Thanks, about as enlightening as a stab in the dark, which incessantly is what you tried here .............and failed

[Albert The Lunkhead (On Moderation)]

Re: Plate Tectonics – Another Scientific Theory DESTROYED!

Ah, an actual scientist come to spread lies and hatred, let's see what idiocy you come up with today.

This is similar to you Christians.

Nonsense. No one has ever been to the center of the earth to see this solid iron core. Not unsurprisingly, seeing earth is not a ball and does not have a core! Dimwit.

It does have a core. We have a big ole magnetic field from the spinning molten core. This is proof for the actual truth. Magnetic fields in nature are generated by electric currents in plasma or by iron, and the earth is too dense for plasma. We also have evidence for this iron core by the earth;s mass, as we can directly calculate from its diameter and the fore of gravity, and thus its density is known.

That's interesting, somehow the planet decided that iron, and only iron should be purified and stored in the center, with all other matter excluded, and that for some reason iron should be solid and stone should melt, even though anyone who has ever seen iron being smelted from iron ore knows that iron melts at lower temperatures than rock. Actual proof that you're "theory" is a lie.

How can a planet "decide" anything? Planets have no brains, they are not alive. So what if iron melts at lower temperature? It's still heavier than rock. Heavy things sink, if you understand science.

May I just add that the core isn't pure iron, anyway. It has a lot of nickel also, and some traces of gold, platinum, cobalt and other elements. Also enough uranium and radium to keep the core hot.

Lies and more lies. Just as we have come to expect from scientists.

Let me correct you there. Just as we have come to expect from Christians.

(Neither, the world is just six thousand years old, and that's the time when God put lions where He wanted them)

The world is not six thousand years old your idiot. The evidence is all around you for it being billions of years.

And tell me, did the fault lines at Sodom and Gomorrah appear before or after God decided that those cities needed to be volcanoed to death?

God didn't decide that. It was nature.

And what about Hawaii? Or the Yellowstone Caldera? Where are their faultlines?

New faults are being discovered all the time.

Oh my, I'm sorry, I must have just caught you at another lie.

No you haven't. I'll just read the Bible, and i'll get back to you at how many lies i find.

It is good to know that all the people complaining about earthquakes from gas and oil delving are liars. Just like those 250,000 people who died from the Haiti earthquake, that "earthquake" also appeared nowhere near an existing fault line, clear evidence that they are all scammers. Thank you for providing us with the proof of that.

There are Faults near Haiti. Blind thrust faults was associated with the Enriquillo-Plantain Garden fault zone system that caused an earthquake approximately 25km.

That's strange, the Bible tells us we can move mountains just with our faith, it does not mention anything related to moving around plates. Once again we're proven to be right and you're proven to be wrong.

No. You've just proved the Bible being wrong.

Once again science is proven to make idiotic statements.

No. Again, you've just shown how stupid you are with a uneducated understanding of how science works.

Of course the ring of fire is a joke. It was made up by your kind: geologists.

I can say the same to you. Of course Christianity is a joke. It was made up by your kind: Idiots.

And seriously? Calling God an idiot because He chooses not to mass-murder people? What the piffle is wrong with you? Are you some sort of nazi-communist hellbent on killing people, like Hitler or Stalin?

Well, Hitler wasn't an Atheist, anyway - shows how damaging religion is. Nevertheless, you have no evidence saying God chooses these things. It's the nature of science. Deal with the truth.

Gravity is a proven false theory, a lie.

No, it's not. It's you idiotic brain that can't accept the truth.

First Newton invented gravity, and people quickly figured out that nonsense simply cannot be true. And lo and behold: the trajectory of the planets across the sky does not make sense at all, at least one of the smaller planets moves slightly slower than predicted by Newton. Not surprisingly, you can't fit a heliocentric model in an geocentric reality, so Einstein told the world that Newton was a retard, and came up with his own gravity. All over the world people regard Einstein as some smart person, but since Einstein disproved Newton not a single high school student has learned the formula for Einstein's gravity, they are still only taught Newton's. Obviously when students are taught proven lies, anything they build on that foundation is not going be of any worth. Of course Einstein's gravity replacement is wrong, it doesn't account for birds or airplanes, and even the stars don't fit in the model, the scientists have to pretend that 90% of the universe is made of dark matter that is somehow all around us but just by coincidence nowhere on earth. When you have to start making things up to make the universe fit your scientific theories, you might want to consider that your theory is wrong, that science is fundamentally broken and that the only true way to knowledge is through God.

I don't know what you have been smoking, but can I have some? Why are you embarrassing your family, wife and children in this way? Now, you have found out that gravity is fake, you now need to hold on tight because you might float out of the planet.

It is good enough for me. I have proven beyond any reasonable doubt that you are a liar, as are all your fellow scientists.

And I've debunked all these lies. LOL

So I expect you to renounce them and accept Jesus as your Lord and Savior.

Wait, so is Jesus our Lord or God??? You Christians are always making false information up.

[QUOTE=A Follower;994688]
No, a hypothesis is when you have an idea about how something works, but have no idea whether that might be true or not. What you're talking about is called conjecture.

If the world was ball-shaped

Spherical shape.

if the sun was a ball of fire a million miles away

It is.

and if gravity exists

It does.

and if iron melts at a higher temperature than rocks

Yup.

if a lot more things then your theory of plate tectonics could work.

I think science has just proved it right.

But seeing the fundamentals aren't there and can't even be proven...

They are there , and they can be proven.

...so once again science proves you wrong.

How does that prove science wrong? Because we can't do it yet, doesn't mean we can't do it in the future. That would be logic if you had a brain.

Christianity certainly has. Not just the Bible, but contemporary sources speak of Jesus and the miracles He performed.

You have no evidence is was Jesus.

Your theory/hunch/hypothesis/conjecture of plate tectonics and creation of life have no evidence for them as you admit yourself. There is no fundamental proof of the ideas that underpin your theories, so by your own words you are not allowed to call them theories.

There is fundamental proof. You just need to understand science to know them.

Child, it is time you submit to God and leave this nonsense you call geology behind. Never has a geologist made the world a better place, while Christians do nothing else.

Child, it is time you submit to science and leave this nonsense you call God behind. Never have religion made the world a better place, while science has made us look at the truth.