[Remy Lebeau]

Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

blah blah blah baseless theories that I'll pretend are fact because some guy who deemed himself an "expert" said so and put it in a book blah blah blah

We will not tolerate racism here. Do not try to pull one over on us. If we are to believe that humans evolved from some common ancestor then logic dictates that said intermediary species should still exist. If a chimp was good enough to survive and humans were good enough to not only survive, but dominate the earth, it stands to reason that all the creatures from this supposed common ancestor to modern day man should have been able to survive. Logically, seeing as white caucasoids are at the top of the piramid, all the other dairtier races must be those intermediate species that evolved into us.



From left to right we have a hairy a-rab, a white man, a little old nigress, a chinkoid, a hairy asiatic-persian kung fu master, a big nigra buck and finally a jew. It's as plain as day that you secular scientist are calling the cursed people sub human animals. Your bigotry repulses me. It infuriates me.



Your darwinista bigotry will not be tolerated!!! REPENT!!!

[F. Nietzsche]

Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

We will not tolerate racism here. Do not try to pull one over on us. If we are to believe that humans evolved from some common ancestor then logic dictates that said intermediary species should still exist. If a chimp was good enough to survive and humans were good enough to not only survive, but dominate the earth, it stands to reason that all the creatures from this supposed common ancestor to modern day man should have been able to survive. Logically, seeing as white caucasoids are at the top of the piramid, all the other dairtier races must be those intermediate species that evolved into us.

Not necessarily true. If the timescale is adjusted from Young Earth to scientific terms, and climatic or geologic factors are weighted accordingly, such a common ancestor could in fact have gone extinct due to changes in climate and other species being more successful at filling the ecological niche they occupied. Population drift between the Equatorial African rainforest and the Great Rift valley caused the latter to develop bipedalism, and eventually create hominids proper, since there were different evolutionary and ecological pressures than was otherwise present. The population remaining in the tropics, however, faced a different set of pressures. Since the species as it originally stood was not as effective at filling ecological niches as their genetic descendents, they would have been driven into extinction.

From left to right we have a hairy a-rab, a white man, a little old nigress, a chinkoid, a hairy asiatic-persian kung fu master, a big nigra buck and finally a jew. It's as plain as day that you secular scientist are calling the cursed people sub human animals. Your bigotry repulses me. It infuriates me.



Your darwinista bigotry will not be tolerated!!! REPENT!!!

Actually, those are just renditions of hominids based off fossils. I'm not calling you or anyone else subhuman, since that would imply you aren't human, which is patently false.

[Professor Bessemer]

Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

My goodness! This thread has certainly attracted quite an interesting bunch of posters! Fisherman Jake seems to be on the right track, but there also seem to be quite a few genuine Darwinist atheists posting their heresy here as well.

Those supposed scientists think all they need to do to impress people with their supposed knowledge is to metaphorically back up a dump truck full of big words and just spill them into our Godly forum.

Well friends, we all know that it takes more than "logic" and "facts" to convince a True Christian™ that he is wrong. Unless you evolutionists can provide some evidence from the KJV 1611 Bible about your "theory", I am afraid you will not find any buyers for what you are selling here on our holy board.

[Mordecai]

Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

Well friends, we all know that it takes more than "logic" and "facts" to convince a True Christian™ that he is wrong. Unless you evolutionists can provide some evidence from the KJV 1611 Bible about your "theory", I am afraid you will not find any buyers for what you are selling here on our holy board.

That's like trying to get someone to prove Hobbits don't exist by only using the book the Hobbit.

"Logic" and "facts' got man to the moon, created the atom bomb, any technological advancement mankind has made has been through "logic" and "facts".

[F. Nietzsche]

Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

My goodness! This thread has certainly attracted quite an interesting bunch of posters! Fisherman Jake seems to be on the right track, but there also seem to be quite a few genuine Darwinist atheists posting their heresy here as well.

Those supposed scientists think all they need to do to impress people with their supposed knowledge is to metaphorically back up a dump truck full of big words and just spill them into our Godly forum.

Well friends, we all know that it takes more than "logic" and "facts" to convince a True Christian™ that he is wrong. Unless you evolutionists can provide some evidence from the KJV 1611 Bible about your "theory", I am afraid you will not find any buyers for what you are selling here on our holy board.

I actually cannot find suitable Biblical sources for what I'm suggesting. Though, it must be pointed out that Biblical narrative is incompatible with most branches of mainstream science when taken literally. Though, it must be realized, the word million didn't enter the English language until the 13th century, and people had few abilities to conceive of amounts of that magnitude or greater at the time Biblical narrative was written.

Take the notion of the age of the Earth and Universe. Despite the suggestion that the Bible makes of the age being less than 10,000 years, a number of different sources would suggest that its actually much older.

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

Look Nietzsche, what's the point of the Earth being older than 6,000 years? Does it really matter to you? God says it is and that is sufficient.

If you keep babbling on with your vague passive aggressive doubts, you, and anyone who listens to you, will end up burning in Hell.

Now, I'm as compassionate as the next True Christian(tm) and I've no great desire to look down from Heaven and see your skin being peeled in a vat of Brimstone, so, wouldn't it be easier just to accept 6000 years?

[John Scopes]

Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

I actually cannot find suitable Biblical sources for what I'm suggesting. Though, it must be pointed out that Biblical narrative is incompatible with most branches of mainstream science when taken literally. Though, it must be realized, the word million didn't enter the English language until the 13th century, and people had few abilities to conceive of amounts of that magnitude or greater at the time Biblical narrative was written.

Take the notion of the age of the Earth and Universe. Despite the suggestion that the Bible makes of the age being less than 10,000 years, a number of different sources would suggest that its actually much older.

It is inspiring to see you sir. My research here primarily centers around an alleged lack of genetic diversity among evangelical Christians, and the subsequent expression of deleterious recessive genes that results from that.

I am specifically looking at genetic transmission to offspring passed from father to daughter after her birth, and from brother to sister.

I do not factor in the more common first cousin relationships that occur within this particular branch of Christianity. I am of course not here to condemn, merely to further knowledge within evolutionary biology.

[Remy Lebeau]

Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

Not necessarily true. If the timescale is adjusted from Young Earth to scientific terms, and climatic or geologic factors are weighted accordingly, such a common ancestor could in fact have gone extinct due to changes in climate and other species being more successful at filling the ecological niche they occupied. Population drift between the Equatorial African rainforest and the Great Rift valley caused the latter to develop bipedalism, and eventually create hominids proper, since there were different evolutionary and ecological pressures than was otherwise present. The population remaining in the tropics, however, faced a different set of pressures. Since the species as it originally stood was not as effective at filling ecological niches as their genetic descendents, they would have been driven into extinction.

Not necessarily true!?!?!?! The "evidence" is right in front of us. You're going to tell me that a chimp could make it, but a bipedal humanoid that is somewhere between a chimp and a man can't???? WHAT!!!

Negroidials are clearly apish looking. Do not insult my intelligence by stating that people could have evolved without negroidials being some kind of intermediary species!!! Either God cursed them or they are ape men. That's it. No other options whatsoever. They are ugly, they can't run any form of governent, they can't invent(they aren't even in the bronze age), they are cruel, violent and have a lesser intelligence than whites... come on, left to their own devices, without the inventions that whites provided them, they still live in mud huts, take showers under pissing cows and use dung as bug repellant. These people die from tooth aches for Christ's sake. I could go on and on about just how hopelessly inferior they are compared to normal people. And you expect me to believe that anyone with any objective mind, not clouded by liberal secular political correctness, who isn't worried about stepping on anybody's feeling, is going to honest claim that we are on the same evolutionary level, if evilution was true??? You don't fool me you racist atheist. This whole evolution thing is meant to show that negroidials are sub human animals, nothing more than evolutionary precursors who would have gone extinct 10 times over if not for the intervention of real humans.

You sicken me. Your hatred and prejudice pain me to my very core. Our creation science department knows that those negroidials are humans cursed by God and converted so that they would be more suited to manual labour as servants of the descendants of Shem and Japheth. But you.. YOU would call them ape men. Dispictable!!

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

Amen brother Remy! It is a well-established fact that Darwinism is the most racist cult on earth. Darwin's writings reek with all kinds of contempt for "primitive" people.

[Professor Bessemer]

Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

That's like trying to get someone to prove Hobbits don't exist by only using the book the Hobbit.

"Logic" and "facts' got man to the moon, created the atom bomb, any technological advancement mankind has made has been through "logic" and "facts".

So you would rather believe the universe is a vast emptiness peopled only by soulless bags of flesh? I would weep for you if I did not have the Lord to uplift my spirit with His love.

Turn to Him, for He can save you!

I actually cannot find suitable Biblical sources for what I'm suggesting. Though, it must be pointed out that Biblical narrative is incompatible with most branches of mainstream science when taken literally. Though, it must be realized, the word million didn't enter the English language until the 13th century, and people had few abilities to conceive of amounts of that magnitude or greater at the time Biblical narrative was written.

Take the notion of the age of the Earth and Universe. Despite the suggestion that the Bible makes of the age being less than 10,000 years, a number of different sources would suggest that its actually much older.

You are very polite for a hellbound atheist. Your grammar is impeccable and your arguments are well written. Kudos to you sir! That unfortunately does not alter the fact that you are utterly and completely wrong.

God created the earth for us True Christians™ to eventually inhabit. Scientheists like myself have come to the conclusion that the rest of His vast cosmos is simply to delight us on dark nights when we have become too weary to read His words in the KJV 1611.

Is God not amazing? He could have simply put our Earth in a giant cosmic bell jar, but he did not. He went the extra mile and created an unending universe, just so we would have something to look at, once He inspired us to create telescopes!

Our God is an awesome God!

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

You're female, it would be most surprising if you understood anything at all. Just follow what your father says and that will be enough.

Mackenzie Phillips followed what her father said . . .

[Remy Lebeau]

Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

Looks like our resident secular egghead F. Nietzsche wannabe is lost for words. I wouldn't show my face on this thread either if I was shown to be a bigoted racist.

[SecretFalcon]

Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

Wow, I'm going to have a little fun with this... My science teacher is an atheist that not only supports it in the class, but singles out the Christians too. She thinks she's better than everyone else...

[A Follower]

Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

Don't forget to ask why you should believe what the textbooks say.

Textbooks:
- Authors are not all-knowing
- Each year new editions are printed with some errors corrected, others introduced
- Authors have never performed miracles
- Authors are likely to have lied at some times in their lives, what proof is there that they did not lie in their books?
- Authors are not infallible

Compare that to the KJV 1611 Bible:
- God is all-knowing
- Never changes, always remains true
- God performs miracles whenever he wants to, with documentary evidence to prove it
- God always speaks Truth
- God is infallible

Remember, public schools force all kinds of crap into impressionable young children's heads. Schools tell about santa claus, tooth fairies, easter bunnies, socialism and science. There is evidence all the former are lies, why should anything else teachers say be listened to?

[SecretFalcon]

Re: Top Ten Questions to Ask Your Atheist Science Teacher!

Don't forget to ask why you should believe what the textbooks say.

Textbooks:
- Authors are not all-knowing
- Each year new editions are printed with some errors corrected, others introduced
- Authors have never performed miracles
- Authors are likely to have lied at some times in their lives, what proof is there that they did not lie in their books?
- Authors are not infallible

Compare that to the KJV 1611 Bible:
- God is all-knowing
- Never changes, always remains true
- God performs miracles whenever he wants to, with documentary evidence to prove it
- God always speaks Truth
- God is infallible

Remember, public schools force all kinds of crap into impressionable young children's heads. Schools tell about santa claus, tooth fairies, easter bunnies, socialism and science. There is evidence all the former are lies, why should anything else teachers say be listened to?

Perfect! Thanks a lot! My first semester at the start of school is spare- than biology, so I'll have some time to recap.