[Dr. Anthony J. Toole]

Re: Open Letter to Catholics: Why Not Jesus?

I get my information from business leaders such as Mike the Pillow guy and of course David Bateman, co-founder and chairman of property management software provider Entrata. If you follow his emails you would already be aware of his considered position on the Pope.

“For 300 years the Jews have been trying to infiltrate the Catholic Church and place a Jew covertly at the top. It happened in 2013 with Pope Francis.”

We know from history they will use minorities, feminists and the gays to further their agenda of systematically exterminating billions of people and consolidating all the countries in the world under a single flag with totalitarian rule. Bateman confirmed to Fox 13 TV that he is the author of the email.

“Yes. I sent it,” he told the news station. “I have nothing but love for the Jewish people. Some of my closest friends are Jews.”

What a great guy! Even tho the joos are exterminating billions of Christians and establishing a totalitarian world government, he is friends with some of them.

[Basilissa]

Re: Open Letter to Catholics: Why Not Jesus?

This is the official publication of the official church: https://www.osservatoreromano.va/it/...0/sorelle.html

Can you remind me, when did L'Osservatore Romano replace Acta Apostolicae Sedis as the official publication of the Vatican? I believe the encyclical letters and other official business is still published in the latter, and private opinions of private citizens (like Miss Giorgia Salatiello, who seems to possess a degree in philosophy but is not part of the church hierarchy) in the former...?

However, since you seem to be well versed in the horrible dialect of Latin spoken in Italy today, can you shed some light on Papa Francesco's love for Pachamama, the pagan goddess of the Andes? Because that can be the feminist connection you're looking for.

[ERvengeanceDDR5]

Re: Open Letter to Catholics: Why Not Jesus?

since you seem to be well versed in the horrible dialect of Latin.

No I cannot understand latin. I did classical studies, 5 years of latin in highscool but I forgot even the grammar basic rules. Maybe with some months of training I could refresh the info, maybe not, but right now I cannot understand the latin language. I mean I understand the vague meaning of the context and almost nothing more.



Basically Papa Cuckesco is promoting feminism since the day he was elected Pope. It's not a novelty, he promotes female studies all day long. Of course the "official" christians promote him, they are all happy because of the feminism he is promoting. There are alot of women that want to emerge in the hierarchies of the church that potentially gives even more money than the gender studies courses. The moneyflow of the church is very very big, of course many women want to be funded to keep doing their so called "bible studies" where the only thing they do is to show proof that the Bible is "misogynistic" with a shitload of quotations. That's all they do, they just receive a payment to show misogynistic narratives in the Bible.

[Basilissa]

Re: Open Letter to Catholics: Why Not Jesus?

No I cannot understand latin.

And yet you linked to publications in Italian - a language that is basically a modern dialect of Latin (along with other Romance languages).

Do you often link to publications in languages you don't understand? That could be a problem in regards to providing proper argumentation for your statements.

Basically Papa Cuckesco is promoting feminism since the day he was elected Pope. It's not a novelty, he promotes female studies all day long.

I would like to see proof of that. From the Pope's mouth, not from a newspaper.

There are alot of women that want to emerge in the hierarchies of the church

Now that would be something to see.

of course many women want to be funded to keep doing their so called "bible studies" where the only thing they do is to show proof that the Bible is "misogynistic" with a shitload of quotations. That's all they do, they just receive a payment to show misogynistic narratives in the Bible.

I don't understand the problem here - of course the Bible is misogynistic, duh! God is misogynistic. There's nothing wrong with that. Misogyny simply means acknowledging that women are inferior creatures created to serve men.

True problem is when people either ignore the - as you colorfully put it - "shitload of quotations," or try to argue that these verses don't say what they say.

And the - as you say - "shitload of quotations" provides a true - should we say - shitload of evidence for women's inferiority:

Genesis 2:18 And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.

Genesis 3:16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.

Exodus 20:17 Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's.
(Women are property. Less valuable than a house but more valuable than slaves and livestock.)

Matthew 18:25 But forasmuch as he had not to pay, his lord commanded him to be sold, and his wife, and children, and all that he had, and payment to be made.
(Jesus considers women (and children) to be property that can be sold.)

1st Corinthians 7:1 Now concerning the things whereof ye wrote unto me: It is good for a man not to touch a woman.
1st Corinthians 7:2 Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.

1st Corinthians 11:3 But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.
1st Corinthians 11:4 Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head.
1st Corinthians 11:5 But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.
1st Corinthians 11:6 For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.
1st Corinthians 11:7 For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man.
1st Corinthians 11:8 For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man.
1st Corinthians 11:9 Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.
1st Corinthians 11:10 For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head because of the angels.

1st Corinthians 14:34 Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law.
1st Corinthians 14:35 And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.

1st Timothy 2:9 In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array;
1st Timothy 2:10 But (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works.
1st Timothy 2:11 Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection.
1st Timothy 2:12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
1st Timothy 2:13 For Adam was first formed, then Eve.
1st Timothy 2:14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.
1st Timothy 2:15 Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.

Ephesians 5:22 Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.
Ephesians 5:23 For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.
Ephesians 5:24 Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.

Colossians 3:18 Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as it is fit in the Lord

Titus 2:3 The aged women likewise, that they be in behaviour as becometh holiness, not false accusers, not given to much wine, teachers of good things;
Titus 2:4 That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children,
Titus 2:5 To be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed.

1st Peter 3:1 Likewise, ye wives, be in subjection to your own husbands; that, if any obey not the word, they also may without the word be won by the conversation of the wives;
1st Peter 3:2 While they behold your chaste conversation coupled with fear.
1st Peter 3:3 Whose adorning let it not be that outward adorning of plaiting the hair, and of wearing of gold, or of putting on of apparel;
1st Peter 3:4 But let it be the hidden man of the heart, in that which is not corruptible, even the ornament of a meek and quiet spirit, which is in the sight of God of great price.
1st Peter 3:5 For after this manner in the old time the holy women also, who trusted in God, adorned themselves, being in subjection unto their own husbands:
1st Peter 3:6 Even as Sara obeyed Abraham, calling him lord: whose daughters ye are, as long as ye do well, and are not afraid with any amazement.

Revelation 14:4 These are they which were not defiled with women; for they are virgins. These are they which follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth. These were redeemed from among men, being the firstfruits unto God and to the Lamb.

[ERvengeanceDDR5]

Re: Open Letter to Catholics: Why Not Jesus?

And yet you linked to publications in Italian - a language that is basically a modern dialect of Latin

Yes bro it's from latin.



But I do not understand Latin fully, simply because I stopped studying it and I lost interest. I perceived the compulsory study of latin as a huge waste of my life. But, I can still understand it a bit. Not much of course, to improve I should restart from zero and refresh my memory. Not going to happen of course.



Of course I will never find a quotation where Cucked Pope says "I am a feminist and want to promote female leadershit". But I will find hundreds (if not thousands) of actions of this corrupted cuckold promoting the women in his mafia-like organization called "the church"

[Basilissa]

Re: Open Letter to Catholics: Why Not Jesus?

Yes bro it's from latin.

Oh dear. I'm not your "bro," which a) implies a much higher degree of familiarity than I'm comfortable with, and b) implies that I'm a male - but I'm not, I'm a lady.

But I do not understand Latin fully, simply because I stopped studying it and I lost interest. I perceived the compulsory study of latin as a huge waste of my life. But, I can still understand it a bit. Not much of course, to improve I should restart from zero and refresh my memory. Not going to happen of course.

The point is that you have cited a newspaper (not the official papal source) written in the modern dialect of Latin that is commonly referred to as Italian. I don't know why would you post these links if you don't understand that dialect? I did understand parts of it because Italian is so boringly similar to other dialects of Latin (Spanish, French, Portuguese).

Of course I will never find a quotation where Cucked Pope says "I am a feminist and want to promote female leadershit". But I will find hundreds (if not thousands) of actions of this corrupted cuckold promoting the women

That's nice, and you don't have to list all of them, but it would be nice if you could support your arguments with actual evidence.

You know, something like this:

Pope Francis: Female Catholic Priests Are Never Happening

So don’t get your hopes up.
Pope Francis said on Tuesday he believes the Roman Catholic Church’s ban on women becoming priests is forever and will never be changed, in some of his most definitive remarks on the issue.

Ups. It seems like I accidentally posted the evidence contradicting your statement. Oh well, silly me.

in his mafia-like organization called "the church"

The Catholic Church is not "mafia-like:" rather, it is the original Italian mafia, which officially split from the Christian church in AD 1054. They have been nothing but trouble since, give-or-take, AD 313, which is the first time they got a taste of political and economic power, to never let it go.

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: Open Letter to Catholics: Why Not Jesus?

[something about popes] Of course the "official" christians promote him

You seem to have this idea that catholics are Christians. As we've seen in another thread, because they make idols—as defined by God—and because this is such a major element in their creed, indeed I'd say it was the primary focus of everything they've ever built, it's impossible for them to be following Jesus Christ's ideas and therefore impossible for them to be Christians. How did we arrive at this conclusion? By looking at the place you suggested where they preserve art.

I am going to ask somebody about the bird with flashy sparks of light. I supposed it is a dove.

You cited Mark's Gospel as follows:

Mark 1:10 And straightway coming up out of the water, he saw the heavens opened, and the Spirit like a dove descending upon him

I know about the Spirit like a dove descending upon Jesus and so if that's what the wretched bird is supposed to be it is perhaps the most blasphemous object imaginable. As you will remember, we looked at The Ten Commandments.

Deuteronomy 5:8

Thou shalt not make thee any graven image,
or any likeness
of any thing
that is in heaven above,
or that is in the earth beneath,
or that is in the waters beneath the earth

A bird is a thing.

The verse divides up into six direct instructions, no interpretation needed from me, not to

• 8a make engraved or carved images

with an exhaustive list of subjects included. The word to look for is any. Claims that The Spirit is not a creature like a slug or a giraffe or even a human being are disingenuous. Either they're lies about the idol itself, knowing full well what it is, or they're lies about Bible knowledge. Whatever the bird is, a sparrow, a penguin or The Holy Ghost visiting the earth temporarily, it's prohibited as much for what it is as for its location

• 8c of any thing
• 8d in heaven (The Holy Ghost when not on earth)
• 8e on earth (The Holy Ghost whether appearing as a bird or not) (and birds)
• 8f swimming in the waters

so the passage about doves is irrelevant. God could turn up as a fish and just because it was God would not mean it could be an idol because God also lives in Heaven and because fish are prohibited anyway. Christians don't need to think about this, simply read The Bible and it's right there. You seem to have a fascination with profligate wives. How do you understand Paul's message to the flock in Galatia?

Galatians 3:26 – 4:1 Ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus. For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise. Now I say, That the heir, as long as he is a child, differeth nothing from a servant, though he be lord of all

[handmaiden]

Re: Open Letter to Catholics: Why Not Jesus?

One blatant non-Biblical heresy that the Catholics promote is the idea that Mary, the female that God used to gestate His Son, was born without sin, thus making her "worthy" to carry Our Savior.

Of course, if she were, in any way, "without sin", then she could have died for our sins and there would have been no reason for Jesus to die or be born in the first place.

The whole thing makes no sense and I honestly do not know how the Catholic Church as managed to keep going given its delusional doctrines. Of course, they had an army almost from the get go. Then, they had enormous wealth and political power. Now, they are down to just enormous wealth.

What they do not have is Biblically sound doctrine. Therefore, despite what ever lip service they may have paid over the millennia, they do not have Jesus. Ergo, they cannot be credited as being Christians.

Please note: Not one point or fact or idea expressed above is original. It's all been discussed before and can be reviewed on a number of different threads here in LBC. I just thought that I would reiterate some of the basic information for any readers of this current thread.