OUTRAGEOUS rewriting of history by the RED MAN, Kent Monkman

[Mistress Cookie]

This is a disgusting outrage ! ! !

The "artist" Kent Monkman has taken to rewriting how the Godly™ settlers tamed the wild savage known as the American Indian by doing a series of canvases that show the situation as he would like to see it ! ! !

Will these pictures be put in textbooks, next?? Why are they even allowed to be exhibited?? It is SLANDER!! I hope our lawyers and the DoF will get on this right away.

I can't tell you how upset this has got me.
OUTRAGEOUS rewriting of history by the RED MAN, Kent Monkma

[Redeemed Papist]

Re: OUTRAGEOUS rewriting of history by the RED MAN, Kent Monkman

Even atheists can't find this funny, surely!

[Brother Enoch]

Re: OUTRAGEOUS rewriting of history by the RED MAN, Kent Monkman

Isn't he a Canadian Injun? I thought they just painted on the walls of their caves and igloos.

[Mistress Cookie]

Re: OUTRAGEOUS rewriting of history by the RED MAN, Kent Monkman

Isn't he a Canadian Injun?

Did they have Indians in Canada ? ? ?

Then why are they called "Native Americans" ? ? ?

Can we send ours over there? Maybe they crossed over illegally before the Mayflower landed.

At any rate, it's disgusting. And there are a lot of other homo-friendly paintings in Mr. Monkman's series. I can't bring myself to post more of them here, though. It's just so wrong.

[Proud Faroese]

Re: OUTRAGEOUS rewriting of history by the RED MAN, Kent Monkman

I actually found an intresting article about how commie countries makes movies that glorifiy injuns

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ostern#The_Ostern_and_the_Revisionist_Western

There is some divergence between the true Red Western and the true Eastern in their portrayal of certain subject matter.
Proper Red Westerns share some features in common with the general Revisionist Western, notably, a more sympathetic portrayal of working people, native Americans, and Mexicans. In the true Red Western more focus was put on the lawlessness of the time period, favoring realism over romanticism.
With the true "Ostern" ("Eastern"), some of these tendencies may be reversed, particularly in reference to Soviet history and particularly in the context of the Russian Civil War and Basmachi rebellion. Sympathy for the working class is obviously paramount, but it is also common to romanticise and stereotype non-Russian characters. Thus, Osterns often cast Russian or Jewish actors in prominent "ethnic" parts. Spartak Mishulin, who plays Sayid in White Sun of the Desert, and Konstantin Raikin, who plays Kayum in At Home among Strangers, are just some examples of this (compare Eli Wallach in The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly). At Home among Strangers, for example, whilst critically acclaimed, has a very one-sided view of its period, which was partly due to political pressure.
What they both share with the revisionist Western, includes a disdain for the business class (cf Once Upon a Time in the West and its critique of the rail builders), organised religion and Christianity and the so called "American Dream" and its related ethic.
There is also some common ground with the Zapata Western genre, which is often related to the Mexican Revolution, notably A Fistful of Dynamite which is a serious, non-romanticized look at revolution.
In Dauria (1971), Siberian Cossacks are acting like American cowboys: horseriding, fighting, shooting, and even robbing a bank.



Making movies like that is like spitting in the face of all Americans, the only true portrayal of injuns is movies with Godly John Wayne.

[Brother Enoch]

Re: OUTRAGEOUS rewriting of history by the RED MAN, Kent Monkman

Did they have Indians in Canada ? ? ?

Then why are they called "Native Americans" ? ? ?

Can we send ours over there? Maybe they crossed over illegally before the Mayflower landed.

Dear Cookie, we have enough too many already! On welfare check day there are thousands of them littering the streets unconscious, covered in vomit, whiskey and glue. Talk about a driving hazard! Hitting one of them at highway speed can completely throw out your wheel alignment, and who needs that expense? And you even get a fine for running them over!

At any rate, it's disgusting. And there are a lot of other homo-friendly paintings in Mr. Monkman's series. I can't bring myself to post more of them here, though. It's just so wrong.

Lord forgive me, but I wish all injuns were homers. That way there wouldn't be any more of them in 40 years (the maximum injun lifespan)

[Proud Faroese]

Re: OUTRAGEOUS rewriting of history by the RED MAN, Kent Monkman

I have a questin about injuns:
Why do they "dress" like homers?

[Brother Enoch]

Re: OUTRAGEOUS rewriting of history by the RED MAN, Kent Monkman

I have a questin about injuns:
Why do they "dress" like homers?

Most of them aren't wearing anything at all on welfare check day. That's what they do - get drunk or high on glue, fornicate with anything with a pulse, then pass out naked all over the streets.

[Redeemed Papist]

Re: OUTRAGEOUS rewriting of history by the RED MAN, Kent Monkman

I have a questin about injuns:
Why do they "dress" like homers?

It's so obvious.

[Mistress Cookie]

Re: OUTRAGEOUS rewriting of history by the RED MAN, Kent Monkman

This is who makes "art" these days. In the old days the sicko artiste's married, and at least lived a normal life on the surface, and society was spared the Double Whammy.

Now it's as if anything goes

Meet Miss Chief / Kent Monkman

[Pastor Isaac Peters]

Re: OUTRAGEOUS rewriting of history by the RED MAN, Kent Monkman

I did a Web search for that depraved redskin's "art" (and as a pastor, I have the unlocking code for the JesOS™ porn filter). True Christian™ women and children, please stop reading.


















It was full of scenes of savages engaged in sodomite rape against white male settlers. Men, that is what will happen if we let loose our grip on the injuns. Could they have telegraphed their punches any more clearly?

[Zaiger]

Re: OUTRAGEOUS rewriting of history by the RED MAN, Kent Monkman

Well like most people that are trying to upset good Christians he got it wrong. The picture clearly shows an injun spanking a modern day Canadian Mountie which leads me to believe that he is not trynig to rewrite history but rather document what those disgusting Canadians do with their free time.