Originally posted by ChurchLighteningRod
View Post
X
-
Re: THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER - SATAN'S STARGATE!
-
Re: THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER - SATAN'S STARGATE!
Originally posted by Deaner View PostI don't have to prove you wrong; you have to prove yourself right. All you've done is show blurry pictures of God knows what and link to some obscure scientific hooey. You've done nothing but sit on your ass like you know it all. You will rot in hell.
Like I said, I think the fact that this computer works is proof that I'm right. Your turn.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER - SATAN'S STARGATE!
Originally posted by ChurchLighteningRod View PostSo, well, this is missing the point. I'm asking how you could make a computer work, without using the atomic theory of matter. As far as I'm concerned, the fact that my computer works is proof a plenty that the atomic theory is right. I'm asking for you to prove me wrong.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER - SATAN'S STARGATE!
Originally posted by Deaner View PostI'm not the one claiming molecules exist. Semi-conductors exist, I admit that. Where did I ever say I could build one?
I don't believe in atoms. (Or molecules, radios, bats, etc.)
So, well, says I, how come this computer works (given that scientists came up with the idea of the semiconductor through using atomic theory) if atomic theory is wrong? You said something like,
I don't need no scientists telling me how semiconductors work, I can buy them and plug them in.
So, well, this is missing the point. I'm asking how you could make a computer work, without using the atomic theory of matter. As far as I'm concerned, the fact that my computer works is proof a plenty that the atomic theory is right. I'm asking for you to prove me wrong.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER - SATAN'S STARGATE!
Originally posted by ChurchLighteningRod View PostAh, ah, ah, no, I asked first. It's only polite.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER - SATAN'S STARGATE!
Originally posted by Deaner View PostYou show me a molecule first. No pictures allowed.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER - SATAN'S STARGATE!
Originally posted by Deaner View PostSo you believe the microscope tells you the truth; do you talk to crystal balls as well?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER - SATAN'S STARGATE!
Originally posted by Deaner View PostThat's a care bear. How can you say it's a molecule? As a matter of fact, how do you know what a molecule looks like when you keep telling everybody they're invisible? What kind of idiots would believe in something that you can't see?
Like I said - do you believe in microscopes?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER - SATAN'S STARGATE!
Originally posted by Deaner View PostEverybody knows how a semi-conductor works, I don't need hundreds of scientists working together to tell me how. You plug the damn thing in. For smaller electronics you use batteries.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER - SATAN'S STARGATE!
Originally posted by ChurchLighteningRod View PostTake a good look though, minus the care bear, this is a molecule. Get used to the idea, it's useful.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER - SATAN'S STARGATE!
Originally posted by Deaner View PostThat's very funny. Are you retarded?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER - SATAN'S STARGATE!
Originally posted by ChurchLighteningRod View PostJust in case you're wondering why I say that a computer requires the atomic theory of matter: http://www.howstuffworks.com/diode.htm
Leave a comment:
-
Re: THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER - SATAN'S STARGATE!
Originally posted by Ebenezer Wright View PostOh my! Its not another one of those gay carebears that use to be so popular is it?
[ATTACH]6091[/ATTACH]
This could really be anything kiddo.
Well, yeah, people do have a tendency to identify new concepts with comfortable ones. Take a good look though, minus the care bear, this is a molecule. Get used to the idea, it's useful.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: