[Deaner]

Re: THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER - SATAN'S STARGATE!

As requested, here I hold in my hand about 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 molecules, sorry there might be one or two missing, I lost count after the first 100,000,000,000,000,000.

That's very funny. Are you retarded?

[ChurchLighteningRod]

Re: THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER - SATAN'S STARGATE!

So this fuzzy piece of crap is your "proof" of molecules?? It looks like a kitchen light taken out of focus. Do you think we're a bunch of idiots? If molecules exist show me a picture of you holding some in your hands. Got a web cam?

As requested, here I hold in my hand about 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 molecules, sorry there might be one or two missing, I lost count after the first 100,000,000,000,000,000.

[Ebenezer Wright]

Re: THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER - SATAN'S STARGATE!

Oh my! Its not another one of those gay carebears that use to be so popular is it?




This could really be anything kiddo.

[ChurchLighteningRod]

Re: THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER - SATAN'S STARGATE!

So this fuzzy piece of crap is your "proof" of molecules?? It looks like a kitchen light taken out of focus. Do you think we're a bunch of idiots? If molecules exist show me a picture of you holding some in your hands. Got a web cam?

Okay, so because it's fuzzy, that makes it less of a molecule then? I assure you, it's not a kitchen light. Do you believe in microscopes?

[ChurchLighteningRod]

Re: THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER - SATAN'S STARGATE!

Just in case you're wondering why I say that a computer requires the atomic theory of matter: http://www.howstuffworks.com/diode.htm . How do you explain that? Here's the picture: Thousand of the world's brightest scientists spend decades trying to work out and discover the atomic theory - they are finally able to make a device (a computer) PURELY on the basis of that theory - with the aim of making mankinds life easier. Et voila! The device works exactly as they predicted. Some time later a confused individual turns on such a machine and posts an electron-ic message on a massive worldwide network of these machines in which he claims that the atomic theory of matter is clearly rubbish, because it can't be explained in terms of basketballs and marbles. I don't know why scientists bother *rolls eyes*.

[Deaner]

Re: THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER - SATAN'S STARGATE!

Never seen molecules, eh? Well if you care to step this way,

A Naphthalocyanine molecule image taken with an electron microscope (works on the same principles as an optical microscope): http://www.vladimirpetkovic.com/blog...8/22262wss.jpg (NOT A COMPUTER GENERATED IMAGE)

So this fuzzy piece of crap is your "proof" of molecules?? It looks like a kitchen light taken out of focus. Do you think we're a bunch of idiots? If molecules exist show me a picture of you holding some in your hands. Got a web cam?

[ChurchLighteningRod]

Re: THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER - SATAN'S STARGATE!

Never seen molecules, eh? Well if you care to step this way,

A Naphthalocyanine molecule image taken with an electron microscope (works on the same principles as an optical microscope): http://www.vladimirpetkovic.com/blog...8/22262wss.jpg (NOT A COMPUTER GENERATED IMAGE)

But I guess some of you don't believe in microscopes...Really, you do make me giggle (not with you),

And an image of some bacteria (actually this is a strange image posted on a blog): http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2191/...fc809a88_o.jpg

Or `micro demons' as you seem to like calling them - ho,ho,ho...

Also, a quick thought on your `proof' against the atomic model: Yes, matter is made out of different re-arrangements of the same things (protons, neutrons and electrons) - but why should a different arrangement have the same properties? Butter, cheese, and cream are all made from exactly the same thing, but you wouldn't make coffee and put cheese in it. Well, maybe some of you do...

Also, you may not know this, but the computer you are using to read this message was built by scientists using the atomic model in it's most explicit and sophisticated form. If the atomic model was wrong, the computer wouldn't work...


[IMG]file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/Zebedee/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot.jpg[/IMG]

[Remy Lebeau]

Re: THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER - SATAN'S STARGATE!

I might not be a scientist that works in a research lab or making theoretically models but I worked in various production labs for some years, so don't tell me that atoms don't exists or what they do.

So in other words, you have never done any testing yourself to prove the existence of atoms?

Debunking of atomism? He thinks he can explain such a complex matter with a quote on marbles and basketballs? Ridicules to say the least.

What is ridiculous is the notion that a supposed cluster of electrons, protons, and neutrons are going to magically transform into completely different matter if arranged differently. At the end of the day you would still just have electrons, protons, and neutrons. No smooth taking or pseudo scientific babble is going to change that fact.

Face the objective truth. Electrons, protons, and neutrons are electrons, protons, and neutrons. No matter how many you have or how they are arranged they are still just electrons, protons, and neutrons. I only see the possibility for 3 substances in that model. But obviously we have hundreds of different substances.

Many processes need a form of activation with use of a catalyst, need purification or even more complex processes, it's not just drop all the stuff in a bucket and voilà, some processes need dozens of steps to get the right configuration of molecules. If he really wants to show that there aren't any atoms he will have to devise a test to do so, merely saying so is just not gonna cut it.

But you merely saying that atoms do exist does cut it? Hypocrite.

Even the most common processes use atoms to actually work, how else for instance would a photographic negative turn out?

I saw this on Myth Busters. The absence of light, a base, and an acid. This process does not in any way prove that atoms exist.

Not by some Godly work but simply because you convert silverhalide atoms into silver atoms by means of a developer and in the second phase being disolved by the fixer you use thus creating a negative image.

There are only 3 possible substances if we use the atomic theory. So according to you silver and silver halide makes two. What is the third substance? Water? I guess everything else is made out of silver and silver halide?

Without atomic interaction such a manouvre would not be possible.

Appearently, it would. Because there is no such thing as an atom.

but maybe all this is beyond your grasp and you don't understand it, so you are simply deny something you don't understand.

It is beyond everyones' understanding because it contradicts reality itself. You cannot comprehend that which is incomprehensible. You read about atoms in some scientific journal and made a choice to blindly believe in them without any proof other than some scientist's say so.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER - SATAN'S STARGATE!

but maybe all this is beyond your grasp and you don't understand it, so you are simply deny something you don't understand.

Just like you reject Christ because you don't understand.

John 8:43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word. 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. 8:45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.

[Teflon©]

Re: THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER - SATAN'S STARGATE!

Again, you compare something that has "tangible" effects to something that not only makes no sense, but has no "tangible" effects. Did you even read Brother Brook's debunking of atomism? He pretty much put the last nail in the coffin of that idiotic theory.

I might not be a scientist that works in a research lab or making theoretically models but I worked in various production labs for some years, so don't tell me that atoms don't exists or what they do. Debunking of atomism? He thinks he can explain such a complex matter with a quote on marbles and basketballs? Ridicules to say the least. Many processes need a form of activation with use of a catalyst, need purification or even more complex processes, it's not just drop all the stuff in a bucket and voilà, some processes need dozens of steps to get the right configuration of molecules. If he really wants to show that there aren't any atoms he will have to devise a test to do so, merely saying so is just not gonna cut it. Even the most common processes use atoms to actually work, how else for instance would a photographic negative turn out? Not by some Godly work but simply because you convert silverhalide atoms into silver atoms by means of a developer and in the second phase being disolved by the fixer you use thus creating a negative image. Without atomic interaction such a manouvre would not be possible. but maybe all this is beyond your grasp and you don't understand it, so you are simply deny something you don't understand.

[Nobar King]

Re: THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER - SATAN'S STARGATE!

Are they ever going to turn on that Hadron collider and destroy all those gays, anyway? It seems like they're waiting for something special to happen. Just light it off, guys. We'll take care of the refuse, afterwards.

[Star Finder]

Re: THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER - SATAN'S STARGATE!

(– Huh! Even the new VP knows that!

no this is "expalin".. i.e. after palin..

[Born Again Bob]

Re: THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER - SATAN'S STARGATE!

Dear Friend,

The 2000 census list 658,000 gay households.

10 years from now, there won't be any at all.

Praise His name!

Yours in Him,
bab <-----

[friendofdorothy]

Re: THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER - SATAN'S STARGATE!

Where does that figure come from?

The one in to number is a pretty common figure. The 2000 census list 658,000 gay households.

[Bob4God]

Re: THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER - SATAN'S STARGATE!

REV Why don't you just admit you are a gay man yourself. you look like a big old queer.

The good Reverend is NOT gay!!!!