[JennyD]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

I never said I wanted to get rid of men - only that this proves that men aren't indispensable to racial survival.
So there.

I always knew you were some sort of a Pagan Supremacist!

Once again, both are fairytales. The only difference is that once is openly acknowledged as this, whereas people stubbornly insist on believing the other literally.

You can fit a person into a whale's stomach whole. You can NOT fit two people into a wolf's stomach, even chewed up.

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

And ants aren't the only creatures to have done away with males. There are some kinds of lizards, for example, who have no males in their species, too: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/135/3499/212

And, there's evidence to suggest that human males are slowly going extinct, as well. The Y chromosome used to carry much more genetic material thousands of years ago than it does today; the X chromosome, however, is still just as strong as it was. And there are fewer boys being born than girls. And since, thanks to new developments in science using bone marrow to create gametes (allowing women to create their own sperm and thus to reproduce), we won't really be needing you people (i.e. men) very much longer. True, your services will be missed, but given that you are all a nuisance to society and the driving force behind the death of this planet, you yourselves certainly won't be. But don't worry boys, your extinction will take quite a while: estimates indicate you'll be here to be a pain in our asses for another 100,000 years or so.

*Gasps* Zeke, that was uncalled for!

This wonderful post of Alie's deserves a bump.
See, boys?
The evidence is all against you.

Although I'm sure you'll be missed. Dildos just aren't the same.

I always knew you were some sort of a Pagan Supremacist!

Ladies and gentlemen, here we have Jenny.
Jenny adds 1+1.
As her answer, Jenny gets 72. *snicker*

You can fit a person into a whale's stomach whole. You can NOT fit two people into a wolf's stomach, even chewed up.

And how do you know that was *always* the case? Maybe wolves were bigger back then!

Although the reality of the situation is a person wouldn't survive long in a whale's stomach without the internal acids digesting them. But primitives (like the people who wrote the bible) wouldn't have known this.

[Nobar King]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

Bla, bla, bla, did I miss something?

[John Bois Ward]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

These so-called all female species of ants and lizards are typical hoaxes created by atheistic scientists. Like Piltdown Man and the earth being older than 10,000 years, these fantasies were created to lead astray the feeble minded (children, women, mentally retarded, etc). Simple logic demonstrates that an all female species is a fallacy.

As seen in Genesis 7:2 -Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee by sevens, the male and his female: and of beasts that are not clean by two, the male and his female - the male possesses the female. In other words, the female is a possession and the male is a possessor. You cannot have a possession without a possessor; therefore, you cannot have a female without a male.

We have - logic
You have - a woman's brain

We win.

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

Bla, bla, bla, did I miss something?

What a meaningful contribution to my thread. Sir, I am in awe. If I wore a hat, I'd take it off to you. Why haven't you won a nobel prize yet? Surely Einstein himself could not compare to you!

[Nobar King]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

You don't scare me, woman.

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

You don't scare me, woman.

I wasn't trying to.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

I'm starting to think the entire forum should be a men-only zone. We wouldn't be losing much.

That's just ridiculous.....

You call the Holocaust ridiculous? You think the deaths of up to 100 Jews is something to "lol" at? You pagan supremacists really are full of hate, aren't you?

[Nobar King]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

I'm starting to think the entire forum should be a men-only zone. We wouldn't be losing much.

Are you suggesting that the women are winning this argument?

[Pastor Isaac Peters]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

But don't worry boys, your extinction will take quite a while: estimates indicate you'll be here to be a pain in our asses for another 100,000 years or so.

That's just sick-ularist silly talk. Long before then, we'll have been raptured, and the end of all things will have come. Of course, by "we" I mean the first-person plural exclusive rather than the first-person plural inclusive; no one expects either you or Mrs. Van Hellbound to be raptured.

[WickedWitch]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

Are you suggesting that the women are winning this argument?

We are. That's probably because your defective Y chromosomes are preventing you from providing proper support for your arguments against your extinction.

That's just sick-ularist silly talk. Long before then, we'll have been raptured, and the end of all things will have come. Of course, by "we" I mean the first-person plural exclusive rather than the first-person plural inclusive; no one expects either you or Mrs. Van Hellbound to be raptured.

No, we won't. And that's because there isn't going to be a Rapture.

[Pastor Isaac Peters]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

No, we won't. And that's because there isn't going to be a Rapture.

Care to prove it?

[Brother Temperance]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

Are you suggesting that the women are winning this argument?

No, I'm suggesting that women create unnecessary arguments where only peace and harmony would exist otherwise.

We are. That's probably because your defective Y chromosomes are preventing you from providing proper support for your arguments against your extinction.

Just like your defective man-parts prevent you from having a proper defence against getting slapped in the face, eh?

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

I'm starting to think the entire forum should be a men-only zone. We wouldn't be losing much.

Oh, you'd miss us. You know you would.

You call the Holocaust ridiculous? You think the deaths of up to 100 Jews is something to "lol" at? You pagan supremacists really are full of hate, aren't you?

Not at all.
What's ridiculous is the fact that you call this man her granddaddy just because of the name. Is everyone called 'Smith' related?

[LITTLEONION]

Re: Evolution proves men not so essential as you might think!

I know I would miss you gals. Who would wash my underpants,and still love me afterwords?