[sumdumgai808]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Friend, I have tested the 'evolutionist' claims. I had a jar of peanut butter. I let it in the sun for a month. No person climbed out of the jar.
The only thing that happened is some of the field beaners 'feigned' stomach cramps from the sandwiches I had some of the kids sell them when the experiment was over.

I do not doubt people would have claimed to have stomach cramps after consuming peanut butter, especially if it was exposed. All kinds of bacteria or dust could have built up on top of it - though I am sure you are aware of that. I have no doubt that you are an intelligent person however I think you misunderstand how evolution works.

If you wish to see evidence of micro evolution, you shouldn't have to look any further than the kids you had sell those sandwiches. Those kids would have taken different traits from their parents. However macro evolution (which I'm assuming you were trying to prove with a "person climbing out of the jar) cannot be done in a month's span. Macro evolution takes place over an extremely long period of time. Sadly not quick enough to be observe the noticeable changes between species.

If you are genuinely interested in it, I would recommend you read up on it. There are many ways to gain that kind of information. It can be an interesting read to see how things adapt to survive an ever changing world.

[James Hutchins]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Friend, I have tested the 'evolutionist' claims. I had a jar of peanut butter. I let it in the sun for a month. No person climbed out of the jar.
The only thing that happened is some of the field beaners 'feigned' stomach cramps from the sandwiches I had some of the kids sell them when the experiment was over.

[sumdumgai808]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Therein lies the darwinist's kriptonite. There hasn't been a long enough time for this so-called, "macro-evolution" to have occurred.

If you're going by the bible's count of history then yes. However most evolutionists do not look to the bible as a source of evidence. Evolutionists back up their findings through the scientific process and share their knowledge with others so that others can agree, disagree, prove or disprove their findings.

If I had to explain it in another way, it would be like a jigsaw puzzle of someone's face. Eventually you'll get to a point where it's obviously someone's face. Although you may not have finished it to say whether or not if that person is angry or happy - you already know that it's going to be someone's face. That's how the scientific theory of evolution came about (scientific theory is much different than a regular theory). They've taken all these "pieces" left behind by our ancestors and have managed to get an idea on what the completed puzzle is like, even if some pieces may be missing.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Macro evolution happens over the course of a long period of time.

Therein lies the darwinist's kriptonite. There hasn't been a long enough time for this so-called, "macro-evolution" to have occurred.

[sumdumgai808]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Typical evolutionary conjecture and guesswork. Can you show me this happening today, God-hater? You must be millions and millions of years old in order to have empirical first-hand evidence of your flim-flam theory.

Actually, it's happening every day and all around you. You just need to know what to look for. There are two types of evolution, micro evolution which takes place in a much shorter time frame and macro evolution which is what most people relate to when they think of evolution.

Micro evolution happens daily. Bacteria and viruses can mutate into something new, something that could get us sick or simply be kicked back by our own immune system. Even a human family can show micro evolution. Two different people with different traits, say the father has blonde hair and hazel eyes and the mother has brown hair and blue eyes. Their children could have blonde hair and blue eyes or brown hair and hazel eyes. Most people don't think of that as evolution, but it is still a form of it. Over time, those small and seemingly unimportant changes could eventually lead to macro evolution.

Macro evolution happens over the course of a long period of time. All of those small seemingly unimportant changes could eventually lead to something drastic over time. Much like how running water can change a rough and sharp rock into a smooth stone over time. Since humans haven't started recording their history until the more recent centuries, the only way we see Macro evolution at work is through the fossils and remains of more ancient species. In the future it'll probably be easier to prove since we have started recording more detailed information about biology and those in the future will be able to compare their information with ours long after we have moved on.

[Brother Harold Porter]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Actually my friend, much like how humans, apes, and monkeys have a common ancestor but are now are different species, you could say the same thing about plants if you go further back in time to the earliest and simplest forms of life such as bacteria. The bacteria would eventually evolve into more complex forms of life leading to the different species that would eventually populate the planet... or die off in extinction if they were not able to adapt and survive their predators and their environment.

Typical evolutionary conjecture and guesswork. Can you show me this happening today, God-hater? You must be millions and millions of years old in order to have empirical first-hand evidence of your flim-flam theory.

[sumdumgai808]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

So I'm supposed to take someone seriously that says trees are my distant cousins?

We all have a common ancestor. His name was Noah.

Actually my friend, much like how humans, apes, and monkeys have a common ancestor but are now are different species, you could say the same thing about plants if you go further back in time to the earliest and simplest forms of life such as bacteria. The bacteria would eventually evolve into more complex forms of life leading to the different species that would eventually populate the planet... or die off in extinction if they were not able to adapt and survive their predators and their environment.

[Redeemed Papist]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

So I'm supposed to take someone seriously that says trees are my distant cousins?

We all have a common ancestor. His name was Noah.

[Franklen Mann]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Oh wow, somebody that actually asks for answers, let me tell you something, I like you for being at least a little open minded, some is better than nothing after all. ANYWAY, back to the questions you want answered, and I am not debating, I am simply answering his questions.
I can answer some but not all, anyway here we go!

Account for fools If evolution is survival of the fittest then how do explain the continued survival of unsuccessful groups of stupid humans?

Because the smart humans originally survived, but once we became civilized enough to survive most animals, enough stupid people barely survived to reproduce, in turn allowing there existence to be continued.

Explain infant murder If we are evolved to nature our young then how do you secular humanist explain your groups pathological desire to kill yours with abortions?

When we where young as a species, we were incapable of killing our young without killing ourselves, and at the time sex and survival where two very important things to the human race.

Why no bodies? If humanity was roughly a million people living at one time. If the human race is 150,000 years old like you maintain that means there have been 150,000,000,000 who lived before the current era. If each corpse takes up 3 by 6 feet then that means the remains of human ancestors cover 1350 billion square feet of the earth! Why are we not buried under the remains of 150 billion people?

Human bodies degrade, as do all bodies, which produce fossil fuels and other things, bacteria and high pressure help speed up this process, so our younger generations bodies fade away.
Now of course there is still bodies to be found, skeletons and such, but keep in mind we started in VERY small numbers, which slowly grew over time. With the skeletons of our evolutionary ancestors being proof, combined with the fact that a lot of materials covers up skeletons over time, that's why they can be up to a mile under ground.

Why don't we act like monkeys If we are evolved from monkeys why do we behave like them; service our selves constantly an throw our feces about? Asked by Eight or Better Why are there still monkey? Evolution predicts the stronger species (humans) would crush and exterminate the weaker species(monkeys) it evolved from. Asked by ChristianSoldier

I'm going to hit two birds with one stone on this one, that is a misreading, according to evolution monkeys and humans have similar ancestors, in turn we DID NOT evolve from monkeys, but we did come from another older species split off in to two evolutionary chains, both of which survived, monkeys and humans.

Please account for quick extinctions. According to evolution theory it takes millions of years for a species to go extinct. Yet we have examples of species dying out in a few hunderd years like the Dodo. Please account for this.

That's simple, human intervention causes more animals to die, and in turn quicker extinction.

Explain wasps with evolution. Wasp paralyze spiders and then implant their young in them to feed on living, but helpless insect. If evolution was true them spiders would have anti-wasp poison in their blood. But they don’t. The only way you can get such a horrific death as those countless spiders suffer is threw the power of God. Account for the missing land sharks If we evolved from fish, why haven’t sharks, who according to your theory predate us, evolved into land animals and are hunting us?

Another simple one, evolutionary changes are mutations, and are 100% random, the species doesn't wake up one day thinking "oh hey, I should have anti-spider venom in my stinger!" they happen randomly, some don't work and that subspecies dies, and by a rare stroke of luck some get a trait that helps them survive.

What is the evolutionary advantage of demonic possession Please explain how demonic possesions humans, horses, dogs and pigs helps them to be a more successful species. asked by Virginia D. Templeton 6/8/07

Some evolutional changes can be negative, plus I doubt there would be a change in genetic code that would alot for resistance to demons.

Do you believe that Jesus was more primitive and less "fit" than today's slugs and worms? Christ earthly ministery was 2,000 years ago, a more primitive time than now. asked by Virginia D. Templeton 6/8/07

Simple answer, no. It's not so much physical fitness as it is how long we live, we had a very short lifespan back then, but Jesus would be exempt from this rule and therefore live longer.

What did the rocks and lightning evolve from? According to evolutionary theory, all life evolved out of rocks and lightning,Please show the evolutionary linage and transitional forums for rocks and lighting. asked by Virginia D. Templeton 6/8/07

Rocks and Lightning didn't evolve, they aren't living. You'll have to look in to how scientists explain the creation of the earth for that one.

Explain why human's aren't perfect If we are evolving why don’t we have third arms now?

Because evolution is random, maybe we did have three arms at some point, who knows?
But if the ones that had that particular evolution died, their trait died with them.
Plus you are thinking of practical usage, we would have use for three arms at home, for survival it does nothing but hinder us.

Were are ancestors and fossilizes remains of the dragon, satyr and unicorn? I would say the lack of fossils for these three creatures presents a clear gap in the record.

Fun fact, I'm not sure about all of them, but we do have fossil record of a unicorn, also unicorn is actually a mistranslation, their Hebrew name was re'em and they do exist as described in the bible, however bicorn would be a more fitting name, because what you call "unicorn" was sometimes, but not always, described as having two horns.
Their scientific name is Bos primigenius, and the're referred to as Aurochs. I would go more into it, but I have some more questions to answer from you and I'm sure you can do some more research yourself.

Why don't chemicals think? If our brains are just a mishmash of biochemistry, how come chemicals like gasoline or bug spray can't think? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10

Because that would just be silly you silly! That is more saying that the chemicals influence our emotions, they aren't our thoughts themselves, I haven't studied deep enough into neurology to answer that completely, but chemicals aren't our thoughts, they just effect our emotions, our brain releases them under certain conditions and the release results in certain emotions due to the chemicals affecting our brain.
I would answer more but I think I have done enough for now, if you stayed long enough and read the whole thing, thanks for hearing me out, if not oh well.

[Didymus Much]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

..."Where are the flying fish today?" They cannot answer

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_fish

[death to witches]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Evolution says fish jumped out of the water to bite at bugs above the water. Then they say these fish developed wings

I ask them

"Where are the flying fish today?" They cannot answer

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Something tells me you are being deliberately stupid to be vexatious.

or vice versa

[Redeemed Papist]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Who the hell are Darwinists and what did I say about them?

You said they don't believe we evolved from fish which is spectacularly wrong.

Something tells me you are being deliberately stupid to be vexatious.

[Athannihilate]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Bullshit! Seriously. You aren't even informed about that. Evolution of vertebrates hinges on the idea that once there were only fish and then later on there were amphibians descended from those fish then reptiles etc etc. I know it's ridiculous compared to the word of God but if you're going to refute Darwinists you really do need to know just how bananas they actually are.

Do you know anything at all?

Who the hell are Darwinists and what did I say about them?

[Redeemed Papist]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Evolution states that organisms evolve. That;s it. Some evolutionists believe we DID evolve from fish, but only the vast minority.

Bullshit! Seriously. You aren't even informed about that. Evolution of vertebrates hinges on the idea that once there were only fish and then later on there were amphibians descended from those fish then reptiles etc etc. I know it's ridiculous compared to the word of God but if you're going to refute Darwinists you really do need to know just how bananas they actually are.

Do you know anything at all?