Originally posted by logo73
View Post
X
-
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Put some cold water on it, it'll soon go down
-
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
So what's your plan for not burning in Hell?Originally posted by logo73 View PostA load of old toss.
Revelation 21:8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.Maybe you didn't know because nobody witnessed effectively to you before but Jesus is coming back and could be here any time now and this is what's in store for you when He does. You're not going to enjoy that one bit.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View PostHere is some questions for the scientific theocrats of the Darwinist Gestapo to try and answer;
Account for the missing land sharks
If we evolved from fish, why haven’t sharks, who according to your theory predate us, evolved into land animals and are hunting us?
The competition between predator and prey is going on in all media - water, land, air. So, the first animals to get out of the ocean were also part of that. And indeed fish were not the first ones - arthopods were. Or why are bird spiders not really toxic to humans? When they crawled on land, mammals didn't exist. So, their venom is not adapted to mammals.
Oh, sure it happened. But it was not a worldwide flood. People of that time just thought it was worldwide as they missed the satellites to look.Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
Explain floods on Mars with out the Great Flood of the Bible
If Noah’s flood didn’t happen then how do explain the evidence of a great flood on Mars?[/
)To invent a knife or to make fire is not 'stupid'. In fact evolution teaches, that it's neither less nor worth more than a claw or venom. It's just one method to survive in a world without any Fast Food chain around the corner.....
Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View PostAccount for fools
If evolution is survival of the fittest then how do explain the continued survival of unsuccessful groups of stupid humans?We are perfect enough to survive with two. And (most) beings are symmetric.
Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View PostExplain why human's aren't perfect
If we are evolving why don’t we have third arms now?Who is eating grass? The buffalos and gnus. Who is eating the buffalos? The lions do. And who is the predator of the lions? Well, that lions are.... Understood?
Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View PostExplain infant murder
If we are evolved to nature our young then how do you secular humanist explain your groups pathological desire to kill yours with abortions?
Bacteria ate them. Fossils are really rarely forming. So, all these people and animals were mineralized again.Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View PostWhy no bodies?
If humanity was roughly a million people living at one time. If the human race is 150,000 years old like you maintain that means there have been 150,000,000,000 who lived before the current era. If each corpse takes up 3 by 6 feet then that means the remains of human ancestors cover 1350 billion square feet of the earth! Why are we not buried under the remains of 150 billion people?They just have the same fate as Darth Wader. They never existed.Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View PostWere do angels and demons fit into the Evolutionist tree of life?
Please explain the earliest common ancestor with all animals, angles and demons. What is their ancestry and transitional form?In face we are doing. But we don't mind or remember that. We are showing the same mimics and signs, when we won (e.g. in sports) and the same movements, when we fail. Our faces are similar, when expressing anger, fear or joy. And apes are able to understand our expressions.
Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View PostWhy don't we act like monkeys
If we are evolved from monkeys why do we behave like them; service our selves constantly an throw our feces about? Asked by Eight or BetterIn fact, this somehow happened. Diane Fossy was one of the reasons, why this did not happen. But many of the big apes are almost at the limit of extinction.
Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View PostWhy are there still monkey?
Evolution predicts the stronger species (humans) would crush and exterminate the weaker species(monkeys) it evolved from. Asked by ChristianSoldier
They (the Dodo) were endemic (only existing) on a little island and humans ate them in the 17th century.Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View PostPlease account for quick extinctions.
According to evolution theory it takes millions of years for a species to go extinct. Yet we have examples of species dying out in a few hunderd years like the Dodo. Please account for this.
Why did Aristoteles (and ancient greek) not construct a steam engine? He had all the parts and all the methods to do so. He just did not see any need to do. He had enough cows left to produce energy, pulling something.Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View PostWhy are no human ancestors mentioned in The Bible?
The very fact that Neandertals, Homo-Erectuces are not mentioned in The Bible proves they are made up. I mean you would think God would have mentioned them 6,000 years ago when He wrote The Bible. duh.
People 2000 years ago could have found the remains and could have described them correctly. But they did not see any advantage in doing so. But I'm sure, they had found fossils before and just described them as 'dragons', which is (for their Bronz-Age view) not so far away from dinosaurs - even if it's really an over-simplification.
[/QUOTE]
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Just because you understand what the individual words you type mean does not mean that the manner in which you arranged them makes sense.Originally posted by TheEventHorizon View PostMy good sir, I understand every piece of information I distributed on these stupid forums. So never ever say that again. Also even if I were to post something that not even I would understand then I'd change and fix it.
Not even scientists say apes evolved from monkeys. They bang on about a common ancestor which was a fish that rather conveniently isn't around any more for us to look at.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Obviously this poster is just pulling stuff out of the air. According to their latest drivel the Darwinists are claiming that the first creatures to "leave the oceans" were arthropods which already had legs, followed by some sort of amphibians. The arthropods then ate the amphibians, they say. Sure, 10 years ago they said something different and in another 10 years they'll be announcing something else. Facts don't come into it. Satan pulls their strings and they jerk. Off the top of my head I can't think of a single scientific theory that's stood the test of time.Originally posted by Jack O'fagan View PostCan you please explain this decision process to me?

Leave a comment:
-
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
First of all, this is NOT a debate forum. We're right and you're wrong, according to Jesus and the Holy Word of God. Please read THIS thread before making an even bigger fool of yourself.Originally posted by TheEventHorizon View PostMy good sir, I understand every piece of information I distributed on these stupid forums. So never ever say that again. Also even if I were to post something that not even I would understand then I'd change and fix it.
Secondly, while the internets might seem to be "free" to you, this particular corner of the internets is a privately owned Christian forum. The rights you have on this forum are listed HERE. Please contact a Pastor immediately if you feel that any of your rights have been violated.
Finally, your unsaved opinions or tantrums are not even slightly of interest to us. We follow the Holy Word of God TO THE LETTER, and make no apologies for that. One of the most important commandments in the Bible tells us to avoid unsaved scum such as yourself. You wandered in here uninvited, and unwelcome .
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
My good sir, I understand every piece of information I distributed on these stupid forums. So never ever say that again. Also even if I were to post something that not even I would understand then I'd change and fix it.Originally posted by Jack O'fagan View PostLet's be honest. Even you don't know what you mean by that.
YIC
Jack
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Let's be honest. Even you don't know what you mean by that.Originally posted by TheEventHorizon View PostI never stated that monkeys are apes. I said apes evolved from monkeys practically.
YIC
Jack
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Please be informed on the heresy you are uttering.Originally posted by TheEventHorizon View PostI never stated that monkeys are apes. I said apes evolved from monkeys practically.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
I never stated that monkeys are apes. I said apes evolved from monkeys practically.Originally posted by MitzaLizalor View PostMonkeys are not apes.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Can you please explain this decision process to me?Originally posted by TheEventHorizon View PostAtheism is not a religion. The group of animals that they descended from had decided to stay in the ocean. The animals that decided to go for land eventually evolved legs and such as animals and plants only evolve to adapt to the environment they go to. Also evolution is considered to be a fact, not a theory. There's so much evidence out there in the world. Heck, you can observe bacterium and such evolve under a microscope because they evolve at a much faster rate than humans and millions of other animals and plants do.
YIC
Jack
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Atheism is not a religion. The group of animals that they descended from had decided to stay in the ocean. The animals that decided to go for land eventually evolved legs and such as animals and plants only evolve to adapt to the environment they go to. Also evolution is considered to be a fact, not a theory. There's so much evidence out there in the world. Heck, you can observe bacterium and such evolve under a microscope because they evolve at a much faster rate than humans and millions of other animals and plants do.Originally posted by Jack O'fagan View PostDecided?
I didn't think there was any decisions made in your evolution 'theory'.
Did all the sharks get together and decide not to grow legs? If you have the minutes of the meeting I will join the atheist religion right now.
YIC
Jack
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Decided?Originally posted by TheEventHorizon View PostSince I'm such a lazy bastard I'll answer some of your questions because there's far too much of them.
Mud is when water soil/dirt mix together.
We didn't come from sharks and sharks were from a group of creatures that decided to stay in the ocean. Look up the mudskipper. The fish that all modern life descended from were fish just like the mudskipper as the mudskipper can crawl around on land and it can breathe in air.
.
I didn't think there was any decisions made in your evolution 'theory'.
Did all the sharks get together and decide not to grow legs? If you have the minutes of the meeting I will join the atheist religion right now.
YIC
Jack
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer
Monkeys are not apes.Originally posted by TheEventHorizon View PostAll monkeys didn't turn into humans. Some split into different groups of ape
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: