[Brother Baconeater]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Evilution is complete nonsense. Here is my video debunking it:

[True Disciple]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Evilution is complete nonsense. Here is my video debunking it:

Godly Science, Brother! Did you ever consider a career in Creation Science? Here at Landover University we could use some bright lads, you know!

Meanwhile, I see you have not introduced yourself to us. Please post your introduction thread in the Introduction Forum, and tell us who you are, why you are here, which church you attend, what your favorite Bible verse is, etc.

[Petal]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Evilution is complete nonsense. Here is my video debunking it:

that were so edifyings, Mr.Baconeater an nows i gots a liddle crush on you!

Godly Science, Brother! Did you ever consider a career in Creation Science? Here at Landover University we could use some bright lads, you know!

i thinks them creatin sciences be Mr.Baconeater's true callings even tho i not thinks Mr.Baconeater be as brainys as Mr.Cameron, but that ok cuz Mr.Cameron be a true genus™

swoooon


.

[Brother Baconeater]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Godly Science, Brother! Did you ever consider a career in Creation Science? Here at Landover University we could use some bright lads, you know!

Meanwhile, I see you have not introduced yourself to us. Please post your introduction thread in the Introduction Forum, and tell us who you are, why you are here, which church you attend, what your favorite Bible verse is, etc.

I just introduced myself. I was hoping this could be my church. I'm not good with quoting the bible though, but I did put my favorite quote in my signature.

[SayvedByTheLord]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

That hellbound sinner Dawkins comes out of the woodwork in Australia of all places.

[anonebuam]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Here is some questions for the scientific theocrats of the Darwinist Gestapo to try and answer;

Account for the missing land sharks
If we evolved from fish, why haven’t sharks, who according to your theory predate us, evolved into land animals and are hunting us?

We do have land sharks, or predators on land. Lions, tigers, bears, are all land mammals that evolved to prey on other land going creatures.

Explain floods on Mars with out the Great Flood of the Bible
If Noah’s flood didn’t happen then how do explain the evidence of a great flood on Mars?[/

becuase mars was once a liquid water rich planet. mars lost its atmosphere when the molten iron core of the planet cooled enough to freeze. the molten iron core after all provides the magnetic field for planets like earth and mars and without the magnetic feild, mars atmophere was blown away by solar wind. without an atmosphere, liquid water could not sustain itself, and it froze into the icecaps we see today.

Account for fools
If evolution is survival of the fittest then how do explain the continued survival of unsuccessful groups of stupid humans?

evolution accounts for the genetic shift and presentation of those genes in individuals, so it does not explicitly cover the personality traits per se.

that being said, evolution full well accounts for the larger then any other ape brain we have. this is directly connected to our intelligence.

Explain why human's aren't perfect
If we are evolving why don’t we have third arms now?

becuase the genes for a third arm have not presented themselves as advantageous to reproduction.

Explain infant murder
If we are evolved to nature our young then how do you secular humanist explain your groups pathological desire to kill yours with abortions?

aside from the misspelling of nurture, not nature ...

abortion has been seen in the natural world for thousands of years. it would be absurd to think that as a product of the natural world, we did not share its flaws.

that being said, secular humanists are not pathologically flawed to want to kill there children. there are millions of children who are nurtured by there parents who are secular.


Why no bodies?
If humanity was roughly a million people living at one time. If the human race is 150,000 years old like you maintain that means there have been 150,000,000,000 who lived before the current era. If each corpse takes up 3 by 6 feet then that means the remains of human ancestors cover 1350 billion square feet of the earth! Why are we not buried under the remains of 150 billion people?

becuase of the natural process of decay. bones that are no replaced by minerals via fossilization decay into there baser elements

Were do angels and demons fit into the Evolutionist tree of life?
Please explain the earliest common ancestor with all animals, angles and demons. What is their ancestry and transitional form?

show me the fossil of an angel or a demons and i might have to answer this question.

Explain talking snake in the garden threw evolution.
Please tell me when serpents lost the power of speech and the process with which it happened. Please include any fossil of impaired speech snakes.

show me a snake that could speak and i might have to answer this question.

Explain the Loch Ness Monster threw evolution.
I find it hard to believe that a whole species can sustain itself from so few individuals as observed in Loch Ness. Sounds like a hole in your theory to me

show me evidence of the loch ness monster and i might have to answer this question. there is so far not a single credible witness or shred of evidence to its existence. all evidence of its existence have been disproved or admitted as false.

If evolution is true, then why don't trees stretch up to the stratosphere?
Scientists say that trees grow taller and taller because natural selection forces them to compete for light with other trees. However, they have supposedly had hundreds of millions of years to evolve, but the tallest tree in the world is a mere 370 feet tall.

If evolution were true, we should be living in pitch dark, because the entire troposphere would be encased in a big sheet of tree leaves. Asked by Pastor Billy-Rueben

hardly true at all. the strength of biological elements (like the cell wall of a plant) is only of finite compressive strength. this means there is a limit to what kind of loads it can safely support.

Why don't we act like monkeys
If we are evolved from monkeys why do we behave like them; service our selves constantly an throw our feces about? Asked by Eight or Better

becuase we share the same building blocks, a specation event like in our past merely means that we do not reproduce with monkeys, it says nothing about what traits we inharreted from them.

Why are there still monkey?
Evolution predicts the stronger species (humans) would crush and exterminate the weaker species(monkeys) it evolved from. Asked by ChristianSoldier

we evolved from monkeys becuase the places we lived changed. our population grew in areas better suited for upright transportation and community living. monkeys still exist becuase the habitat that evolved monkeys still exists.

that being said, there were hundreds of species of hominids that do not exist today. most are evolutionary dead ends, they could not compete with homo-sapian in reproduction, thus, we dominated.

Please account for quick extinctions.
According to evolution theory it takes millions of years for a species to go extinct. Yet we have examples of species dying out in a few hunderd years like the Dodo. Please account for this.

well evolution doesn't state that at all.

if a species environment changes faster then it can adapt, it will die off. the introduction of dodo hunting changed the predatory environment it lived it, and it could not adapt defense mechanisms, and thus was hunted to death.

Were are ancestors and fossilizes remains of the dragon, satyr and unicorn?
I would say the lack of fossils for these three creatures presents a clear gap in the record.

if you can show me what those three evolved into, then i might have to answer this question.

Why are no human ancestors mentioned in The Bible?
The very fact that Neandertals, Homo-Erectuces are not mentioned in The Bible proves they are made up. I mean you would think God would have mentioned them 6,000 years ago when He wrote The Bible. duh.

well god didn't write the bible, men did.

Explain wasps with evolution.
Wasp paralyze spiders and then implant their young in them to feed on living, but helpless insect. If evolution was true them spiders would have anti-wasp poison in their blood. But they don’t. The only way you can get such a horrific death as those countless spiders suffer is threw the power of God.

the emergence or non-emergence of defense mechanisms is at the will of the changes in the genome. if the genome could not change to produce such a poison, it would not emerge.

How could Cain could procreate with his sisters if evolution was true?
If can was getting busy with his sister like The Bible relates then the human race should be a race of inbreed deformities like the English Royal Family. Instead we see the general population is healthy. This can only happen if Cain and his sister were of the pure first generation after Adam not corrupted by sins yet.

this is actually a harder question for you to answer. since evolution has no Adam, eve, cain or able, we do not have to speculate on the mating habbits of them.

i'd forward you the same question - we know inbreeding is real, you yourself have the evidence that you brought to this question. if you agree that inbreeding does exist, then why was cain able to reproduce effectively?

The Genealogy of Henry III
The "Evidence From Genealogy" display, donated by Edgar Nurnberg, is one of the more favorite displays of our visitors. These scrolls from the Lambeth Palace in England trace the genealogy of King Henry the 6th back to Adam and Eve.
Asked by Heathen Basher 8/18/09

do you trust everything you read in a book? clearly if those damn evolutionists can write books, cannot monarchs looking to justify there power also write books?

Unicorn Horns
What so-called "evoloutionary role" does the horn on a unicorn play? I was taught evolutionary theory, and I can't figure it out! Asked by H. Montague Worthington's 8/24/09

if you showed me a unicorn horn in the fossil record this might be a problem. its not there becuase it doesn't provide an evolutionary role.

Transitional fossils for single celled organism.
The Darwinists would have us believe that life evolved from single-celled organisms to more complicated forms. If that's true, then we should expect to see intermediaries between organisms with one cell and organisms with millions/billions/trillions of cells, but that's exactly what we don't see. Where are all the two-celled organisms that we should see if evolution was true? Where are all the five-celled organisms or twelve-celled organisms? Are we supposed to believe that 50 million amoebas randomly assembled into a fully formed flatworm by chance? Asked by Pastor Billy-Reuben. 8/25/09

we do see multi-cell fossils.

Why is there still mud?
Darwinists claim that life originate in mud. If you really believe that a big pile of mud turned into a fish, which sprouted legs and arms and turned into monkeys, which turned into human beings, then you're more stupid than I thought. For a start, if that's true, why's there still mud around, and why do babies not have tails like monkeys when they're born? Asked by Rachel Pierce 11/4/09

Darwin was a 1800's biologist. fortunately science moves forward. we now have new ideas, and much better evidence for how life was formed.

babies do have tails, and in fact, you and i both have tails.

Why don't chemicals think?
If our brains are just a mishmash of biochemistry, how come chemicals like gasoline or bug spray can't think? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10

becuase chemicals are not protein machines, they are chemicals. the interaction of complex protein machines and the chemicals they respond to is far more then a single chemical in a beaker.

but, after all, how do you know a chemical can't think? are you a chemical?

Why don't we have natural clothing?
People have been wearing clothes for thousands of years. Why haven't our bodies evolved natural clothes that come out of our skin then? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10

we actually lost our natural clothing. africa is hot, and when we started separating from the other great apes, it was mostly becuase we moved into the sub-Sahara. its hot there, and the natural coating of fur we has as apes became a nucence. those ancestors with less hair were more comfortable and could reproduce more easily, and thus dominated the population.

Well evolutionist, please give it your best shot. Even one question will be helpful. I look forward to your answers.

bolded.

nothing really confusing in there. if you want more detailed explanations, ask.

[GOD=life]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

I have a question: why did evilutionists change their stance that humans evolved from an ape to the stance that humans evolved from the ancestors of apes? (i.e. common ancestor). Logically, it is to be expected that the ancestors of apes are even less sophisticated than apes.

So exactly how does that make evilution more palatable to Christians?

[anonebuam]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

I have a question: why did evilutionists change their stance that humans evolved from an ape to the stance that humans evolved from the ancestors of apes? (i.e. common ancestor). Logically, it is to be expected that the ancestors of apes are even less sophisticated than apes.

So exactly how does that make evilution more palatable to Christians?

yours and others (even if they believe in evolution) mis-understanding of the theory is not my problem to explain.

it is more-correct to say even then what you said that humans ARE apes, and never stopped being apes. this is becuase the great apes are a collection of species, much like all ducks are birds, but not all birds are ducks. there are species of ape that are unlike us, but we are all apes. we all share common traits that define us as apes, such as a tail, pubic hair, the size and shape of the skull ... and such. we never stopped being apes, just as ducks never stopped being birds, becuase they share the same traits, wings, hollow bones, egg laying ...

arguing from your own ignorance of the topic is not much of an argument.

[John Scopes]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

yours and others (even if they believe in evolution) mis-understanding of the theory is not my problem to explain.

it is more-correct to say even then what you said that humans ARE apes, and never stopped being apes. this is becuase the great apes are a collection of species, much like all ducks are birds, but not all birds are ducks. there are species of ape that are unlike us, but we are all apes. we all share common traits that define us as apes, such as a tail, pubic hair, the size and shape of the skull ... and such. we never stopped being apes, just as ducks never stopped being birds, becuase they share the same traits, wings, hollow bones, egg laying ...

arguing from your own ignorance of the topic is not much of an argument.

Your efforts are admirable but you you must understand that most here cannot relate to what you say. It is a result of the protracted inbreeding that occurs in certain Christian sects.

I am here to research the genetic effects of this behavior.

[GOD=life]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

it is more-correct to say even then what you said that humans ARE apes, and never stopped being apes.

Christians aren't apes. God designed Christians as a man and a woman, i.e. Adam and Eve. Not Screetch and Scratch.

arguing from your own ignorance of the topic is not much of an argument.

Using an ad hominem fallacy by insulting one's intelligence does not demonstrate the kind of intellect that would be appropriate to thoroughly rebuke but a mere modest Christian.

[anonebuam]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Christians aren't apes. God designed Christians as a man and a woman, i.e. Adam and Eve. Not Screetch and Scratch.


Using an ad hominem fallacy by insulting one's intelligence does not demonstrate the kind of intellect that would be appropriate to thoroughly rebuke but a mere modest Christian.

i was only pointing out that your own lack of knowledge as to what evolutionary theory actually is, is the root of your concern. if you knew about the theory, then your question would be answered. i said nothing of your intelligence.

Christians are certainly apes. even if you consider Christians there own species, then they still would be apes, as they still have all the same characteristics of the great apes, and were born from a great ape.

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Christians are certainly apes.

Did you actually go to a Zoo and look at apes? Ever? Are you aware they cannot talk, cannot read and throw around feces?

[GOD=life]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

i was only pointing out that your own lack of knowledge as to what evolutionary theory actually is

Okay, so when I ask >> 1 << simple question to clarify my understanding, you greet me with a patronizing tone and insult my knowledge and intelligence.

All it signals to me is that you are UNWILLING to answer even simple questions and instead just go into attack mode. Oh no, a Christian asked a question about your precious HYPOTHESIS! I'm not even going to bother calling it a theory, sorry.

i said nothing of your intelligence.

It was strongly implied by your condescending and patronizing tone.

Christians are certainly apes.

Until you show me an ape that can read the Bible and pray to God, then the answer remains: "no, we're not".

I'm sure these are trivial to you, but Christians have the following characteristics that your super apes do not:

• Ability to learn skills and acquire knowledge that increase from generation to generation. Apes do not have this ability and are stick with the same basic set of skills.
• Ability to reason, apply logic and think in abstract terms. Apes can only think in terms of "I screetch, I get banana! Yum!"
• Ability to conceive of and pray to God and thus go to Heaven. Apes do not go to Heaven.
• Ability to talk and communicate intelligently with others. Apes can do no such thing. They can only express dominance and very basic desires.
• Free will. Apes do not have free will.

Just some things for you to think about...

[nogodsnomanagers]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

wow the christian cult really uses that as a justification that evolution is not real? Im speechless that such ignorance exists in the united states. That's why I love asia where christians are the minorities for once.

[GOD=life]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

wow the christian cult really uses that as a justification that evolution is not real? Im speechless that such ignorance exists in the united states. That's why I love asia where christians are the minorities for once.

Christians were the persecuted minorities in Communist Russia and in Nazi Germany too.

In the meantime: Christians are in the majority in the most powerful, most free and richest nation in the entire history of mankind.

Please feel free not to come to our Christian country

Oh and in case you're not asian yourself: you might have noticed that when it comes to racism, asians are among the most racist on earth. But hey, at least they turned away from God, so we'll forgive them for thinking white people are worse than trash.