Questions that evolutionist canâ€™t answer

**Nobar King** · 01-14-2011, 06:40 AM

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Originally posted by KirovH View Post

I honestly thought this was some kind of joke forum, but now I realize you people are just crazy. Wow.

If you mean crazy for Jesus! THen I won't disagree with you!

**KirovH** · 01-14-2011, 08:55 AM

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Originally posted by Nobar King View Post

If you mean crazy for Jesus! THen I won't disagree with you!

There really isn't a difference.

**MitzaLizalor** · 01-14-2011, 09:05 AM

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Originally posted by KirovH View Post

There really isn't a difference.

Jesus is God

Schizophrenia, delusional psychosis, epilepsy & bipolar "disorders" (to name but 4) are demonic possession = Satan

can you spot the difference yet?

**God's Flaming Sword** · 01-14-2011, 04:46 PM

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Originally posted by KirovH View Post

I hate to be the one to point this out, but you in fact did reproduce my whole post again, albeit without responding.

Take a look at the post again sinner - I only quoted the first paragraph and no more of your turgid ramblings and vile spewings.

Originally posted by KirovH View Post

Also I would like to point out that Jimbo has never stated his dissatisfaction with the nickname and I for one respect him enough to think he is entitled to speak for himself.

The good Reverend is more than capable of speaking for himself of course but I am sure that he is busy saving souls and preaching the word of the Lord than to take time immediately out of his hectic schedule to rebuff unsaved trash like yourself.

Originally posted by KirovH View Post

As your forum had by default labeled me as 'unsaved trash', I think that might also be an assumption on your part. On the contrary, I am not in need of saving as I am in no immediate danger. I didn't bother siting a biblical source as the citation of the bible had nothing to do with answering questions in regards to the truth of evolution. I'd also like to add that I've read the bible through several times in my life, and simply copy/pasting the first chapter of Genesis doesn't really mean anything to me.

If you had bothered to read the TOC's and the polite requests to introduce yourself properly you would be aware that everyone new to the forums has this epithet. If you prove yourself worthy it doesn't take to long before the glory of God's love will shine upon you and your status will change.

As for Genesis meaning nothing to you - I pity you sinner....prepare yourself to be Satan's playtoy as you burn in his fiery sulphur pits for all eternity.

Originally posted by KirovH View Post

As a closing remark, I find it highly amusing that I received a warning for answering questions about evolution in a thread asking for someone to answer questions about evolution. Ha ha.

We are not here to amuse you heathen - this is a discussion forum for true Christian men and women.....not a debating site for unsaved trash to spout their pagan propaganda.

If you want to be taken seriously then please read the KJV bible and then if you can find anything contained within that supports what you say then quote that - not that you will of course as the Good Book is perfect in its teachings to us in these points.

**Bobby-Joe** · 01-14-2011, 05:03 PM

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Originally posted by KirovH View Post

There really isn't a difference.

You're the one who thinks humans came from mud. How utterly ludicrous. Do corpses turn to mud when we die? No! As the Bible teaches us we came from dust!

**KirovH** · 01-14-2011, 05:23 PM

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

After reading more into your institution, I have had a change of heart. I approve brothers and sisters, continue carrying out the Lord's work!

**Pastor Billy-Reuben** · 01-16-2011, 03:35 AM

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Thanks for attempting to answer my questions, friend.

Originally posted by KirovH View Post

If evolution is true, then why don't trees stretch up to the stratosphere?
Scientists say that trees grow taller and taller because natural selection forces them to compete for light with other trees. However, they have supposedly had hundreds of millions of years to evolve, but the tallest tree in the world is a mere 370 feet tall.

If evolution were true, we should be living in pitch dark, because the entire troposphere would be encased in a big sheet of tree leaves. Asked by Pastor Billy-Rueben

Thank you for asking this obviously ignorant question, Billy. Firstly, I'd like to acknowledge your casual disregard for a living being 370 feet tall. Secondly, I'd like to say that it amazes me that while members of this church ridicule the idea of gravity, round earth, and time zones, the various layers of the atmosphere have apparently found accreditation. As the answer to this question lies mostly with the strength of the Earth's gravitational pull and the weakness of our satellite's (the moon), you'll most likely ignore anything further so I'll just save myself the time.

You insult my intelligence, then say you won't waste your time on me. If you were really concerned about your time, you wouldn't have responded at all.

I suppose responding that way makes you feel better about yourself than if you had just admitted that you don't know the answer.

Originally posted by KirovH View Post

Transitional fossils for single celled organism.
The Darwinists would have us believe that life evolved from single-celled organisms to more complicated forms. If that's true, then we should expect to see intermediaries between organisms with one cell and organisms with millions/billions/trillions of cells, but that's exactly what we don't see. Where are all the two-celled organisms that we should see if evolution was true? Where are all the five-celled organisms or twelve-celled organisms? Are we supposed to believe that 50 million amoebas randomly assembled into a fully formed flatworm by chance? Asked by Pastor Billy-Reuben. 8/25/09

Well Billy, I'm sure that even you would have to admit that the fossilization of a two-celled organism would be exceptionally hard to find. Ultimately, the fossilization process itself is one of exceptionally rare occurrence; we are quite fortunate to even have fossils at all or we might still be thinking the earth was made a few thousand years ago. (Ha ha!) The truth is that from time to time, there are evolutionary intermediaries discovered in fossils. The problem of course is that people like you are impossible to reason with. You are convinced that you are right, based entirely on faith and when given evidence to the contrary you either ignore it, or dismiss it without inquiry. But I digress, if ever we happen to find a microscopic fossil of a two celled organism, I'm sure you will be the first person contacted for factual analysis.

Thanks, but I wasn't looking for fossils. I'm looking for surviving descendants of two, five, or twelve celled organisms. I was wondering why all modern life either has one cell or has millions/billions/trillions of cells, and there's nothing in the middle with dozens, hundreds, or thousands of cells. There doesn't seem to be any evidence at all of any link between unicellular and massively multicellular life.

Pastor Billy-Reuben

**MitzaLizalor** · 01-16-2011, 08:52 AM

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Originally posted by KirovH View Post

Mutations are random changes, most often negative ones, but rarely one that provides a new strength to the affected species.

_____________________

the fossilization process itself is one of exceptionally rare occurrence; we are quite fortunate to even have fossils at all or we might still be thinking the earth was made a few thousand years ago..

Well after reading all this rubbish, I was challenged (how to refute such gibberish) Matthew 7:6

The two points asserted (above) (without references) are sufficient however:

1. Mutations are random changes, ~~most often~~ ALWAYS negative ones, ~~but rarely~~ NEVER one that provides a new strength to the affected species.

2. of exceptionally rare occurrence -- -- so how come my garden centre has thousands of the things for sale priced from a few dollars, upwards?

REFERENCES

http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/Encyclopedia/10mut10.htm

"In the first experiment, the fly was selected for a decrease in bristles and, in the second experiment, for an increase in bristles. Starting with a parent stock averaging 36 bristles, it is possible after thirty generations to lower the average to 25 bristles, "but then the line became sterile and died out." In the second experiment, the average number of bristles were increased from 36 to 56; then sterility set in. Mayr concluded with the following observation: Obviously any drastic improvement under selection must seriously deplete the store of genetic variability . . The most frequent correlated response of one-sided selection is a drop in general fitness. This plagues virtually every breeding experiment."

http://www.collectorscorner.com.au/Fossmain.htm

F5381 Sallocoma sp. Free swimming Sea Lilly/Crinoid Solnhofen, Eichstatt, Germany $25

F5391 Viviparous reesidel Carnelian replaced molluscs: Brushy Basin Member, Mesa Co, Colorado, U.S.A. $40

GENESIS 7
19 And the waters preuailed exceedingly vpon the earth, and all the high hils, that were vnder the whole heauen, were couered.
20 Fifteene cubits vpward, did the waters preuaile; and the mountaines were couered.
21 And all flesh died, that mooued vpon the earth, both of fowle, & of cattell, and of beast, and of euery creeping thing that creepeth vpon the earth, and euery man.
22 All in whose nosethrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died.
23 And euery liuing substance was destroyed, which was vpon the face of the ground, both man and cattell, and the creeping things, and the foule of the heauen; and they were destroyed from the earth: and Noah onely remained aliue, and they that were with him in the Arke.
24 And the waters preuailed vpon the earth, an hundred and fifty dayes.

**TooShyToChat** · 01-19-2011, 08:23 AM

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Hi, I'm new here. I don't actually know anything about religions(yet), but I'm really interested to learn what you think. In advance, I'm sorry about my poor English skills - it is not my primary language.

I have been reading this thread for a while now, but I don't have enaugh time to go through every post at this time.

I'm eager to learn what you think, because your ideas are really something that I have ever seen before and honestly I thought at first that this forum was formed as a joke, but clearly that is not the case.

Couple of questions that came to mind while reading(I hope you are not offended, because that is not my purpose at all):

1. How did you come to learn that God is the author of the Bible?

2. Do you think that the Bible is affected by men in history wanting to achieve their own goals?

3. If so, what is the worst version made from the Bible?

4. Do you think that English translated version of Bible differs from the original one? Are you sure that the translators didn't add anything in it?

5. Some post in the Genocide thread informed that Americans are Gods favourite people? Why do you think so? I thought Israel could have been the favourite.

6. I'm sure I have sinned in my life this far(sex, drugs and rock'n'roll). Am I certain to go to Hell or is there a chance that I could be saved if I would repent and act decently from now on?

7. I noticed that some writers has descriptions informing than they are certain to be damned. Is it ok for us to judge, or should we leave that to God?

8. What happened to the good and kind people after dead who lived time before Christ? I know that Heaven didn't accept mortals, but was Hell already open?

9. Do you think God might have created other worlds as well?

10. Is Satan suffering as well or is he happy with his role as the ruler of the Hell?

11. Is Satan the second most powerful being in the universe after God or could some other angels be more powerful?

12. Is killing a sinner a sin?

13. Do you know know what God did before creating the world? He must have had millions of years to do something else?

14. How many people do you think will go to Heaven from the current 6000 000 000 people in the world?

15. Is it possible to go around the world by boat?

16. If we would dig a hole, how deep would it be before reaching the spot where we would fall down and would we find the Hell on the way while digging?

Thank you for your patience with me!

**MitzaLizalor** · 01-19-2011, 09:40 AM

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Originally posted by Steven E View Post

For one i believe tha exmormon, (one of your forum members) did an experiment where he wanted a car to evolve in his garage. which is rediculous on SO MANY levels, but the biggest issue with the experiment was cars don't evolve, (there not alive)

Bobby-Joe has a question "Explain why human's aren't perfect" but if you understood evolution, you would know that inperfect humans would actually support evolution, if we were perfect life forms, that would be a problem for evolution.

Anyone with a decent understanding of evolution would know why your arguments against it are so foolish.

THE EVOLUTION OF THE AUTOMOBILE

**MitzaLizalor** · 01-19-2011, 10:02 AM

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Originally posted by MitzaLizalor View Post

SOURCE HERE (link doesn't seem to work)

"http://rulehibernia.com/2010/09/richard-dawkins-doesn’t-get-it/" <-copy to address bar WITHOUT QUOTATION MARKS " .. " works then..

**Lost Sheep McUinnean** · 01-19-2011, 10:17 AM

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer