[nikilds]

Re: Hello, I noticed that many of you don't understand evolution.

1. One of the things angry people around here say, is that evolution happened in one or two generations (a.i., a monkey gave birth to a human.), wich is not what the evolution theory says. It says that slowly, over thousands of generations the monkey-race turned into humans.

2. This proces goes on until the two groups cannot mate with each other anymore, even if they were put back together anymore -> they are now two seperate species of animals.

1. If the earth is only 6000 years old, then how did thousands and thousands of generations of monkey races even exist?!

2. If Americans cant mate with Europeans because of the distance, then why do they look like us?

Not only is evilution contrary to the Bible, IT DOESNT MAKE SENSE!

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Hello, I noticed that many of you don't understand evolution.

This is what I am seeing not just in this thread but everywhere I go.You have not stopped to consider the opposing decide simply because it goes against your own belief. Don't forget that athiests think they are right just as much as you think you are right and if you jump to conclusions like this, they will laugh at you. I'm not saying evolution is right or even supporting, I am merely trying to encourage logical thinking and intellectual debate.

Friend,

On one side you have Creationism, which comes for God Himself as reviled threw The Bible. On the other side you have Evolution which comes from human beings (who almost certainly hate God). What’s there to consider here? God has perfect knowledge, the scientist don’t. Arguing that the evidence doesn’t support Creationism is like people claiming there are contradictions in The Bible. God is perfect, God wrote The Bible so The Bible is perfect. The reader is human and therefore imperfect. Therefore any contradictions or mistakes are the reader’s fault since he is the only imperfect thing there.

[Sacha-DG]

Re: Hello, I noticed that many of you don't understand evolution.

Perhaps everyone who is so quick to say "Evilution is wrong, those who follow it will automatically burn in hell" should consider both sides from a neutral standpoint. I am a Christian myself but I cannot stand to see fellow worshippers instantly turn down anything that does not explicity appear in the Bible. The Bible neither supports nor rejects evolution as of course the theory did not exist at the time of the original transcription.

Those who ask for examples of evolution within short periods of time, even over thousands of years are simply ignoring what the theory states.

Let's examine the conversation between from what I'm seeing on here, most of you and an atheist.

Person A believes in evolution.
Person B believes that the Lord made everything the way it is and made man in his own image.

A: Scientific research shows that over a very long period of time, humans and apes evolved from a common ancestor.
B: Prove it.
A: It can be seen through the distinct similarities between the two species, hair on their bodies, save for on the palms of their hands and soles of their feet, capable of walking upright, same physical method of reproduction, same internal organ structure etc.
B: But can you show me clearly and distinctly how they evolved from this 'common ancestor'?
A: No, its a process that takes millions of years.
B: Well you cannot prove it so it is just a theory therefore you are wrong and you will be cursed to eternal damnation.

This is what I am seeing not just in this thread but everywhere I go.
You have not stopped to consider the opposing decide simply because it goes against your own belief. Don't forget that athiests think they are right just as much as you think you are right and if you jump to conclusions like this, they will laugh at you. I'm not saying evolution is right or even supporting, I am merely trying to encourage logical thinking and intellectual debate.

[Deaner]

Re: Hello, I noticed that many of you don't understand evolution.

Though you now expect me to make everything clear to you, I can't. I'm no evolution-scientist. Just a guy that's pretty annoyed by people calling evolution 'evilution'.

So in other words you know nothing. You come in here shooting your mouth off at us True Christians when you really have zero to back yourself up with.

We have a book dictated by God. We have two thousand years of documented, irrefutable proof of the power of Christ and his wonderous miracles. You eviloutionists are a joke. Once you can explain to me how Christ walked on water or raised people from the dead I might take you a little more serious.

[Wide-Open]

Re: Hello, I noticed that many of you don't understand evolution.

You too, are wrong. Evilution says that man and apes share a common ancestor, not that monkeys evolved into people. If you are going to blaspheme God, know your own religion.

Pssst. Andrew... see above.

[Andrew Barrick]

Re: Hello, I noticed that many of you don't understand evolution.

It says that slowly, over thousands of generations the monkey-race turned into humans.

You too, are wrong. Evilution says that man and apes share a common ancestor, not that monkeys evolved into people. If you are going to blaspheme God, know your own religion.

[Cobaltos]

Re: Hello, I noticed that many of you don't understand evolution.

The thing about disproving evoluition has Bible in the URL :/ It can't be 100% unbiased. And well, scientists (there's an E in there.) don't know everything (yet). It's not easy having to explain everything.

Though you now expect me to make everything clear to you, I can't. I'm no evolution-scientist. Just a guy that's pretty annoyed by people calling evolution 'evilution'. If you want more info on evolution just find some neutral source about it.

[eliot mayfield]

Re: Hello, I noticed that many of you don't understand evolution.

You should take a look here

http://www.biblelife.org/evolution.htm

some highlights:

The Theory of Evolution is not a scientific law or a law of biology. A scientific law must be 100% correct. Failure to meet only one challenge proves the law is wrong. This web page will prove that the Theory of Evolution fails many challenges, not simply one. The Theory of Evolution will never become a law of science because it is wrought with errors. This is why it is called a theory, instead of a law.
The same process is done with flowers, fruits and vegetables. New variations of the species are possible, but a new species has never been developed by science. In fact, the most modern laboratories are unable to produce a left-hand protein as found in humans and animals.
If natural selection were true, Eskimos would have fur to keep warm, but they don't. They are just as hairless and everyone else. If natural selection were true, humans in the tropics would have silver, reflective skin to help them keep cool, but they don't. They have black skin, just the opposite of what the theory of natural selection would predict. If natural selection were true, humans at northern latitudes would have black skin, but they have white skin instead, except for the Eskimos with skin that is half way between white and black. Many evolutionist argue that melanin is a natural sunscreen that evolved in a greater amount to protect dark skinned people who live near the Equator. They simply ignore the fact that dark skinned Eskimos live north of the Arctic Circle. Melanin in the skin is not a sound argument in favor of evolution. The theory of natural selection is wrong because it cannot create something in the DNA that wasn't there in the beginning.

[Wide-Open]

Re: Hello, I noticed that many of you don't understand evolution.

Where is the link between man and ape? Has one ever been found?

The link went somewhat AWOL, Brother Mayfield. Perhaps that's why they refer to it as "missing".

[Wide-Open]

Re: Hello, I noticed that many of you don't understand evolution.

And to the other guy, it was just a small post, I can't go in-depth on everything of evolution.

Being "the other guy": I believe you when you say you can not go in-depth.

At least learn what those damned atheists are actually saying before confronting us with dog fornicating "Scintists".

[Cobaltos]

Re: Hello, I noticed that many of you don't understand evolution.

Where is the link between man and ape? Has one ever been found?

Geneticly, man and apes are a lot alike. There's a link.

[Cobaltos]

Re: Hello, I noticed that many of you don't understand evolution.

Well it might make sense if he was a communist or a capitialist; but not somebody that wants to have sex with his dog. He was obviously unstable and a sinner. He's burning in hell right now.

Then again, how do you know he wanted to have sex with his dog?

And to the other guy, it was just a small post, I can't go in-depth on everything of evolution. But most biology books cover it pretty nicely. Also, wikipedia gives a good idea of what it is, it isn't perfect because people make wrong edits all the time. But still.

[eliot mayfield]

Re: Hello, I noticed that many of you don't understand evolution.

No, I haven't witnessed evolution in action, it happens too slow for one man in a single generation to see. However, it's common biology to know that when one does something for a time, he gets pysicly better at it. It seems logical for the same to be true in an entire species of creatures.

And I guess I have no Biblical reverences to evolution, but then again, the Bible was written in a time before the evolution theory even existed.

Where is the link between man and ape? Has one ever been found?

[Deaner]

Re: Hello, I noticed that many of you don't understand evolution.

Where did you get that? Even if he was, it has nothing to do with his theory. The theory makes sence wether the man was a communist or a capitalist or whatever.

Well it might make sense if he was a communist or a capitialist; but not somebody that wants to have sex with his dog. He was obviously unstable and a sinner. He's burning in hell right now.

[Wide-Open]

Re: Hello, I noticed that many of you don't understand evolution.

It says that slowly, over thousands of generations the monkey-race turned into humans.

That's not what monkey worshipper Darwin said at all. First of all, he talks about species, not races. Second, he said that apes and humans must have a common ancestor, which is quite a different thing altogether.

Over time the digging group gets better at digging and grows better claws.

That again is not how they claim it works. Evolution in this case would favor those rodents who through genetical variation would grow "better" claws (a better "fit" to their ecological niche), with more chance of survival.

No, I haven't witnessed evolution in action

Again, than you haven't been paying attention to those silly evilutionists. They would give you examples like the Biston Bistularia or something lame like that.

Anyway, it's a moot point. There is no evolution in the KJV.