X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Redeemed Papist
    replied
    Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

    Originally posted by logo73 View Post
    A theory from the Bronze-Age. Still a theory.
    Don't be ridiculous. You can call the word of God anything you like but it's still the word of God.

    Leave a comment:


  • loco73
    replied
    Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

    Originally posted by Redeemed Papist View Post
    Matthew 10:28 And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.


    A theory from the Bronze-Age. Still a theory.

    Leave a comment:


  • Redeemed Papist
    replied
    Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

    Originally posted by logo73 View Post
    Just like your theory with the soul.
    Theory?

    I think not, my friend.
    Matthew 10:28 And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.

    Leave a comment:


  • loco73
    replied
    Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

    Originally posted by Redeemed Papist View Post
    Phlogiston is just an obvious thing made up by people to fill a gap in their knowledge by invoking something unseen and undetectable and then trying to appear clever thereby.

    Just like your theory with the soul.

    Leave a comment:


  • Redeemed Papist
    replied
    Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

    Originally posted by logo73 View Post
    And I thought, you objected to sciences.. So continue to believe in phlogiston.
    What makes you think any True Christian(TM) believes in something just made up by "scientists" to explain things they don't understand? Phlogiston is just an obvious thing made up by people to fill a gap in their knowledge by invoking something unseen and undetectable and then trying to appear clever thereby.

    Leave a comment:


  • loco73
    replied
    Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

    Originally posted by Redeemed Papist View Post
    The theory fell when Lavoisier noticed that solid oxides gained mass and proposed the existence of oxygen, you chump. Know the thing which you champion.

    And I thought, you objected to sciences.. So continue to believe in phlogiston.

    Leave a comment:


  • Redeemed Papist
    replied
    Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

    Originally posted by logo73 View Post
    Yes, that theory was the same for the 'phlogiston', when people thought, fire was a so called substrance 'phlogiston'. The non-phlogiston-believers just said: "If it exists, isolate it". But the phlogiston believers were not able to. So, the theory fell. The same with the soul.
    Isolate it to proof it.....
    The theory fell when Lavoisier noticed that solid oxides gained mass and proposed the chemistry of oxygen was the cause of combustion following Priestley's work, you chump. Know the thing which you champion.

    Leave a comment:


  • loco73
    replied
    Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

    Originally posted by Rev. M. Rodimer View Post
    How can you isolate something that cannot be measured as it is not material?

    And I thought, a soul is the person itself, the mind and everything. So, it must be possible to isolate. Or maybe.....it just doesn't exist. Sure then you can not isolate it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rev. M. Rodimer
    replied
    Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

    Originally posted by logo73 View Post
    Yes, that theory was the same for the 'phlogiston', when people thought, fire was a so called substrance 'phlogiston'. The non-phlogiston-believers just said: "If it exists, isolate it". But the phlogiston believers were not able to. So, the theory fell. The same with the soul.
    Isolate it to proof it.....
    How can you isolate something that cannot be measured as it is not material?

    Leave a comment:


  • loco73
    replied
    Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

    Originally posted by Redeemed Papist View Post
    The main issue is your total lack of regard for your immortal soul!

    Yes, that theory was the same for the 'phlogiston', when people thought, fire was a so called substrance 'phlogiston'. The non-phlogiston-believers just said: "If it exists, isolate it". But the phlogiston believers were not able to. So, the theory fell. The same with the soul.
    Isolate it to proof it.....

    Leave a comment:


  • Redeemed Papist
    replied
    Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

    Originally posted by logo73 View Post
    One of the main issues is the pelvic bone. There are dinosaurs with bird-like pelvic bones - avian pelvic bone dinosaur. That shows the heritage of birds and dinos. And there is a species of birds, whose offspring still got claws on their wings.
    The main issue is your total lack of regard for your immortal soul!

    Leave a comment:


  • loco73
    replied
    Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

    Originally posted by Faith_Machine View Post
    Did T-Rex have a beak?

    No.

    Do chickens have beaks?

    Yes.

    Did T-Rex have teeth?

    Yes.

    Do chickens have teeth?

    No.


    CASE CLOSED!

    One of the main issues is the pelvic bone. There are dinosaurs with bird-like pelvic bones - avian pelvic bone dinosaur. That shows the heritage of birds and dinos. And there is a species of birds, whose offspring still got claws on their wings.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alphonse Alban
    replied
    Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

    Originally posted by krdulaney36 View Post
    Jesus Christ....lol
    Why do you feel the need to laugh at Jesus? Salvation is no joking matter.

    Leave a comment:


  • krdulaney36
    replied
    Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

    You ppl are OUT OF YOUR MINDS!!! lol, A giant happy Kangaroo that cave ppl kept as pets?? Jesus Christ....lol

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Ezekiel
    replied
    Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

    Originally posted by ManyFace View Post


    The Iguana skeleton which clearly depicts similarities to our own skeletons.
    I don't know about you, but I don't have a long tail. That thing looks more like a rat than a human being.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X