Ever since their cult was invented, Mormons have not passed any opportunity to add to their illogical burden of ridiculous claims. This is no surprise, as the cult was founded upon total disregard for the Commandments of Jesus.
Deuteronomy 4:2
Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.
Yet the Mormons added. The result was the Book of Mormon (1), probably the most outrageous collection of psychedelic fantasies ever since the Qur'an. The Mormons still claim that they also revere the Bible but that is impossible as they decided that the Word of Jesus had to be supplemented with the drug-induced hallucinations of Mr. Smith. It remains an enigma why the Mormons would believe a collections of inconsistent and self-contradictory texts while a perfectly coherent and structured publication, the King James Version, would also be available.
It is hard to imagine that the Mormons could come up with anything even more ridiculous but now they have. The well-known sub-human creature, the Bigfoot, is supposedly none other than Cain (Genesis 4:1) himself, the son of Adam, the first murderer (Genesis 4:8).
Now let us examine this moronic claim. First we shall look at the Biblical evidence:
Genesis 4:15
And the LORD said unto him, Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. And the LORD set a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him.
Now, the Mormons claim that the mark looks like this!

Does this really look like a "mark" that would tell a spectator that this Creature should be slain? Obviously, it is ugly and repulsive but so is my wife also, and I've yet to meet a passer-by who would take her as Cain. The claim is ridiculous. This is what the Cain and Abel incident actually looked like!

I can see no hirsutism. A Caucasian and quite a good-looking fellow slaying his brother in rage.
My conclusion: Biblically, the Mormon claim fails miserably, as expected.
Now let us see, if this Mormon hypothesis is feasible regarding other available data on Bigfeet. It is not. We can presume that the Bigfoot is a real Creature, as it has been sighted thousands of times all across the Earth's Disk although mostly in North America. This a map of the known confirmed Bigfoot observations:

Now, if Cain had become an immortal sub-human roaming the Earth until the End of Times, this would be certainly possible. During the 6000 years of his existence, he would well have covered all the marked regions. BUT there is more. We have also data on the schedule of Bigfoot movements. It shows us that the latest sighting of the Bigfoot in Palin's Alaska was in January 2014. However, there was a simultaneous Bigfoot report in South Carolina. If Bigfoot was Cain, he would have had to be in two locations at the same moment. This is impossible. The Mormon theory collapses.
If not Cain, then WHO is the Bigfoot?
We have the answer (2). A previous True Christian™ report has actually investigated this issue. As always, we win and the moronic Mormon ideas lose.
Both these True Christian™ hypotheses fit extremely well the theory of Genetic Entropy. The Bigfoot is sub-human but not Cain. It is a result of microevolution (which, unlike macroevolution is possible). It belongs to the human Created Kind but it has degenerated. Its closest relatives are probably the Catholics and Muslims who also descend from Ishmael. It is also feasible that this Mormon theory is an attempt to hide the Truth™ that Mormons themselves are descendants of Ishmael or Esau and hence very hairy. The Mormon underwear also gets an explanation. It is designed to cover the excess body hair of sub-humans.

Instead of proving anything, the Mormon claim gives us precious new insight into the corrupt nature of this false religion.
Yours in Christ,
Elmer
FOOTNOTES
1) The Book or Mormon or "The Outrageous Forgery of Alleged Gold Plates that Were translated into Anachronistic English and Never Seen before or After".
2) Des (a True Christian™ man) 2014: Bigfoot: Descendant of Ishmael or Esau? The Landover Baptist Forum.
Deuteronomy 4:2
Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.
Yet the Mormons added. The result was the Book of Mormon (1), probably the most outrageous collection of psychedelic fantasies ever since the Qur'an. The Mormons still claim that they also revere the Bible but that is impossible as they decided that the Word of Jesus had to be supplemented with the drug-induced hallucinations of Mr. Smith. It remains an enigma why the Mormons would believe a collections of inconsistent and self-contradictory texts while a perfectly coherent and structured publication, the King James Version, would also be available.
It is hard to imagine that the Mormons could come up with anything even more ridiculous but now they have. The well-known sub-human creature, the Bigfoot, is supposedly none other than Cain (Genesis 4:1) himself, the son of Adam, the first murderer (Genesis 4:8).
Cain, after killing his brother Abel, was cursed by God and consigned to be a fugitive and vagabond and a mark or curse was placed upon him that would reveal his identity. In this variation of the story, that curse was the shape and form of a giant hairy beast that couldn’t die.
Genesis 4:15
And the LORD said unto him, Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. And the LORD set a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him.
Now, the Mormons claim that the mark looks like this!

Does this really look like a "mark" that would tell a spectator that this Creature should be slain? Obviously, it is ugly and repulsive but so is my wife also, and I've yet to meet a passer-by who would take her as Cain. The claim is ridiculous. This is what the Cain and Abel incident actually looked like!

I can see no hirsutism. A Caucasian and quite a good-looking fellow slaying his brother in rage.
My conclusion: Biblically, the Mormon claim fails miserably, as expected.
Now let us see, if this Mormon hypothesis is feasible regarding other available data on Bigfeet. It is not. We can presume that the Bigfoot is a real Creature, as it has been sighted thousands of times all across the Earth's Disk although mostly in North America. This a map of the known confirmed Bigfoot observations:

Now, if Cain had become an immortal sub-human roaming the Earth until the End of Times, this would be certainly possible. During the 6000 years of his existence, he would well have covered all the marked regions. BUT there is more. We have also data on the schedule of Bigfoot movements. It shows us that the latest sighting of the Bigfoot in Palin's Alaska was in January 2014. However, there was a simultaneous Bigfoot report in South Carolina. If Bigfoot was Cain, he would have had to be in two locations at the same moment. This is impossible. The Mormon theory collapses.
If not Cain, then WHO is the Bigfoot?
We have the answer (2). A previous True Christian™ report has actually investigated this issue. As always, we win and the moronic Mormon ideas lose.
The only question scientists should be asking about Bigfoot is which Biblical figure is he descended from.
Genesis 25:25 And the first came out red, all ouer like an hairy garment: and they called his name, Esau.
See also Genesis 27 which deals more with Esau's hirsute nature.
Or does Bigfoot come from the line of Ishmael?
Genesis 16:12 And he will be a wilde man; his hand will be against euery man, and euery mans hand against him: & he shal dwell in the presence of all his brethren.
Genesis 21:20 And God was with the lad, and he grew, and dwelt in the wildernesse, and became an archer.
As you can see, either one would be a likely candidate as an ancestor of Bigfoot. It is even possible that the children of Esau met and mated with the children of Ishmael, so both could be Patriarchs in the Bigfoot line.
Genesis 25:25 And the first came out red, all ouer like an hairy garment: and they called his name, Esau.
See also Genesis 27 which deals more with Esau's hirsute nature.
Or does Bigfoot come from the line of Ishmael?
Genesis 16:12 And he will be a wilde man; his hand will be against euery man, and euery mans hand against him: & he shal dwell in the presence of all his brethren.
Genesis 21:20 And God was with the lad, and he grew, and dwelt in the wildernesse, and became an archer.
As you can see, either one would be a likely candidate as an ancestor of Bigfoot. It is even possible that the children of Esau met and mated with the children of Ishmael, so both could be Patriarchs in the Bigfoot line.

Instead of proving anything, the Mormon claim gives us precious new insight into the corrupt nature of this false religion.
Yours in Christ,
Elmer

FOOTNOTES
1) The Book or Mormon or "The Outrageous Forgery of Alleged Gold Plates that Were translated into Anachronistic English and Never Seen before or After".
2) Des (a True Christian™ man) 2014: Bigfoot: Descendant of Ishmael or Esau? The Landover Baptist Forum.





Comment