[ayerea]

Re: SEX EDUCATION - Naughty Parts???

Dear Lord! No wonder you are unsaved. I can't imagine naming dirty sexual body parts after food. We certainly don't want kids to eat each other's forbidden parts. And don't you think Milk Jugs might be worse than the actual name for b--bs?

*cough*
They are milk jugs...
the purpose of breasts is to feed milk to your baby to give it the things it needs to survive and fat to keep it warm. and have something to eat while it dosnt have any teeth.
so milk jugs are a good name for them

[Arcticdawn]

Re: SEX EDUCATION - Naughty Parts???

Well, as our bodies were made in the image of God, and we were given a commandment to go forth and multiply, and replenish the Earth, I would say that the parts in and of themselves are not 'naughty,' but improper use of them is.

Common traditional terms for a man's penis have been 'member' and 'virile rod.'

If you're looking for a scriptural answer for some of this, I would look to the Song of Solomon, though some consider that book as non-canonical as it really has nothing more to do with actual scripture, than perhaps acting as a metaphor for God's love for his Children.

[Sister Noddy]

Re: SEX EDUCATION - Naughty Parts???

If you're looking for a scriptural answer for some of this, I would look to the Song of Solomon, though some consider that book as non-canonical as it really has nothing more to do with actual scripture, than perhaps acting as a metaphor for God's love for his Children.

To read some interesting information about the book of Song of Solomon, go here ....

It is a small poetic book of only one hundred seventeen verses tucked away in the Old Testament between Ecclesiastes and Isaiah--easily passed by and overlooked. Those who delve into this love story often find--at every reading--subjectively fresh and meaningful insights into love, into relationships, into the Lord--and above all into his or her own person. An astonishing variety of interpretations is to be found among the published commentaries. However, the Song of Solomon does not defy rational exegetical analysis, as we shall see.

Interpreting Canticles

The Song of Solomon is the love story of a man and a woman. The courtship and wedding, are, however oriental in style and somewhat foreign to our Western customs. One's first approach to the Song should be to read it through identifying who is speaking: the man, the maiden, or "the daughters of Jerusalem." There are many illusions to unfamiliar places and to the flora and fauna of Israel. A commentary by Prof. Yehuda Feliks [Song of Songs: Nature Epic and Allegory, The Israel Society for Biblical Research, Jerusalem 1983] is very helpful in understanding the original language and the natural setting of the Song in the land of Israel. Feliks is a Botany teacher at Bar Ilan University in Israel as well as a Biblical and Talmudic scholar.

No reputable scholar considers Song of Solomon to be erotic literature. It is a love story and there is a clear progression both of self-understanding of the lovers, and in their relationship as the story unfolds.

In the traditional rabbinical view the Song depicts God's love for Israel his wife. God's courtship of Israel from the time she left Egypt is a theme running through the Bible.

[Daisy Mae Johnson]

Re: SEX EDUCATION - Naughty Parts???

Well, as our bodies were made in the image of God, and we were given a commandment to go forth and multiply, and replenish the Earth, I would say that the parts in and of themselves are not 'naughty,' but improper use of them is.

Son, I can assure you that GOD does not "tuck and tape". You have perverted HIS image. ~~~shudders~~~~


In addition, YOU cannot go forth and mulitply when you are as queer as a three dollar bill.

Please get right with the LORD before HE decides to kill you when you are wearing a dress.


Dismayed, Sister Thumper

[Arcticdawn]

Re: SEX EDUCATION - Naughty Parts???

Err... what?

You're coming out of left field here, unless you see something I typed that I didn't think I typed. I'm straight as an arrow, thank you, and I don't support transexuality or homosexuality in any form.

That said, I believe that physical intimacy is a sacred thing between a man and woman, Divinely ordained as a method by which man can continue his progeny. Hopefully that clarifies any questions regarding my stance on sexuality.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: SEX EDUCATION - Naughty Parts???

Err... what?

You're coming out of left field here, unless you see something I typed that I didn't think I typed. I'm straight as an arrow, thank you, and I don't support transexuality or homosexuality in any form.

That said, I believe that physical intimacy is a sacred thing between a man and woman, Divinely ordained as a method by which man can continue his progeny. Hopefully that clarifies any questions regarding my stance on sexuality.

Excellent news friend. You must understand we are naturally suspicious here since we have endless line of denigrates who read the most horrible things into what we say.

[Daisy Mae Johnson]

Re: SEX EDUCATION - Naughty Parts???

Err... what?

You're coming out of left field here, unless you see something I typed that I didn't think I typed. I'm straight as an arrow, thank you, and I don't support transexuality or homosexuality in any form.

That said, I believe that physical intimacy is a sacred thing between a man and woman, Divinely ordained as a method by which man can continue his progeny. Hopefully that clarifies any questions regarding my stance on sexuality.

Please clarify for me. Now I am confused.

You say you were born a male. But you feel like you are a woman trapped in a man's body so you dress like a woman.......

Don't women have sex with men? If you have sex with men, that makes you a homer.

If you got your tally wacker hacked off and are now prancing and frollicking about as a woman, then you would sleep with a man and that STILL MAKES YOU A HOMER and an ABOMINATION UNTO THE LORD.

Am I missing something?

This pic is of YOU dressed as a baby sissy girl. But I assume you have your male bits tucked inside of those frilly little undies...... How am I confused?

[Arcticdawn]

Re: SEX EDUCATION - Naughty Parts???

She's not serious is she? Or am I missing something integral to this conversation?

In the event that you're serious - I'll spell it out for you - I was born a male, am currently a man, intend to stay a man for the rest of Eternity, and intend to marry a nice, intelligent, woman(who was born a woman), beautiful in the ways of the Lord, and I intend to father many wonderful children.

In the event that you're joking - you need to bridge the gap between the outrageous and the actual statement a hare more in order to hit the right note with the humor. With a way to indicate that it was a joke, or if we had known each other better, it could have been hilarious.

Ah, and Bobby Joe, I have seen some of the posts you refer to, and I must say, I'm not impressed with those individuals. It seems to be a common theme that those who disagree with people who carry strong religious beliefs, that they must put forth some of the most vile filth in an attempt to desecrate any potentially worthwhile discussions on hand.

That said, thank you for your welcoming words.

[Glendora Christianson]

Re: SEX EDUCATION - Naughty Parts???

I was born a male, am currently a man, intend to stay a man for the rest of Eternity, and intend to marry a nice, intelligent, woman(who was born a woman), beautiful in the ways of the Lord, and I intend to father many wonderful children.

This is good news! But please promise us you do intend to become a Landover Baptist. Your life's goals have me concerned that you may be an "El Catlico" and we certainly don't need a bunch of Mary worshipping Welfare recipients running around, do we?

PS I am still looking for someone to sand and paint my patio furniture, and it's August!

[Brother Temperance]

Re: SEX EDUCATION - Naughty Parts???

If you're looking for a scriptural answer for some of this, I would look to the Song of Solomon, though some consider that book as non-canonical as it really has nothing more to do with actual scripture, than perhaps acting as a metaphor for God's love for his Children.

Song of Solomon 4:1 Behold, thou art fair, my love; behold, thou art fair; thou hast doves' eyes within thy locks: thy hair is as a flock of goats, that appear from mount Gilead.
2 Thy teeth are like a flock of sheep that are even shorn, which came up from the washing; whereof every one bear twins, and none is barren among them.
3 Thy lips are like a thread of scarlet, and thy speech is comely: thy temples are like a piece of a pomegranate within thy locks.
4 Thy neck is like the tower of David builded for an armoury, whereon there hang a thousand bucklers, all shields of mighty men.
5 Thy two breasts are like two young roes that are twins, which feed among the lilies.
So what's that bit a metaphor for? Why is God supposedly telling us we have nice breasts?

That said, I believe that physical intimacy is a sacred thing between a man and woman, Divinely ordained as a method by which man can continue his progeny. Hopefully that clarifies any questions regarding my stance on sexuality.

Do you Mormen not believe that physical intimacy between a man and as many women as he can find is a sacred thing?

She's not serious is she? Or am I missing something integral to this conversation?

In the event that you're serious - I'll spell it out for you - I was born a male, am currently a man, intend to stay a man for the rest of Eternity, and intend to marry a nice, intelligent, woman(who was born a woman), beautiful in the ways of the Lord, and I intend to father many wonderful children.

I believe Sister Thumper, who is 100% female and therefore 100% prone to addle-headedness, has somehow got you confused with the vile hippy abomination Ayerea or whatever it calls itself. Your avatar probably isn't helping, though.

[Sanjayo (Quarantined)]

Re: SEX EDUCATION - Naughty Parts???

This thread is giving me a boner.

[Daisy Mae Johnson]

Re: SEX EDUCATION - Naughty Parts???

This thread is giving me a boner.

You better start getting a boner for JESUS you little queer or get booted outta here!

[LikeHumansDo]

Re: SEX EDUCATION - Naughty Parts???

All this sex talk makes me hot.

[Sanjayo (Quarantined)]

Re: SEX EDUCATION - Naughty Parts???

You better start getting a boner for JESUS you little queer or get booted outta here!

its okay i love jesus when i play pokemon i always name my cyndaquil jesus becuase cyndaquil is good

[Glendora Christianson]

Re: SEX EDUCATION - Naughty Parts???

All this sex talk makes me hot.

Our Lord Jesus Christ would prefer that you practice your "M" activity elsewhere. Church is not an appropriate place for sex.*

*Catlicks excluded, of course.