Re: Cars and God, does he hate the Honda NSX?
"The Holy Bible was written by men divinely inspired and is God's revelation of Himself to man. It is a perfect treasure of divine instruction. It has God for its author, salvation for its end, and truth, without any mixture of error, for its matter. Therefore, all Scripture is totally true and trustworthy."
If that was true then why would you be using a King James version and not what was originally written? Was Gods word not good enough and needed to be revised?
Originally posted by Ezekiel Bathfire
View Post
As for "credible" sources I said this; If I tell my son to tell his son to tell his son *repeat*, would the outcome of what I originally said 1000 years after be the same? No, I think not./QUOTE]I do not think you have been paying attention - The Word of God is in KJV1611. The 1611 bit gives you a clue as to its age.
I am sure that you are happy to accept the accuracy of the text of various writers e.g. Shakespeare, Donne, etc., who wrote before 1611. If so, why do you question God?
Read this:
"The Holy Bible was written by men divinely inspired and is God's revelation of Himself to man. It is a perfect treasure of divine instruction. It has God for its author, salvation for its end, and truth, without any mixture of error, for its matter. Therefore, all Scripture is totally true and trustworthy."
OK?
I am sure that you are happy to accept the accuracy of the text of various writers e.g. Shakespeare, Donne, etc., who wrote before 1611. If so, why do you question God?
Read this:
"The Holy Bible was written by men divinely inspired and is God's revelation of Himself to man. It is a perfect treasure of divine instruction. It has God for its author, salvation for its end, and truth, without any mixture of error, for its matter. Therefore, all Scripture is totally true and trustworthy."
OK?
If that was true then why would you be using a King James version and not what was originally written? Was Gods word not good enough and needed to be revised?
Comment