X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Faith_Machine
    Dyed-in-the-wool True Christian™
    True Christian™
    • Mar 2011
    • 10050

    #1

    Jews upset about "Foreskin Man"

    Jewish Groups Blast Foreskin Man Comic Book



    LOS ANGELES - A politically motivated comic book pitting a blond superhero called "Foreskin Man" against a sinister-looking "Monster Mohel" is causing a serious flap in California.

    The colorful series was created by the "intactivist" group MGMBill.org as part of its campaign to ban circumcision through ballot initiatives.

    The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) is blasting it as overtly anti-Semitic.

    "'Foreskin Man,' with its grotesque anti-Semitic imagery and themes, reaches a new low and is disrespectful and deeply offensive," Nancy J. Appel, ADL Associate Regional Director, said in a statement Friday.

    The online series portrays a menacing-looking mohel - someone specially trained to perform the traditional Jewish circumcision ceremony - waving bloody scissors over a screaming baby laid out on a pool table.

    Appel said the imagery invokes the "age-old anti-Semitic canards" such as the blood libel, the accusation that Jews ritually murder Christian children...




    Those of you who know me are aware that I have Jewish blood in my veins. Therefore, I think I know a thing or two about Jews and their queer rituals.

    "Blood libel" is when you falsely accuse Jews (or Sister Sarah Palin) of intentionally killing gentiles, which is something they generally don't do. Usually, if you're a gentile and you want to avoid having your death caused by Jews, it's a simple matter of making sure you don't have a Jewish wife or mother-in-law who might nag you to death or accidentally poison you with gefilte fish.

    So, again, "blood libel" is by nature a false accusation. Nobody is disputing the fact that Jews cut the foreskins off their infant sons, however, so I don't see how this could possibly be any type of libel?
    WARNING:
    In accordance with article 7 of the Swaggart Amendment to the Landover Baptist Church Constitution, you are hereby notified that this forum user is a
    REGISTERED SPIRITUAL PREDATOR, and prohibited from sending or receiving personal messages, text messages, or instant messages to forum users below the rank of True Christian™. This user is further prohibited from engaging with any persons in real-time audio or video "chats" via Web cams, Skype, Facetime, or any other Internet audio/video technology or service.
  • Ezekiel Bathfire
    Pastor for Diversity and Tolerance
    Christ's Rottweiler
     
    • Jan 2008
    • 22892

    #2
    Re: Jews upset about "Foreskin Man"

    Jesus freed us from this



    I think God had enough foreskins when David presented 200 to the king:

    1 Samuel:18:27 Wherefore David arose and went, he and his men, and slew of the Philistines two hundred men; and David brought their foreskins, and they gave them in full tale to the king, that he might be the king's son in law. And Saul gave him Michal his daughter to wife.


    Those Joos are still living in the Bronze Age
    sigpic


    “We must reassert that the essence of Christianity is the love of obedience to God’s Laws and that how that complete obedience is used or implemented does not concern us.”

    Author of such illuminating essays as,
    Map of the Known World; Periodic Table of Elements; The History of Linguistics; The Errors of Wicca; Dolphins and Evolution; The History of Landover (The Apology); Landover and the Civil War; 2000 Racial Slurs.

    Comment

    • Cursed
      Recovering Bastard
      Head of Landover Glee Club
      True Christian™
      • Jan 2011
      • 1363

      #3
      Re: Jews upset about "Foreskin Man"

      Jews are gross!

      I don't know if they're grosser than arabs, but it's pretty damn close.
      The vine is dried up, and the fig tree languisheth; the pomegranate tree, the palm tree also, and the apple tree, even all the trees of the field, are withered: because joy is withered away from the sons of men.~Joel 1:12

      Comment

      • Faith_Machine
        Dyed-in-the-wool True Christian™
        True Christian™
        • Mar 2011
        • 10050

        #4
        Re: Jews upset about "Foreskin Man"

        Hey, cut me some slack! I try really hard to reduce my grossness as much as I can!

        For example, I exfoliate on a regular basis, and I'm careful not to leave the house with matzo ball soup stains anywhere on my clothing or in my hair.
        WARNING:
        In accordance with article 7 of the Swaggart Amendment to the Landover Baptist Church Constitution, you are hereby notified that this forum user is a
        REGISTERED SPIRITUAL PREDATOR, and prohibited from sending or receiving personal messages, text messages, or instant messages to forum users below the rank of True Christian™. This user is further prohibited from engaging with any persons in real-time audio or video "chats" via Web cams, Skype, Facetime, or any other Internet audio/video technology or service.

        Comment

        • Bob4God
          Moderator
          Arms Dealer for CHRIST
          Hands folded for Jesus
           
          • Apr 2008
          • 5274

          #5
          Re: Jews upset about "Foreskin Man"

          Of course True Christians understand that circumcision isn't a Heaven-or-Hell issue.

          Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but the keeping of the commandments of God. - 1 Corinthians 7:19

          JESUS was circumcised however, and JESUS taught by example, so I am sure that when He decided as an infant to have His foreskin cut off, He was thinking about us. (Luke 2:21)

          I do not want my words to be taken as a defense of the radical liberal agenda to take away parents' rights by banning circumcision.

          The forcible removal of foreskins from infant penises should remain legal for three reasons:

          1. Foreskins make sex and self-abuse too easy and too pleasurable.

          Why jeopardize your Christian son's soul with unnecessary temptations and excess pleasures, when his purpose is to glorify GOD and eventually make it into Heaven?

          Foreskins require cleaning in the bath, and we want to prevent bath-time temptations, not encourage them!

          2. Circumcision is solely the parents' (the father's) decision.

          Saying that a boy should be allowed to reach adulthood to decide for himself whether or not to be circumcised totally negates the entire point of circumcision, which subjugation of the child before GOD and parents. (Genesis 17:11)

          Parent serves GOD, child serves GOD and parent, foreskin goes into medical waste. Everybody's happy.

          3. Mexicans have foreskins.

          True Christian Caucasians are doing everything we can to protect our GODly way of life from the brown tidal wave surging towards us from Mexico.

          They're taking over our neighborhoods, our politics, and our culture. Do we want them to take over our penises, too?

          Infant circumcision is a proud American tradition, and it would be a shame to have carried it this far forward from the 1800s only to give up now and let the Mexicans force us into letting our kids have any say in matters directly relating to private parts which aren't really theirs in the first place.

          What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is
          in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own?
          - 1 Corinthians 6:19
          sigpic
          The eyes of the LORD are in every place, beholding the evil and the good.
          - Proverbs 15:3

          CHILDREN'S STORY: TIMMY ON TRIAL


          CHRISTIAN ADVICE AND MESSAGES OF HOPE! GOD'S GREATEST HITS!


          Comment

          Working...