I couldn't believe when I read this article. A Federal judge has decided that Pennsylvania's anti-blasphemy law, which gave staff the responsibility of rejecting any blasphemous business names, is unconstitutional!
They go on to explain the "Lemon v. Kurtzmann" test and why the law fails on all counts, and suggests reading the long-winded decision because it explains the history of blasphemy laws. In detail.
The fellow suing wanted to call his film company "I Choose Hell Productions". No doubt, he does!
I don't know about you, but I just can't wait to stop for a hot dog at "Jesus Can Eat Our Weiners", across the way from the "Body of Christ" strip club. Then I can pick up some craft supplies at "Hell in a Handbasket", and who knows where I'll get to go for groceries or gas?[/sarcasm]
In a 68-page decision, a Federal judge has declared a Pennsylvania blasphemy law unconstitutional, due to its “predominant religious purpose”.
The law forbade words constituting “blasphemy”, “profane cursing or swearing”, or “profan[ing] the name of the Lord” in the name of a corporation. Passed in 1977, the law was a response to numerous complaints arising from a shopkeeper naming his store “The God Damn Gun Shop”.
The law forbade words constituting “blasphemy”, “profane cursing or swearing”, or “profan[ing] the name of the Lord” in the name of a corporation. Passed in 1977, the law was a response to numerous complaints arising from a shopkeeper naming his store “The God Damn Gun Shop”.
The fellow suing wanted to call his film company "I Choose Hell Productions". No doubt, he does!
I don't know about you, but I just can't wait to stop for a hot dog at "Jesus Can Eat Our Weiners", across the way from the "Body of Christ" strip club. Then I can pick up some craft supplies at "Hell in a Handbasket", and who knows where I'll get to go for groceries or gas?[/sarcasm]




Comment