[Zechariah Smyth]

Re: Sex with Children: It's not perverted

In case you dropped out of high school.

Please use complete sentences.

You don't need to put a line after every sentence.

There were two complete thoughts. Separating them seemed appropriate. I apologize if that confused you.

Yours Sincerely

You don't need to capitalize "sincerely."

piffle You.

These devil worshipers always resort to potty language!



YiC,

Z. Smyth

[xXGodIsntRealXx]

Re: Sex with Children: It's not perverted

Please use complete sentences.



There were two complete thoughts. Separating them seemed appropriate. I apologize if that confused you.



You don't need to capitalize "sincerely."



These devil worshipers always resort to potty language!



YiC,

Z. Smyth

In case you have zero sense of humor I was merely copying your sorry excuse for a sentence.

[Zechariah Smyth]

Re: Sex with Children: It's not perverted

In case you have zero sense of humor I was merely copying your sorry excuse for a sentence.

This is not a humor thread, young lady. Please use the search function to locate those.

YiC,

Z. Smyth

[Isaac Fisher]

Re: Sex with Children: It's not perverted

I don't think you're a bad person... I just think you need to rethink your stance.

God can't forgive you if you don't believe in Him. Please, convert now and may save your soul.

[braylix]

Re: Sex with Children: It's not perverted

I have been criticized unfairly by liberal Christians and atheists for being a "pedophile."

First of all, I would like to say I am not a pedophile. I have never had sex with a child, but I am not necessarily opposed to the idea.

I was unfairly labeled a pedophile simply for my Biblically-correct statements that having sex with toddlers and children is not prohibited by scripture.
For some reason, this is very upsetting to people, and I would to explain why they're overreacting.

The Holy Scriptures provides an algorithm for human life. A set of rules to follow step by step to solve problems and avoid sin.

For instance, in Leviticus chapter 20, GOD provides a list of instructions regarding whom we may not have sex with. Some of these are quite well-known, such as GOD's commands not to have sex with members of the same sex.

Among other prohibitions are sex with your uncle's wife (Leviticus 20:20), sex with your neighbor's wife (Leviticus 20:10), sex with your own mother (Leviticus 20:11), and sex with animals. (Leviticus 20:15)

One by one, GOD crosses potential sexual partners for us off a list provided in Leviticus 20, but nowhere on that list does GOD prohibit us having sex with children and babies.

LIBERAL CHRISTIANS SAY GOD DIDN'T MENTION SOME THINGS BECAUSE THEY'RE PLAINLY OBVIOUS...

First of all, how can it be morally wrong if GOD has not said it is wrong?

GOD is the source of all goodness, and only He can decide if something is good or bad.

Because it is written, Be ye holy; for I am holy. - 1 Peter 1:16

There is one lawgiver:

There is one lawgiver, who is able to save and to destroy: who art thou that judgest another? - James 4:17

It should be clear that we as humans are not entitled to decide for GOD what he wants us to do and doesn't want us to do.

Also, it should be clear that it is wrong to take something that isn't yours, but GOD still takes the time to say it is wrong. So do not accuse Him of being ambiguous on a topic just because it is obviously wrong. GOD has all His bases covered.

IS IT WRONG TO HAVE SEX WITH CHILDREN?

In Numbers 31:18 the Children of Israel are entitled to keep all the female children that are virgins for themselves.

For what reason do they need to be virgins?

Is it fair to conclude that they were taken as wives and slaves?

The Bible is silent on their ages, but the number of female virgins captured in the battle was 32,000. This leaves ample room for toddlers and babies, since GOD does not trouble Himself with "age of consent" nonsense.

In fact, sexual consent is not an issue that GOD ever troubles himself with.

Consent implies victimhood, and if GOD cared about such liberal nonsense, what could He have been thinking when He ordered rapists to marry their victims?

Surely such a command is insensitive to what the victim feels. Fortunately, GOD does not care what the "victim" feels, and is far more concerned about the fact that the man hadn't married the woman before he went into her.

Clearly the most important moral issues with sex are marriage and gender.

I say therefore to the unmarried and widows, it is good for them if they abide even as I.

But if they cannot contain, let them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn. - 1 Corinthians 7:8-9

Marrying for sex is Biblical, and there are no limits set on the age of those being married, and no objection from GOD in taking wives of any age.

CONCLUSION: PEDOPHILIA IS NOT PERVERTED

If people really understood the Bible, they would understand that GOD's concern is only that we be married to a human baby of the opposite gender before we have sexual relations with it.

Sex before marriage is perverted. (Exodus 20:14)

Sex with a person of the same gender is perverted. (Leviticus 18:22)

Sex with your sister is perverted. (Leviticus 20:17)

Sex with babies is not perverted.

first off your sick, second the Bible clearly tells us that sex is to be between married couples, and is to produce children , now it was common, in the days of the bible, when a young lady began her menstral cycle she was to be wed, same as the son, when he came of age, so seeing how toddlers and babies are unable to produce children there for it is a sin to have sex with a child, now as time progressed the age of consent has changed,

[Bob4God]

Re: Sex with Children: It's not perverted

second the Bible clearly tells us that sex is to be between married couples, and is to produce children

Hold on there, cowboy.

I never said sex wasn't to be between married people. If you had read my post, you would see that I said sex with a 5 year-old is okay as long as the 5 year-old is married to whoever is having sex with him or her, and as long as the spouse is of the opposite gender.

Show me in scripture where GOD specifically says we cannot have sex with children the way scripture tells us we cannot have sex with a consenting adult of the same gender. Chapter and verse, please.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Sex with Children: It's not perverted

the Bible clearly tells us that sex is to be between married couples, and is to produce children

Chapter and verse for both of these assertions, please.

[Spike the Scottish Poof]

Re: Sex with Children: It's not perverted

I never said sex wasn't to be between married people. If you had read my post, you would see that I said sex with a 5 year-old is okay as long as the 5 year-old is married to whoever is having sex with him or her, and as long as the spouse is of the opposite gender.

I really don't think the 5 year old's parents will marry them off to you. Parental consent and all that.

But wouldn't you want to marry someone your own age? Personally, you should only ever marry when you are happy with the person you are with, and you both love each other.

In another thread, you (Not you personally, the term for a true christian) are saying that atheists are as bad as sex offenders, so are you now not contradicting yourself as marrying a 5 year old would make you a sex offender?

[Pastor Isaac Peters]

Re: Sex with Children: It's not perverted

I really don't think the 5 year old's parents will marry them off to you. Parental consent and all that.

In today's apostate society, you have a point, but things will be different once everyone follows Biblical morality again.

But wouldn't you want to marry someone your own age? Personally, you should only ever marry when you are happy with the person you are with, and you both love each other.

Can you back that up with Scripture?

In another thread, you (Not you personally, the term for a true christian) are saying that atheists are as bad as sex offenders, so are you now not contradicting yourself as marrying a 5 year old would make you a sex offender?

Once Biblical law is restored, nothing that God permits will make you an offender.

[Spike the Scottish Poof]

Re: Sex with Children: It's not perverted

Can you back that up with Scripture?

No, if you read my post, I said personally.

[Pastor Isaac Peters]

Re: Sex with Children: It's not perverted

No, if you read my post, I said personally.

So why should we care about your personal opinion? It also appears that you can't answer my other points.

[Spike the Scottish Poof]

Re: Sex with Children: It's not perverted

There is a slight difference between can't and won't friend. I won't answer those questions because when you are talking of Biblical Morality, and once that takes over everything will be fine, I'm afraid I'm going to argue with you and I really do not want to do that. Not because I'm afraid I'll loose to you, because I like being on this site, and I don't wish to be banned.

[Godfly]

Re: Sex with Children: It's not perverted

first off your sick, second the Bible clearly tells us that sex is to be between married couples, and is to produce children , now it was common, in the days of the bible, when a young lady began her menstral cycle she was to be wed, same as the son, when he came of age, so seeing how toddlers and babies are unable to produce children there for it is a sin to have sex with a child, now as time progressed the age of consent has changed,

You should really read Brother Bob4God's entire message before embarrassing yourself like this. He clearly makes the case that sex with a child is a sin if that child is the same sex as you and if you have sex with the child before you marry the child. Bob4God is only talking about sex between married children and adults. As for this age of consent nonsense you are spouting it has nothing to do with anything. It doesn't matter if the child consents because God has already blessed the union. Why would you follow the childish screams for mercy of some spoiled brat over ther word of God? You are the one who is sick.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Sex with Children: It's not perverted

No, if you read my post, I said personally.

Yes, you said, "Personally, you should . . ."

You are telling us what we should do. That's what "you should" means.

If you meant to say what you want for yourself, then you should (see how that works?) start the sentence, "Personally, I will . . ."

See the difference?

Say what you mean, Spike. We aren't mind readers. Mind reading is the sin of witchcraft.

[Titus Templeton]

Re: Sex with Children: It's not perverted

I don't like atheists but even the famous atheist FReud has said that children first like oral. Because of that children like woman nippels.
Then they start like anal and such. So you see even atheist understand that its ok as long as they are married.(But anal is a vorbidden practise)