Tweet
While watching Fox News this morning, I almost gagged when Robby Mook, Clinton's campaign manager, gave a short interview.
The Bible tells us (Matthew 7:16) that we will be able to recognize whether or not someone is a child of God. How fitting that the LORD GOD chose to use "fruit" in this verse. "Mr." Mook is obviously a homer with his thin lipped, toothy continuous smile. It would make sense that she would choose a gay to lead her demonic attempt to take over our nation for satan's purposes. When I mentioned my observation to Satin Mandomer, the secretary who always listens to EWTN, she said, "God wouldn't be happy that you don't love gay people. He says to love your neighbor."
Brethren: that leads me to a question that I hope one of the senior pastors will address - or anyone with knowledge greater than I might address (although, as a certified equine gnathologist about to become a veterinarian by mail, it may be hard to surpass my knowledge - and I say that with humility). (Philippians 2:3)
Satin is correct that we are to love our neighbor (Mark 12:31). Does this mean that I should love Antoine and Damon, the homers in Apt 12-C? They are my neighbors. I have not put them to death because we live under our Lord's command to respect the law (Ezra 7:26) (Romans 2:13) and yet we read of our duty in (Leviticus 20:13) that it is honorable in God's sight for the gaywise to be put to death. And before any unsaved trash starts screaming, "That's a contradiction!!" just sit down, you godmocker. The Bible has no contradictions - you're just trying to use a private interpretation, which is so wrong. (2 Peter 1:20). There are many passages which state or imply that the authors of the Bible were inspired by God. Since errors, mistakes and duplicity are not generally regarded as qualities of God, inspiration by God would imply inerrancy of the text. However, since GOD is perfect, He provides us with proof within His Book that His Book is also perfect: (Psalms 12:6) (Psalms 119:89) (Proverbs 30:5-6)
I have never been cruel to my queer neighbors but I have also not made it a point to speak to them other than the one day when Antoine had on a fabulous tie and I confess that I felt its texture. At no point did we make physical contact (I feared contracting the AIDS). And I did speak to Damon when I noticed his fly was open. I normally would not have even mentioned it, lest I embarrass him, but I believe it would have been a sin not to tell him (James 4:17).
So, am I left to love my neighbor even though he is a gaywise sodomite with AIDS germs and rectal demons?
Can someone shed light on this? Satin went on to say we should love the sinner and hate the sin. I was quick to point out that she was being ridiculous. Jesus did NOT say that, and that whole idea seems to contradict everything our beautiful, manly Savior was all about.
Hiding behind love the sinner, hate the sin is just using Jesus as justification for the kind of behavior he would be quite appalled by.
Am I hearing the Holy Ghost correctly, brothers?
The Bible tells us (Matthew 7:16) that we will be able to recognize whether or not someone is a child of God. How fitting that the LORD GOD chose to use "fruit" in this verse. "Mr." Mook is obviously a homer with his thin lipped, toothy continuous smile. It would make sense that she would choose a gay to lead her demonic attempt to take over our nation for satan's purposes. When I mentioned my observation to Satin Mandomer, the secretary who always listens to EWTN, she said, "God wouldn't be happy that you don't love gay people. He says to love your neighbor."
Brethren: that leads me to a question that I hope one of the senior pastors will address - or anyone with knowledge greater than I might address (although, as a certified equine gnathologist about to become a veterinarian by mail, it may be hard to surpass my knowledge - and I say that with humility). (Philippians 2:3)
Satin is correct that we are to love our neighbor (Mark 12:31). Does this mean that I should love Antoine and Damon, the homers in Apt 12-C? They are my neighbors. I have not put them to death because we live under our Lord's command to respect the law (Ezra 7:26) (Romans 2:13) and yet we read of our duty in (Leviticus 20:13) that it is honorable in God's sight for the gaywise to be put to death. And before any unsaved trash starts screaming, "That's a contradiction!!" just sit down, you godmocker. The Bible has no contradictions - you're just trying to use a private interpretation, which is so wrong. (2 Peter 1:20). There are many passages which state or imply that the authors of the Bible were inspired by God. Since errors, mistakes and duplicity are not generally regarded as qualities of God, inspiration by God would imply inerrancy of the text. However, since GOD is perfect, He provides us with proof within His Book that His Book is also perfect: (Psalms 12:6) (Psalms 119:89) (Proverbs 30:5-6)
I have never been cruel to my queer neighbors but I have also not made it a point to speak to them other than the one day when Antoine had on a fabulous tie and I confess that I felt its texture. At no point did we make physical contact (I feared contracting the AIDS). And I did speak to Damon when I noticed his fly was open. I normally would not have even mentioned it, lest I embarrass him, but I believe it would have been a sin not to tell him (James 4:17).
So, am I left to love my neighbor even though he is a gaywise sodomite with AIDS germs and rectal demons?
Can someone shed light on this? Satin went on to say we should love the sinner and hate the sin. I was quick to point out that she was being ridiculous. Jesus did NOT say that, and that whole idea seems to contradict everything our beautiful, manly Savior was all about.
Hiding behind love the sinner, hate the sin is just using Jesus as justification for the kind of behavior he would be quite appalled by.
Am I hearing the Holy Ghost correctly, brothers?
I think the simplest solution to your problem is: choose your neighbors wisely. 
Comment