X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Parabola
    Unsaved trash
     
    • Sep 2008
    • 43

    #31
    Re: Homosexuals are people too

    Indications that Jesus did have a homosexual orientation:

    "In the Gospel of John, the disciple John frequently refers to himself in the third person as 'the disciple whom Jesus loved'." One might argue that Jesus loved all of his followers in a non-sexual way. Thus to identify Jesus' love for John in a special way might indicate a sexual relationship. The disciple was "the" beloved. He was in a class by himself. During the Last Supper before Jesus' execution, the author(s) of the Gospel of John describes how the "beloved" disciple laid himself on Jesus' inner tunic -- his undergarment. See John 13:25 and 21:20. Robert Goss, assistant professor of comparative religion at Webster University in St. Louis, LA, noted that Jesus and the beloved disciple: "... eat together, side by side. What's being portrayed here is a pederastic relationship between an older man and a younger man. A Greek reader would understand." Jesus appears to have loved all of his male and female followers in a close, trusting, non-erotic manner.



    "Jagannath" interprets the Gospels differently. He argues that Jesus may have been bisexual. He wrote:
    "In the Book of John a word is used eight times that means 'is in love with' with the implication of sexual intimacy. Five times it is used with reference to Jesus' relationship with John. Once it is used to define Jesus' relationship with Lazarus. And it is also used to describe his relationship with Mary and with her sister Martha."

    During the crucifixion, in John 19:26-28, Jesus is described as seeing his mother and an unidentified man: "the disciple standing by, whom he loved." Again, Jesus probably loved all of his 12 or 70 disciples in a non-sexual manner. But this particular disciple is identified as "the" disciple who Jesus loved. That might indicate a special intimate relationship with one special disciple.

    The late Morton Smith, of Columbia University reported in 1958 that he had found a fragment of a manuscript which at the Mar Saba monastery near Jerusalem. It contained the full text of Mark, chapter 10. Apparently the version that is in the Christian Scriptures is an edited version of the original. Additional verses allegedly formed part of the full version of Mark, and were inserted after verse 34. It discusses how a young man, naked but for a linen covering, expressed his love for Jesus and stayed with him at his place all night. More details.

    "J Richards" suggested that Mark 7:14-16 shows that Jesus approves of homosexual acts. The critical phrase reads: "There is nothing from without a man, that entering into him can defile him..." Richards suggests that Jesus gave great emphasis to this teaching, directing it to everyone. Richards suggests that the sentence refers to dietary laws and also extends to "blood transfusions, medication, organ transplants, and artificial insemination" and to homosexual acts as well

    Rollan McCleary, was awarded his doctorate from the University of Queensland in Australia during 2003-MAY for his work researching the sexual orientation of Jesus and his disciples. He obtained about $33,000 US in funding from the government to finance his degree. He concluded that Jesus and at least three of his disciples were gay. He based this conclusion on excerpts from the Gospel of John and on Jesus' astrological chart based on the approximate year, month, day and place where he was born. But not even the year of Jesus' birth is known. Many theologians have concluded that Jesus was born sometime in the Fall, between 4 and 7 BCE. Also, there is disagreement about where Jesus was born. Different theologians argue Bethlehem in Judea, Nazareth, and Bethlehem in the Galilee. The task of creating an astrological chart appears quite impossible. Dr. McCleary told Australian Broadcasting Commission radio that, in the past, "one or two queer theologians" had attempted to show Jesus was gay. "People haven't taken them very seriously because they don't have any evidence and they say things so sensationally that people are not really going to listen or just be very angry. What I'm doing is showing a much more theological and also astrological dimension on all this which will make a lot more sense to people." He has written a book based on his doctoral thesis which was published in 2004.

    An anonymous webmaster wrote about a revelation that he received during her/his daily prayer and meditation:
    "Suddenly many aspects of the New Testament made sense. Jesus never married. He preached love, tolerance, and forgiveness of sins. He did not condemn and vilify as his so-called followers do today. He surrounded himself with men whom he loved. The Bible says nothing of Jesus' sexuality, yet we are taught that he was both divine and fully man. Why did he never marry? Why is the New Testament silent about his sexuality? It became so clear when I had the insight that Jesus was probably gay and that He understood hatred and bigotry first-hand."


    Mark 14:51-52 describes the incident when Jesus was arrested by the religious police. It describes how one of Jesus' followers was scantily dressed. The King James Version says he had a linen cloth cast on his naked body; the size and location of the cloth is not defined. The New International Version says that he was "wearing nothing but a linen garment." When the police tried to seize him, they were able to grab only his cloth; the man ran away naked. Reverend Peter Murphy wrote: "We don't know from the sources what really was going on, but we do know that something was very peculiar between Jesus and young men." (Emphasis in the original.)


    Michael Kelly wrote of Jesus' attitude towards a same-sex couple as described in Matthew 8:5-13: and Luke 7:2: "One day a Roman Centurion asked him to heal his dying servant. Scholars of both Scripture and Ancient History tell us that Roman Centurions, who were not permitted to marry while in service, regularly chose a favorite male slave to be their personal assistant and sexual servant. Such liaisons were common in the Greco-Roman world and it was not unusual for them to deepen into loving partnerships....Jesus offered to go to the servant, but the centurion asked him simply to speak a word of healing, since he was not worthy to welcome this itinerant Jewish teacher under his roof. Jesus responded by healing the servant and proclaiming that even in Israel he had never found faith like this! So, in the one Gospel story where Jesus encountered people sharing what we would call a 'gay relationship,' we see him simply concerned about — and deeply moved by — their faith and love." Kelly implies that Jesus' sensitivity towards the gay couple might have arisen from his own bisexual or homosexual orientation.


    Some commentators argue from silence. They note that there is no passage in the Christian Scriptures (New Testament) that directly describes anything about Jesus' sexuality. There are many direct and indirect references to Jesus' sensuality. He was accused of being a "drunkard and a glutton" and of partying with "prostitutes and sinners." He apparently enjoyed a tender foot massage from a woman. Yet, neither Jesus' sexuality nor his celibacy is mentioned. Yet, sex is referred to, elsewhere in the Bible, quite often. One might argue that the books in the Christian Scriptures might have once described Jesus' sexual relationships, but that these passages have been vigorously censored by the later church because they were unconventional.


    Other commentators have noted that Jesus is silent towards homosexuality in the Gospels. Yet, Paul's opinions and those of many other authors in the Hebrew Scriptures (Old Testament) are clearly stated. They conclude that Jesus might have been gay. Odler Jeanlouie speculated: "Is it meaningful that, in the Sermon on the Mount, central to his teaching, he offered a one-way trip to the Kingdom of God, to anyone who is persecuted?"

    Είναι θεούληδες, μην τους βρίζετε

    Comment

    • Parabola
      Unsaved trash
       
      • Sep 2008
      • 43

      #32
      Re: Homosexuals are people too

      By the way, I have plenty of thoughts of my own. This is just stuff written by experts.

      Oh, and as for the cut+paste... Isn't this what you guys do with the bible all the time?
      Είναι θεούληδες, μην τους βρίζετε

      Comment

      • Jean Poole
        Mother of 20
        True Christian™
        • Sep 2008
        • 384

        #33
        Re: Homosexuals are people too

        Originally posted by Parabola View Post
        By the way, I have plenty of thoughts of my own.
        I have yet to see any evidence of this.
        God hates Seth Cochrane.

        Comment

        • Ezekiel Bathfire
          Pastor for Diversity and Tolerance
          Christ's Rottweiler
           
          • Jan 2008
          • 22833

          #34
          Re: Homosexuals are people too

          Originally posted by Parabola View Post
          * Indications that Jesus did have a homosexual orientation:
          This is pure (or rather impure) and willful mis-reading

          "In the Gospel of John, the disciple John frequently refers to himself in the third person as 'the disciple whom Jesus loved'." One might argue that…
          Well, one might argue anything! Nevertheless, it is corrected later.
          Jesus appears to have loved all of his male and female followers in a close, trusting, non-erotic manner.

          "Jagannath" interprets the Gospels differently.
          Do you really think that any Hindoo is going to have anything worthwhile to say about Jesus?
          "In the Book of John a word is used eight times that means 'is in love with' with the implication of sexual intimacy.
          What word?
          Once it is used to define Jesus' relationship with Lazarus.
          Oh, I see, it’s necrophilia now is it?
          During the crucifixion, in John 19:26-28, Jesus is described as seeing his mother and an unidentified man: "the disciple standing by, whom he loved."
          Just a minute! Have we not identified "the disciple […] whom he loved." As John?
          That might indicate a special intimate relationship with one special disciple.
          and then on the other hand, it might not…
          The late Morton Smith,
          Now rotting in Hell
          of Columbia University reported in 1958 that he had found a fragment of a manuscript [that]contained the full text of Mark, chapter 10. […] Additional verses […]discusses how a young man, naked but for a linen covering, expressed his love for Jesus and stayed with him at his place all night.
          The point being? Even if any of this were possible to be substantiated, even if Morton Smith were not a servant of Satan, all it shows is that Jesus didn’t let being tired stop Him from converting a friend to Christianity.
          "J Richards" suggested that Mark 7:14-16 shows that Jesus approves of homosexual acts.
          Note how Richards only “suggests” think of all the things that you can put in your mouth and you realize Richards’s agenda!
          Rollan McCleary, was awarded his doctorate from the University of Queensland in Australia during 2003-MAY for his work researching the sexual orientation of Jesus and his disciples. He obtained about $33,000 US in funding from the government to finance his degree. He concluded that Jesus and at least three of his disciples were gay. He based this conclusion on excerpts from the Gospel of John and on Jesus' astrological chart
          He got $30,000 of government money to practice witchcraft??? These Austrians take the cake, the oven, the kitchen and the house!!!
          An anonymous webmaster wrote […]
          An anonymous True Christian wrote, “This is all self-centered rubbish and without a shred of proof.”
          Mark 14:51-52 describes the incident when Jesus was arrested by the religious police. It describes how one of Jesus' followers was scantily dressed. […] Reverend Peter Murphy wrote: "We don't know from the sources what really was going on, but we do know that something was very peculiar between Jesus and young men."
          Hang on there boy – up above, you say that this all links in with the so-called “lost” part of Mark, yet here the source is unknown…
          Michael Kelly wrote of Jesus' attitude towards a same-sex couple as described in Matthew 8:5-13: and Luke 7:2: "One day a Roman Centurion asked him to heal his dying servant. Scholars of both Scripture and Ancient History tell us that Roman Centurions, who were not permitted to marry while in service, regularly chose a favorite male slave to be their personal assistant and sexual servant.
          If you ever find anything more speculative, let me know. Dear Lord! Is not a Roman to have a slave?
          Some commentators argue from silence.
          ...and some don't... anonymous sources cannot be credited. "The silence on Parabola's views on eating babies speaks volumes!!!

          Other commentators have noted
          ...and others have not... another anonymous source
          "Is it meaningful that, in the Sermon on the Mount, central to his teaching, he offered a one-way trip to the Kingdom of God, to anyone who is persecuted?"
          No, He refers to Christians being persecuted, and homers are not Christians.

          In future keep your posts to one point*, observe some sanity, don’t trust “Anonymous” or people who scam government money and more to the point, STOP BEING A HOMER!

          *This is so long a refutation that even I didn't read it!
          sigpic


          “We must reassert that the essence of Christianity is the love of obedience to God’s Laws and that how that complete obedience is used or implemented does not concern us.”

          Author of such illuminating essays as,
          Map of the Known World; Periodic Table of Elements; The History of Linguistics; The Errors of Wicca; Dolphins and Evolution; The History of Landover (The Apology); Landover and the Civil War; 2000 Racial Slurs.

          Comment

          • Parabola
            Unsaved trash
             
            • Sep 2008
            • 43

            #35
            Re: Homosexuals are people too

            FIY, I didn't call Jesus a Homer.. Homer wrote two epics Jesus couldn't even dream about. You should be familiar with one of them due to the Hollywood movie...

            If you wanna call someone gay, use "homo". Short for homophobe. Learn to speak, finally!
            Είναι θεούληδες, μην τους βρίζετε

            Comment

            • Brother Enoch
              The Godliest Man in Godless Canuckistan
              True Christian™
              • Jun 2008
              • 4392

              #36
              Re: Homosexuals are people too

              Originally posted by Parabola View Post
              FIY, I didn't call Jesus a Homer.. Homer wrote two epics Jesus couldn't even dream about. You should be familiar with one of them due to the Hollywood movie...

              If you wanna call someone gay, use "homo". Short for homophobe. Learn to speak, finally!
              Homo is not short for homophobe, homo is short for homosexual, idiot.

              Homer is a regional variation.

              Comment

              • Rev. M. Rodimer
                Honorary True Christian™
                Forum Member
                • May 2008
                • 13996

                #37
                Re: Homosexuals are people too

                Originally posted by Parabola View Post
                By the way, I have plenty of thoughts of my own. This is just stuff written by experts.

                Oh, and as for the cut+paste... Isn't this what you guys do with the bible all the time?
                No. We attribute the verses we quote. You plagiarized someone's paper and gave no attribution.

                See the difference?

                There's really no point in a line-by-line refutation of your idiotic post. Jesus is God. He says very clearly throughout His Word, the Bible, that sodomites are abominations, to be executed (preferably by stoning). He also says that fornication is a sin.

                For Him to be a queer, He would be an abomination unto Himself.

                Do you now see how ridiculous your position is?
                Bible boring? Nonsense!
                Try Bible in a Year with Brother V, or join Shirlee and the kids as they discuss Real Bible Stories!
                You can't be a Christian if you don't know God's Word!

                Comment

                • Parabola
                  Unsaved trash
                   
                  • Sep 2008
                  • 43

                  #38
                  Re: Homosexuals are people too

                  Yes, I feel so powerless...
                  Είναι θεούληδες, μην τους βρίζετε

                  Comment

                  • Ezekiel Bathfire
                    Pastor for Diversity and Tolerance
                    Christ's Rottweiler
                     
                    • Jan 2008
                    • 22833

                    #39
                    Re: Homosexuals are people too

                    Originally posted by Parabola View Post
                    FIY, I didn't call Jesus a Homer.. Homer wrote two epics Jesus couldn't even dream about. You should be familiar with one of them due to the Hollywood movie...

                    If you wanna call someone gay, use "homo". Short for homophobe. Learn to speak, finally!
                    You come here strumming your bouzouki, dropping humus all over the place, obviously drunk on Retsina and you cut and paste acres of someone else's text and then you have the audacity to tell me to speak American!

                    In future I will leave off the bit about “bearing gifts” in “Beware of Greeks…”
                    sigpic


                    “We must reassert that the essence of Christianity is the love of obedience to God’s Laws and that how that complete obedience is used or implemented does not concern us.”

                    Author of such illuminating essays as,
                    Map of the Known World; Periodic Table of Elements; The History of Linguistics; The Errors of Wicca; Dolphins and Evolution; The History of Landover (The Apology); Landover and the Civil War; 2000 Racial Slurs.

                    Comment

                    • Parabola
                      Unsaved trash
                       
                      • Sep 2008
                      • 43

                      #40
                      Re: Homosexuals are people too

                      Aww... Now I won't be able to sleep at nights.

                      By the way, bouzouki sucks. Retsina too

                      And for the last time, it's not American. It's either UK English or US English. The latter being just a stupid version of the original.
                      Είναι θεούληδες, μην τους βρίζετε

                      Comment

                      • The Raven
                        Confirmed Enemy of God
                        BANNED from Landover -- Aeternal Damnation Assured
                        • Oct 2008
                        • 27

                        #41
                        Re: Homosexuals are people too

                        Originally posted by Ebenezer Wright View Post
                        Homosexuals are not born like that, it comes from choosing to spit on God and to destroy the sanctity of marriage. They are to swimming in a sesspool of sin and Satan has grabbed ahold of them tightly.

                        Although the divorce rate is high for non-True Christians, it is still a bonding between a Man and a Woman! How can you support something soo disgusting and irregular! I can only assume that you are a supporter of AIDS?
                        Why would someone wake up one day and say "Hey. I think I'll be gay and hated by 'true christians' because I want to land myself in hell! Yes! I so wanna be gay!" No.
                        How are they gay then? Do they have connections with the devil they aren't aware about? Are they cursed? Did god put them on earth to just be hated? What?

                        Comment

                        • The Raven
                          Confirmed Enemy of God
                          BANNED from Landover -- Aeternal Damnation Assured
                          • Oct 2008
                          • 27

                          #42
                          Re: Homosexuals are people too

                          Originally posted by Ebenezer Wright View Post
                          Answer this for me! Why support something that is unnatural? Why support something that is one of the main causes of AIDs? Why support gays who make our society look like a bunch of rainbow loving sissyboys?
                          You don't have to support it, but you can resist the insults and comments aimed to make them feel like crap.

                          Answer this for me! Why do so many of you "true christians" bash homosexuality instead of trying to help a fellow human being from doing something you "know" is wrong? Why do you claim to just hate their lifestyles? If all you hate is their lifestyles, then why is there a need for words like faggot, sissy, etc.?

                          Comment

                          • Nobar King
                            Municipal Code Archivist - Deuteronomy 28:58
                            Christ's Guardian
                            True Christian™
                            • Sep 2007
                            • 23748

                            #43
                            Re: Homosexuals are people too

                            Do you know who coins those words? It's the sissies themselves. We just use them because they use them. Otherwise, how would we be understood?
                            May you be a blessing to every life you touch.

                            Comment

                            • greekqueer
                              Unsaved trash
                              • Mar 2009
                              • 5

                              #44
                              Re: Homosexuals are people too

                              gays are people too you guys can say they are not hear but they are and they do not care about what you say

                              Comment

                              • eliot mayfield
                                God Squad
                                True Christian™
                                • Sep 2006
                                • 9324

                                #45
                                Re: Homosexuals are people too

                                Originally posted by greekqueer View Post
                                gays are people too you guys can say they are not hear but they are and they do not care about what you say
                                If they could HEAR!!!!!! Loud enough???? they might care!
                                Matthew:
                                5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
                                5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled
                                10:21 And the brother shall deliver up the brother to death, and the father the child: and the children shall rise up against their parents, and cause them to be put to death.
                                10:34 Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.


                                sigpic

                                Comment

                                Working...