Tweet
An unelected liberal activist judge has legislated from the bench to grant homers and homeresses brand new special rights based on Constitutional hyper-technicalities.
From that missalette of militant faggotry, the JYT:
What about the government's supremely important interest in denying queers the special privilege of being treated like normal people, or in voting away the rights of anyone we don't like? I guess there's no longer a place for individual liberty or constitutionally limited government under the Obamanation.
From that missalette of militant faggotry, the JYT:
Judge Rules That Military Policy Violates Rights of Gays
The “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy toward gay members of the military is unconstitutional, a federal judge in California (where else?) ruled Thursday.
* * *
The plaintiffs challenged the law under the Fifth and First Amendments to the Constitution, and Judge Phillips agreed.
“The 'don’t ask, don’t tell' act infringes the fundamental rights of United States service members in many ways,” she wrote. “In order to justify the encroachment on these rights, defendants faced the burden at trial of showing the 'don’t ask, don’t tell' act was necessary to significantly further the government’s important interests in military readiness and unit cohesion. Defendants failed to meet that burden.”
The “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy toward gay members of the military is unconstitutional, a federal judge in California (where else?) ruled Thursday.
* * *
The plaintiffs challenged the law under the Fifth and First Amendments to the Constitution, and Judge Phillips agreed.
“The 'don’t ask, don’t tell' act infringes the fundamental rights of United States service members in many ways,” she wrote. “In order to justify the encroachment on these rights, defendants faced the burden at trial of showing the 'don’t ask, don’t tell' act was necessary to significantly further the government’s important interests in military readiness and unit cohesion. Defendants failed to meet that burden.”
Comment