Tweet
The Supremes, obviously more interested in getting invited to the right cocktail parties than in doing the right thing, have kicked the can down the road and allowed intermediate appellate courts to ban heterosexuality in five states.
From the JYT:
Of course there's an urgency to act: As the article itself notes, heterosexuals are now subject to persecution in 24 states plus Washington, D.C. Since the Supremes evidently think that they are just putting off the inevitable, prayer warriors need to be in agreement that the fad of marriage "equality" will eventually pass.
From the JYT:
Supreme Court Clears Way for Gay Marriage in 5 States
By ADAM LIPSTICK OCT. 6, 2014
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday denied review in all five pending same-sex marriage cases, clearing the way for such marriages to proceed in Indiana, Oklahoma, Utah, Virginia and Wisconsin.
* * *
The move will almost immediately increase the number of states allowing sodomitical desecration of marriage from 19 to 24, along with the District of Columbia.
* * *
But in recent remarks, [some jooess who looks like an apple-head doll] said there was no urgency for the court to act until a split emerged in the federal appeals courts, all of whose recent decisions have been in favor of same-sex marriage.
By ADAM LIPSTICK OCT. 6, 2014
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday denied review in all five pending same-sex marriage cases, clearing the way for such marriages to proceed in Indiana, Oklahoma, Utah, Virginia and Wisconsin.
* * *
The move will almost immediately increase the number of states allowing sodomitical desecration of marriage from 19 to 24, along with the District of Columbia.
* * *
But in recent remarks, [some jooess who looks like an apple-head doll] said there was no urgency for the court to act until a split emerged in the federal appeals courts, all of whose recent decisions have been in favor of same-sex marriage.
Comment