Originally posted by James Hutchins
View Post
by Matt Slick
Is homosexuality dangerous to society? The answer dependson what constitutes a danger. First of all, there is no objective moralstandard that secularists have with which to identify wickedness, evil, andmoral decay. At best, all that can be offered is the generic claim thatwhat is dangerous is what causes undue harm and suffering among the generalpopulation. Such dangers could include economic collapse or upheaval,war, famine, plague, earthquakes, disease, etc. We could add that dangersto society are things that weaken it, make it less viable to care for itspopulation, make it vulnerable to attack from outside and/or within. Thiscould be anything from bad religion to bad government. Also, such thingsas rampant lying, stealing, and murder would seriously undermine a healthysociety and be dangerous to it since they increase the harm and suffering ofthe society as a whole.
Okay, so now that we have something to work with, let's take alook at homosexuality and see if it is beneficial or harmful to society. Let's start with disease and see what the statistics teach us.
Disease
- 2% of U.S. population is gay yet it accounts for 61% of HIVinfection: "Men whohave sex with men [MSM] remain the group most heavily affected by new HIVinfections. While the CDC estimates that MSM represent only 2 percent of theU.S. population, they accounted for the majority (61 percent; 29,300) of allnew HIV infections in 2009. Young MSM (ages 13 to 29) were most severelyaffected, representing more than one quarter of all new HIV infectionsnationally (27 percent; 12,900 in 2009)." (Center for DiseaseControl, cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/HIVIncidencePressRelease.html)
- "A recent CDC study found that in 2008 one in five (19%)MSM in 21 major US cities were infected with HIV, and nearly half (44%) wereunaware of their infection."(http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/msm/index.htm).
- 25% of HIV infected in U.K. unaware of their infection: "Of theestimated 86,500 people living with HIV in the United Kingdom, about 25percent are not aware they are infected, the Health Protection Agency saidrecently." (The Body, thebody.com/content/art59714.html)
Clearly, the disease statistics related to a homosexuallifestyle prove that such a lifestyle is harmful not only to themselves butalso to others, especially when you note that in both the U.S. and U.K. largepercentages of HIV infected people don't know they are infected. This isa danger to society since it supports the spread of disease on a large scale.
Financial Impact
- $12.1 Billion annual cost in US: "Future treatment for the 40,000people infected with HIV in the United States every year will cost $12.1billion annually, a new study showed."(msnbc.msn.com/id/15528984/ns/health-aids/t/new-us-hiv-cases-cost-billion-year/)
- $1.5 Billion Cost for 2001 in Canada: "June 2001, Halifax, NovaScotia--HIV/AIDS cost Canadians more than $2 billion in 1999 in directand indirect costs. Health care costs accounted for about $560 million;prevention, research and supports to AIDS victims for about $40 million; andlost economic production due to premature death and disability for nearly $1.5billion." (gpiatlantic.org/releases/pr_cost_aids.htm)
The financial drain on society due to the medical costs of HIVis huge. The greater the impact, the more damage it does to the society'sfinancial stability.
Mental Health
How is the mental health of homosexuals and lesbians? Doesit have the same bell-curve as the rest of society? No, it doesnot. Take a look at these statistics and note that the mental healthissues are not due to social pressure and rejection by the majority of societywho considers homosexuality to be aberrant.
- " . . . homosexuals are about 50% more likely to sufferfrom depression and engage in substance abuse than the rest of the population,reports Health24.com . . . the risk of suicide jumped over 200% if anindividual had engaged in a homosexual lifestyle . . . the lifespan of ahomosexual is on average 24 years shorter than that of a heterosexual . . .While the Health 24 article suggested that homosexuals may be pushed tosubstance abuse and suicide because of anti-homosexual cultural and familypressures, empirical tests have shown that there is no difference inhomosexual health risk depending on the level of tolerance in a particularenvironment. Homosexuals in the United States and Denmark--the latter ofwhich is acknowledged to be highly tolerant of homosexuality--both die onaverage in their early 50's, or in their 40's if AIDS is the cause of death.The average age for all residents in either country ranges from themid-to-upper-70s." (onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.aspx?id=255614)
- 73% of the psychiatrists in the American Psychiatric Associationwho responded to a survey by Harold I. Lief said that they thought thathomosexual men are less happy than others. 70% percent said they believed that thehomosexuals' problems were due more to personal conflicts than to socialstigmatization. Study by Harold I. Lief, Sexual Survey Number 4: CurrentThinking on Homosexuality, Medical Aspects of Human Sexuality 2 (1977),pp.110-111 (Cited in Growing Up Straight by George A. Reker)."(exodusglobalalliance.org/ishomosexualityhealthyp60.php)
Sexual Molestation
- Higher sexual molestation with homosexual parents: “Adisproportionate percentage--29--percent--of the adult children of homosexualparents had been specifically subjected to sexual molestation by thathomosexual parent, compared to only 0.6 percent of adult children ofheterosexual parents having reported sexual relations with their parent. . . .Having a homosexual parent(s) appears to increase the risk of incest with aparent by a factor of about 50.” (P. Cameron and K. Cameron,"Homosexual Parents," Adolescence 31 (1996): 772" (exodusglobalalliance.org/ishomosexualityhealthyp60.php).
Certainly, no one wants children molested by adults. (Unfortunately, pedophilia is now being pushed as another 'sexual orientation'see http://www.greeleygazette.com/press/?p=11517). Society needs toprotect its children--not subject them to sexual pressures andmolestation. However, the homosexual lifestyle clearly presents anincreased threat to our children.
Sexual Promiscuity
Sexual promiscuity helps support the spread of disease. What are the promiscuity statistics of the homosexual community? Shockingly bad!
- 28% of homosexual men had more than 1000 partners: "Bell andWeinberg reported evidence of widespread sexual compulsion among homosexualmen. 83% of the homosexual men surveyed estimated they had had sex with 50or more partners in their lifetime, 43% estimated they had sex with 500 or morepartners; 28% with 1,000 or more partners. Bell and Weinberg p 308."(exodusglobalalliance.org/ishomosexualityhealthyp60.php)
- Low rate of sexual fidelity among homosexuals. "There isan extremely low rate of sexual fidelity among homosexual men as compared tomarried heterosexuals. Among married females 85% reported sexualfidelity. Among married men, 75.5% reported sexual fidelity. Among homosexualmales in their current relationship, 4.5% reported sexual fidelity. (Sources:Laumann, The Social Organization of Sexuality, 216; McWhirter and Mattison, TheMale Couple: How Relationships Develop (1984): 252-253; Wiederman,"Extramarital Sex," 170. This is extracted fromhttp://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=IS04C02)
Does anyone think that such mind-blowing promiscuity is healthyfor any society, especially when the homosexual community is particularly subjectto HIV infection? Homosexuals are members of society; and their behavior,which is a manifestation of their "orientation," is extremelydangerous.
Death of a society
If we produce no children, our society will die. Therewon't be enough people to support the infrastructure, medical needs, economicdevelopment, etc. That is a fact. So, common sense would tell usthat homosexuality is a danger to society since it cannot produce children tofurther the society.
Opening the door wide
Homosexuality is a behavior that is based, as many claim, on anorientation. What about other sexual orientations such as pedophilia,voyeurism, necrophilia, bestiality, polygamy, incest, exhibitionism, fetishes,frotterism, masochism, sadism, etc.? The arguments for and against theseother "orientations" are many, and we won't go into them here. But, who is to say that those who fall into these sexual categories won't usethe homosexual agenda's orientation argument as a basis to further their own causes? If you think this is a ridiculous idea, then you are not aware of the fact thatpedophiles are doing just that. See the article "Pedophiles want same rights as homosexuals." Muslimspractice polygamy, and they are increasing in America. Mormons havepracticed it in the past, and who is to say they won't get another revelationdeclaring that it is permissible again once the homosexual movement and itsredefinition of marriage is ingrained in society? Incest is sure tofollow (See the article "Rick Santorum was right about Incest and theSlippery Slope )." The slippery slope is exactly the issue. Once sexual morays are loosed, marriage definitions and fidelity are loosened,too. Nothing happens in a society by itself since their intertwiningsocial strings have collateral effects.
Conclusion
So, is homosexuality dangerous to society? The facts showthat it is. We have to ask, why then would it be promoted so heavily whenit is so harmful? The only answer I can come up with (aside from abiblical one) is that the politically correct don't care about the facts. Instead, they want their agenda promoted. They want their sexual freedomwithout responsibility. They, like so many tyrants in history, want toforce their minority opinion on the majority to satisfy their own appetites.

Most don't want their kids to be perverts.
Leave a comment: