Trump Praises North Korea's Kim as ‘Very Honorable’
The Trump of God?
Don't kid yourself - before it's all over Trump will convert Kim Jong Un into a Juchie Capitalist.
North Korea in no time will be selling Juchie refrigerators and other appliances at your local Home Depot, Chick-fil-A will be granted a franchise to feed North Korea's starving people, and Kim Jong Un's all girl Moranbong Band will be selling their songs on Apple iTunes, playing to sold out concerts at Carnegie Hall, and featured at Trump MAGA rallies.
Un will also be taking Bernie Sanders off our hands and will become the Ambassador to North Korea.
Hell's foundations quiver at the shout of praise; brothers, lift your voices, loud your anthems raise.
Originally posted by WilliamJenningsBryanView Post
Don't kid yourself - before it's all over Trump will convert Kim Jong Un into a Juchie Capitalist...
Maybe we can even look forward to the end of this "anime" fad? Naruto, Avatar the Last Airbender, and current millennial favorite, Family Guy, are all terrible influences on our youth. I pray our soon-to-be friendly status with Korea will bring blessings to both sides of the ocean.
Hello, my name is Mary. I hope to fellowship with you! That is, unless you don't listen to church authority (Deuteronomy 17:12); are a witch (Exodus 22:17); are a homosexual (Leviticus 20:13; Romans 1:24-32); or fortuneteller (Leviticus 20:27) or a snotty kid who hits their dad (Exodus 21:15); or curses their parents (Proverbs 20:20; Leviticus 20:9); an adulterer (Leviticus 20:10); a non-Christian (Exodus 22:19; Deuteronomy 13:7-12; Deuteronomy 17:2-5;Romans 1:24-32); an atheist (2 Chronicles 15:12-13); or false prophet (Zechariah 13:3); from the town of one who worships another, false god (Deuteronomy 13:13-19); were a non-virgin bride (Deuteronomy 22:20-21); or blasphemer (Leviticus 24:10-16), as God calls for your execution and will no doubt send you to Hell, and I have no interest developing a friendship with the Spiritually Walking Dead.
Maybe we can even look forward to the end of this "anime" fad? Naruto, Avatar the Last Airbender, and current millennial favorite, Family Guy, are all terrible influences on our youth. I pray our soon-to-be friendly status with Korea will bring blessings to both sides of the ocean.
Anime doesn't come from Korea, It comes from Japan.
But the thing is, most popular anime that gets attention here in the states comes from Japan, like Naruto. Not only that, but Avatar the Last Airbender and Family are produced here in America, which makes them not anime. I'm not trying to be a know-it-all here, I just don't want Mrs. Etherelda to get her hopes up for no reason.
But the thing is, most popular anime that gets attention here in the states comes from Japan, like Naruto. Not only that, but Avatar the Last Airbender and Family are produced here in America, which makes them not anime. I'm not trying to be a know-it-all here, I just don't want Mrs. Etherelda to get her hopes up for no reason.
Mrs. Jackson,
Your statement would indicate that you are, indeed, trying to be a know it all.
Proverbs 12:23 - A prudent man concealeth knowledge: but the heart of fools proclaimeth foolishness.
I understand that you have probably only been able to avail of an inner city education, but letting everyone see it is just foolishness.
Your statement would indicate that you are, indeed, trying to be a know it all.
Proverbs 12:23 - A prudent man concealeth knowledge: but the heart of fools proclaimeth foolishness.
I understand that you have probably only been able to avail of an inner city education, but letting everyone see it is just foolishness.
YIC
TT
I'm not a girl and I'm not married, so stop calling me Mrs. Jackson. My name is Anthony. To assume I've only been allowed an inner city education or to assume that I live in the inner city is racist. That verse would make sense to use in this context had I said anything that was incorrect.
I'm not a girl and I'm not married, so stop calling me Mrs. Jackson. My name is Anthony. To assume I've only been allowed an inner city education or to assume that I live in the inner city is racist. That verse would make sense to use in this context had I said anything that was incorrect.
Proverbs 12:23 - A prudent man concealeth knowledge: but the heart of fools proclaimeth foolishness.
Originally posted by anthonyijackson
That verse would make sense to use in this context had I said anything that was incorrect.
The Bible, which is very plain in its language, makes its meaning abundantly clear. Since it is the only source explaining the message of Salvation that clarity is essential. If it were not so people could go off thinking that homosexuals may be eligible or that worshipping large goblin statues was no barrier when in fact the opposite is true. Thus what you said in an earlier post is incorrect.
Originally Posted by anthonyijackson ..it's only a sin if a man looks upon a woman, and not if a man looks upon a man etc.
Originally Posted by God.
Leviticus 18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.
Leviticus 20:13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
The Bible, which is very plain in its language, makes its meaning abundantly clear. Since it is the only source explaining the message of Salvation that clarity is essential. If it were not so people could go off thinking that homosexuals may be eligible or that worshipping large goblin statues was no barrier when in fact the opposite is true. Thus what you said in an earlier post is incorrect.
I Corinthians 7:2 Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.
. . . . .and
Matthew 5:28 But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.
You had responded that
Both quotes specify only man and woman, so if we are going in literal terms the second quote is telling me that it's only a sin if a man looks upon a woman, and not if a man looks upon a man or a woman looks upon a woman with lust. I'm not sure if i got the point I have in mind across effectively but know that I tried my best.
The Bible does not teach that it's only a sin if a man looks upon a woman. For example in Deuteronomy it's made clear that bearing false witness against one's neighbour is also a sin and in Amos accepting bribes is presented, by God, as sinful too.
Amos 5:12 For I know your manifold transgressions and your mighty sins: they afflict the just, they take a bribe, and they turn aside the poor in the gate from their right.
Taking a verse stating that one thing is a sin, in your example a man coveting a woman, does not mean there are no other sins. Jesus was pointing out that the thought is the crime as much as the action. He was not saying that there are no other sins. My response was simply to quote the verses contradicting what you had suggested.
Homosexuals are commanded to be dealt with in very specific ways in The Bible. If you think God was wrong in that I guess you could say that God's definitions of sin were incorrect. But since sin is what God defines as sinful, you can't announce that something spelled out by God as a sin is not a sin. It's a sin because God has said so.
Homosexuality, idolatry, lust, bribery, perjury, all equally defined as sins. You were saying The Bible got it wrong. That means God got it wrong. If that's what you think why even bother with God at all?
Comment