[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Hello, I'm Bee your friendly Antitheist

Mr. Joe, I appreciate your kindness and I hope we can continue our friendly discourse and I can remain a "friend". I was raised in a Roman Catholic household, however through my own independent realization I found myself not engaging in any religion and subsequently I do not spend any of my time in any congregation in which preaches how I should live my own life.

Happily I am an ex-Catholic too. I rejoice you too escaped the trap of the manufactured, self-serving, pseudo-intellectual hogwash the Catholic Church peddles to justify its arrogant and exploitative behavior even if you have make the wrong choice of atheism.

Tell me what specifically awoke you to the Catholics not having the truth and caused you to turn your soul over to unbelief (as in Satan)?

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Hello, I'm Bee your friendly Antitheist

why cant science and religion integrate with each other?

Because science unreasonably refuses to accept The Bible as fact. If they did that there would be no culture war at all.

[Professor Bessemer]

Re: Hello, I'm Bee your friendly Antitheist

Professor, I am glad to make your acquaintance. I sir, am a happily married male. (Married to a beautiful woman) I am not a homosexual in any manner, nor have I ever been. I am curious about you're title of professor, if you don't mind me asking, is this a true title given from a credentialed institution of higher learning or a self given title?

I am glad to finally get your gender straight. If you had been female, I would have prepared myself for the violent mood swings, the inability to listen to reason, and the mental delicateness that is typical of the fairer sex. And even though you are an admitted hater of our Lord, at least you are a heterosexual male and therefore may be capable of understanding what I am trying to say.

Also, if you would just click on my profile, you will see my qualifications. I am sure someone who claims to be as intelligent and as curious as you do would not want me to spoon feed you information that you could so easily find with just a few clicks of your mouse.

[beewill]

Re: Hello, I'm Bee your friendly Antitheist

They can, but where they have failed through history is when science contradicts the teachings held dear to the religious amongst our world. There are countless examples of scientific laws that have been challenged by the religious from the basis of their beliefs and rather than to have a debate, they label them as blasphemy and attempt to punish those who are against them. I am guessing this could be in the Professors wheelhouse.

[Flatty10]

Re: Hello, I'm Bee your friendly Antitheist

Simple. God is the truth. Science is heathen lies.

how is science heathen lies?

If God being rational, created rational human beings, surely there is a rational way to explain the rational world around us?

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Hello, I'm Bee your friendly Antitheist

They can, but where they have failed through history is when science contradicts the teachings held dear to the religious amongst our world. There are countless examples of scientific laws that have been challenged by the religious from the basis of their beliefs and rather than to have a debate, they label them as blasphemy and attempt to punish those who are against them. I am guessing this could be in the Professors wheelhouse.

You have to be logical here; God is perfect, man is imperfect. Therefore logically when man contradicts God, like with heliocentricism and the round earth, man is clearly wrong no matter what "facts" he may present.

[Teru mikami]

Re: Hello, I'm Bee your friendly Antitheist

how is science heathen lies?

If God being rational, created rational human beings, surely there is a rational way to explain the rational world around us?

So you are acknowledging God now?

Better, but you're still on your way to Hell.

[Flatty10]

Re: Hello, I'm Bee your friendly Antitheist

You have to be logical here; God is perfect, man is imperfect. Therefore logically when man contradicts God, like with heliocentricism and the round earth, man is clearly wrong no matter what "facts" he may present.

Yes God obviously is Perfect, God is truth. And yes man is imperfect, that doesn't mean he fails at speaking truth some of the time.

what would be some examples of scientific truths not theories that contradict the word of God?

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Hello, I'm Bee your friendly Antitheist

Yes God obviously is Perfect, God is truth. And yes man is imperfect, that doesn't mean he fails at speaking truth some of the time.

what would be some examples of scientific truths not theories that contradict the word of God?

Off the top of my head here are some of the errors of science

Heliocentric solar system
Old Earth
gravity
Evolution
Disease Theory
Magnetism
Round Earth
Stars are other suns
The brain is used for thinking and not the heart
Whales aren't fish
Bats aren't brids

[Flatty10]

Re: Hello, I'm Bee your friendly Antitheist

Off the top of my head here are some of the errors of science

Heliocentric solar system
Old Earth
gravity
Evolution
Disease Theory
Magnetism
Round Earth
Stars are other suns
The brain is used for thinking and not the heart
Whales aren't fish
Bats aren't brids

could you explain the error in each of these?

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Hello, I'm Bee your friendly Antitheist

They can, but where they have failed through history is when science contradicts the teachings held dear to the religious amongst our world. There are countless examples of scientific laws that have been challenged by the religious from the basis of their beliefs and rather than to have a debate, they label them as blasphemy and attempt to punish those who are against them. I am guessing this could be in the Professors wheelhouse.

If you'd like to find out more about Landover Baptist Church, please read THIS thread created especially for new posters.

If you have a question, use the "search" function before posting it. Most likely it is being discussed somewhere on this Godly forum. Please don't waste God's precious bandwidth.

You will keep a respectful tongue in your head whenever addressing your betters, which includes all True Christians™. Failure to do so, or any attempt at inciting debate or mockery of God's Divine Plan, can and will result in the suspension of your posting privileges.

Your rights on this forum are listed HERE. If you feel that any of these rights have been violated, please don't hesitate to contact a Pastor at once.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Hello, I'm Bee your friendly Antitheist

could you explain the error in each of these?

Considering these are discussed at length in the "Christians Science" subforum it would be far more appropriate for you to search for them yourself.

[beewill]

Re: Hello, I'm Bee your friendly Antitheist

Professor, I have looked into your credentials, I shall no longer refer to you with such a reverent term as Professor as you have not earned that privilege.

As far as science vs. the bible goes let’s start at the beginning; the bible says that the Earth was created before the sun. Science says that the sun came before the Earth. The bible says that the sun wasn’t created until the fourth day. Since a day is defined as the time between sunrises (or between sunrise and sunset), there is no logical basis on which to distinguish the first three days. Similarly, there is no basis for saying that there was a morning and an evening on each of these first three days of creation as the bible states. The bible also says that vegetation was created on the third day and the sun on the fourth as we all know with our sometime feeble attempts at gardening, plants need the sun to survive.

[Flatty10]

Re: Hello, I'm Bee your friendly Antitheist

Considering these are discussed at length in the "Christians Science" subforum it would be far more appropriate for you to search for them yourself.

yep cool, sorry didn't realize

[Professor Bessemer]

Re: Hello, I'm Bee your friendly Antitheist

Professor, I have looked into your credentials, I shall no longer refer to you with such a reverent term as Professor as you have not earned that privilege.

As far as science vs. the bible goes let’s start at the beginning; the bible says that the Earth was created before the sun. Science says that the sun came before the Earth. The bible says that the sun wasn’t created until the fourth day. Since a day is defined as the time between sunrises (or between sunrise and sunset), there is no logical basis on which to distinguish the first three days. Similarly, there is no basis for saying that there was a morning and an evening on each of these first three days of creation as the bible states. The bible also says that vegetation was created on the third day and the sun on the fourth as we all know with our sometime feeble attempts at gardening, plants need the sun to survive.

I will simply ignore the insult with which you opened your post, as I am a forgiving Christian man and I am often insulted by ignorant unsaved heathens such as yourself.

The simplest way to refute your argument is also the most accurate. The King James Bible is the inerrant word of our perfect and infallible God. Therefore, every word of said Bible is by definition true and correct.

Or to put it into terms that even a moronic heretic such as yourself can understand; because the Bible says so.