X
-
Re: Introduction
Am I twisting scripture? I'm just trying to understand history.
Dear ACatholic,
You have received an infraction at The Landover Baptist Church Forum.
Reason: Twisting Scripture to make it sound internally contradictory
-------
SHUT UP! SHUT UP! SHUT UP! You're trying to make God's Holy Word© seem just as made up as all those other religious books that ARE made up are!
-------
This infraction is worth 40 point(s) and may result in restricted access until it expires. Serious infractions will never expire.
Comment
-
Re: Introduction
The Apocrypha was accepted reading based on its historical value, though not accepted as Scripture by anyone outside of the Catholic church. The King James translators therefore placed it between the Old and New Testaments for its historical benefit to its readers. They did not integrate it into the Old Testament text as do the corrupt Alexandrian manuscripts.Originally posted by ACatholic View PostI don't want to twist scripture. To the extent I did so I apologize. Please forgive me. I just want to know what the scriptures are. Is it the Bible that King James published in 1611, or the KJV that is on your desk?
That they rejected the Apocrypha as divine is very obvious by the seven reasons which they gave for not incorporating it into the text. They are as follows:
1. Not one of them is in the Hebrew language, which was alone used by the inspired historians and poets of the Old Testament.
2. Not one of the writers lays any claim to inspiration.
3. These books were never acknowledged as sacred Scriptures by the Jewish Church, and therefore were never sanctioned by our Lord.
4. They were not allowed a place among the sacred books, during the first four centuries of the Christian Church.
5. They contain fabulous statements, and statements which contradict not only the canonical Scriptures, but themselves; as when, in the two Books of Maccabees, Antiochus Epiphanes is made to die three different deaths in as many different places.
6. It inculcates doctrines at variance with the Bible, such as prayers for the dead and sinless perfection.
7. It teaches immoral practices, such as lying, suicide, assassination and magical incantation.
A little education goes a long way, my friend.
Hello, my name is Mary. I hope to fellowship with you! That is, unless you don't listen to church authority (Deuteronomy 17:12); are a witch (Exodus 22:17); are a homosexual (Leviticus 20:13; Romans 1:24-32); or fortuneteller (Leviticus 20:27) or a snotty kid who hits their dad (Exodus 21:15); or curses their parents (Proverbs 20:20; Leviticus 20:9); an adulterer (Leviticus 20:10); a non-Christian (Exodus 22:19; Deuteronomy 13:7-12; Deuteronomy 17:2-5;Romans 1:24-32); an atheist (2 Chronicles 15:12-13); or false prophet (Zechariah 13:3); from the town of one who worships another, false god (Deuteronomy 13:13-19); were a non-virgin bride (Deuteronomy 22:20-21); or blasphemer (Leviticus 24:10-16), as God calls for your execution and will no doubt send you to Hell, and I have no interest developing a friendship with the Spiritually Walking Dead.

Comment
-
Re: Introduction
Listen friend, I am beginning to believe that your feigned obsession with the Apocrypha is little more than a straw man that you are using to torment certain members of our Holy church. As anyone with any knowledge of theology could tell you, the Apocrypha were never considered canonical by anyone other than Catholic and Orthodox heretics.Originally posted by ACatholic View PostI don't want to twist scripture. To the extent I did so I apologize. Please forgive me. I just want to know what the scriptures are. Is it the Bible that King James published in 1611, or the KJV that is on your desk?
They were placed between the Testaments and considered to be the writings of "Godly men", nothing more. By your twisted logic, copywrite dates and notations, footnotes, and publshing information about the fonts and layouts used would just as valuable as scripture. The fact that some rebellious scribes included these writings in some early versions of the One True Bible is of little consequence to saved True Christians™.Professor of Creation Science and Flood Geology at Landover Baptist University
sigpic
Sodomites! Stop being gay TODAY!
Wherefore lay apart all filthiness and superfluity of naughtiness, and receive with meekness the engrafted word, which is able to save your souls. James 1:21
Comment
-
Re: Introduction
Why would there need to be scripture that said that? The KJV 1611 is the revealed Word of Almighty God. God has spoken to others over the millennia, why do you seek to illegitimize all the rest of the Lord's work since 1611?Originally posted by ACatholic View PostNow those arguments make a lot on sense. Where in the Bible does it say that only the KJV1611 is the word of God?Professor of Creation Science and Flood Geology at Landover Baptist University
sigpic
Sodomites! Stop being gay TODAY!
Wherefore lay apart all filthiness and superfluity of naughtiness, and receive with meekness the engrafted word, which is able to save your souls. James 1:21
Comment
-
Re: Introduction
The question is: Why is the KJV the only version? You say that God has spoken in many times and in many places and I agree with you. But I got an infraction for quoting the RSV. I didn't even quote the RSV. I quoted someone who quoted the RSV. Why is the KJV the only version? Do you all believe that God miracled the KJV into the hands of King James? Or is it more complicated than that?
Comment
-
Re: Introduction
The King James Bible is the pure form of the Word of God. All other Bible versions are watered down versions that have been interpreted by sinners to make the hard truths of scripture easier to swallow for false Christians who are not resolute enough to be truly saved.Originally posted by ACatholic View PostThe question is: Why is the KJV the only version? You say that God has spoken in many times and in many places and I agree with you. But I got an infraction for quoting the RSV. I didn't even quote the RSV. I quoted someone who quoted the RSV. Why is the KJV the only version? Do you all believe that God miracled the KJV into the hands of King James? Or is it more complicated than that?
Living by every single word of the KJV is not easy. When I was a practicing homosexual, I delighted in breaking as many of His laws as I could. But now, as a saved heterosexual, I glorify God every single minute of every day by following God's Law as stated in His Bible.Professor of Creation Science and Flood Geology at Landover Baptist University
sigpic
Sodomites! Stop being gay TODAY!
Wherefore lay apart all filthiness and superfluity of naughtiness, and receive with meekness the engrafted word, which is able to save your souls. James 1:21
Comment
-
Re: Introduction
"Search" function is your friend.Originally posted by ACatholic View PostThe question is: Why is the KJV the only version?...
Seven easy ways to tell the True Bible from the false ones http://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=10335

Comment
-
Re: Introduction
HereOriginally posted by ACatholic View PostThe question is: Why is the KJV the only version? You say that God has spoken in many times and in many places and I agree with you. But I got an infraction for quoting the RSV. I didn't even quote the RSV. I quoted someone who quoted the RSV. Why is the KJV the only version? Do you all believe that God miracled the KJV into the hands of King James? Or is it more complicated than that?
Read articles on many different topics like Bible versions, Catholicism, Evolution, Islam, Evangelism, Israel, Jehovah's Witnesses, Masonry and Mormonism.
Happy Reading.PROOF: Atheists are too stupid to understand the Bible!
Proverbs 13:24(KJV): "He that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes."
Galatians 4:16 Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?
Comment
-
Re: Introduction
I was a Catholic, but Jesus showed me the error of my ways when the Catholic Church elected a NAZI as a pope.
Thank you Jesus.
Amen.I Samuel 20:4
"Then said Jonathan unto David, Whatsoever thy soul desireth, I will even do it for thee."
This is not a reference of a homosexual relationship but a friendship of depth and platonic commitment! Why must liiebrals always make everything sound so DIRTY!?
Comment
-
Re: Introduction
Aaron had to go fly on his plane somewhere, but he told me to tell you that you better stop worrying so much about us, since we're saved already. He said you needed to shut up and listen instead of asking so many stupid questions, or God was going to send you to Hell pretty soon.Originally posted by ACatholic View PostThe question is: Why is the KJV the only version? You say that God has spoken in many times and in many places and I agree with you. But I got an infraction for quoting the RSV. I didn't even quote the RSV. I quoted someone who quoted the RSV. Why is the KJV the only version? Do you all believe that God miracled the KJV into the hands of King James? Or is it more complicated than that?
He said you make even me look smart, and I sometimes get lost on the way back from the bathroom. (I really don't, but Aaron said I had to say that here on the forum, and I guess I am pretty stupid and clumsy anyway).
Also, stop making Aaron mad, it just makes it tougher for me to do good and not get in trouble.
YIC
Mrs. Aaron PortwayAaron said I should have this for my signature to remind me how to be a good wife.
"Feminism is a socialist, anti-family, political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians."
Pat Robertson
Comment
-
Re: Introduction
Sounds good, but then where did Jesus ever authorize...Originally posted by ACatholic View PostHi y'all,
I was born and raised Presbyterian. After years of study, prayer and reflection, I became Catholic last year.
I did this because Truth is not found in the traditions of men, but in a person:
In my desire to follow Jesus where ever he leads, I could not ignore what he said to Peter:
All Saints Day
Rosaries
The Worship and Adoration of Images
Indulgences
Purgatory
Immaculate Conception
Veneration of Saints
Counting of Beads
Transubstantiation
Confessionals
Fish on Fridays
The Worship of Mary
The Ascension of Mary
7 Sacraments
Celibacy
Papal Succession
Papal Infallibility
...and A THOUSAND OTHER THINGS. I ask to try to justify any of these with God's Word. I will try not to laugh too hard in return.
Because unlike catlick satanists, we can back up our claims with the Bible.
Pastor Ed

Comment

Comment