[Thomas Taylor]

Re: Introduction

I mean that the KJV 1611 has the apocrypha in it and your KJV does not have it. Whose Bible is inspired?

Ok, my litle butt munching Papist friend

My copy of the KJV 1611, which was printed in 1642 by the way, has the Apocrypha sandwiched between the OT and the NT.

If you take the time to actually read the foreword and introductory notes, you know the pages right after you open the cover, you will see that the books of the Apocrypha while written by Godly men were not, in fact, inspired by God.

These books, while still a valuable source of history, are not considered to be part of the cannon.

Think of them, rather, as something like an encyclopedia of Biblical times.

[Dr Laurence Niles]

Re: Introduction

I am pretty stupid and clumsy anyway.

Yes. Yes you are. I don't know how the good Captain puts up with you and that 'thing'.

YIC

[Dr Laurence Niles]

Re: Introduction

Sounds good, but then where did Jesus ever authorize...

All Saints Day
Rosaries
The Worship and Adoration of Images
Indulgences
Purgatory
Immaculate Conception
Veneration of Saints
Counting of Beads
Transubstantiation
Confessionals
Fish on Fridays
The Worship of Mary
The Ascension of Mary
7 Sacraments
Celibacy
Papal Succession
Papal Infallibility

...and A THOUSAND OTHER THINGS.

You forgot paedophillia.

YIC

[Redeemed Papist]

Re: Introduction

Your probably right. We shouldn't follow men even if they claim to follow Christ. That means that King James and whatever he said the word of God was is lying. Does that mean your pastor is lying too? Who is inspired? King James or you?

Now I know you're trolling.

I'm so glad I broke free of that death cult and follow Jesus. You mock the poor souls still ensnared by people lying when they say they know the mind of God.

I'll pray for you.