Tweet
Deuteronomy 22:5 The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God.
The United Kingdom has changed a lot since the days of our forefathers. In those days as the land bore sons who would take Jesus’ Word to its homeland of the USA, you couldn’t spell “Kingdom” without “g-o-d.”
Then there was mad King George; then the lunatics took over the asylum!
Read this and weep for a country that could have been a Theocracy, but which God has destroyed!
Transsexual still married to wife claims human rights breach after being denied pension at 60
Don’t hold your breath on this one True Christians™; I suspect the judgement of those be-wigged minions of Satan will be that this sort of thing should be encouraged!
The United Kingdom has changed a lot since the days of our forefathers. In those days as the land bore sons who would take Jesus’ Word to its homeland of the USA, you couldn’t spell “Kingdom” without “g-o-d.”
Then there was mad King George; then the lunatics took over the asylum!
Read this and weep for a country that could have been a Theocracy, but which God has destroyed!
Transsexual still married to wife claims human rights breach after being denied pension at 60
A transsexual claims his human rights have been breached because the law will not recognise him as a woman unless he divorces his wife.
Christopher Timbrell, who has changed his name to Christine, [edit: Surely he was christened with that name and needs God’s permission to change it?] has launched a High Court fight because his marital status bars him from claiming a pension from the age of 60 like other women. [edit: “like other women? HE IS NOT ‘LIKE’ OTHER WOMEN!”]
Instead Mr Timbrell, now 68, has only been entitled to claim a pension from the age of 65, like men. [edit: HE IS NOT ‘LIKE’ OTHER MEN EITHER!]
The father of two wants to be formally acknowledged as a woman, without needing to get divorced, and is asking for five years' worth of backdated pension payments from the Department for Work and Pensions. [edit: now we see the vile sin: he dresses like a woman for money! The sign of the harlot since time began!]
The retired chartered accountant had a sex change aged 59 but chose to remain married to his wife, Joy.
Churchgoing Mr Timbrell, from Sutton Coldfield, has gone to London's Civil Appeal Court claiming he has fallen foul of the Gender Recognition Act, which came into force in 2005.
This states that a man who has undergone gender reassignment cannot legally become female while still married to a woman - as one woman cannot be married to another.
The couple could end their marriage of 43 years and undergo a civil partnership but, as devoted Christians, they say divorce is against their religion. [edit: this is unbelievable! Dressing as a woman is a sin too! Two wrongs do NOT make a right!]
If Mr Timbrell wins it could pave the way for scores of other transsexuals who remain married to their wives to get legal recognition as women.
Yesterday, Lords Justice Thorpe, Moore-Bick and Aikens heard that Mr Timbrell had known since childhood that he was 'different'.
When he retired, he said the discomfort of being a woman in a man's body grew 'unbearable' and he broke the news to his wife before having surgery in 2000.
Mr Timbrell, who has two grown-up children and two grandchildren with his wife, told the court of his 'extreme distress' at his current dilemma.
He said: 'The Government's response to my claim for a retirement pension is that I am a man; I am not. It is humiliating that the Government will not recognise this.
'Joy and I feel strongly that we do not want a divorce. We love each other and are committed to each other.'
He added: 'Divorce runs counter to both my and Joy's religious convictions. [edit: their religious conviction seems to be limited to what is convenient and profitable!] We both discussed the matter with our vicar, and he agreed with us that it would be hypocritical and probably invalid in the eyes of the Church were we to end a marriage that neither of us wished to end.' [edit: And that’s the advice of the Church of England? Pass the sickbag, Mrs Bathfire.]
He said he felt a civil partnership would not be 'appropriate', explaining: 'They provide a means for homosexual couples to formalise their relationship. But we are not homosexual.'[edit: NO? Is he/she sure? Then they must be lezbeans!]
Jeremy Johnson, for the DWP, said he recognised the 'harsh choice' Mr Timbrell faced, but said it would be 'preferential treatment' for the couple both to draw pensions aged 60, compared with a mixed-gender married couple.
The three Appeal Court judges reserved their decision until a later date after yesterday's half-day hearing.
Instead Mr Timbrell, now 68, has only been entitled to claim a pension from the age of 65, like men. [edit: HE IS NOT ‘LIKE’ OTHER MEN EITHER!]
The father of two wants to be formally acknowledged as a woman, without needing to get divorced, and is asking for five years' worth of backdated pension payments from the Department for Work and Pensions. [edit: now we see the vile sin: he dresses like a woman for money! The sign of the harlot since time began!]
The retired chartered accountant had a sex change aged 59 but chose to remain married to his wife, Joy.
Churchgoing Mr Timbrell, from Sutton Coldfield, has gone to London's Civil Appeal Court claiming he has fallen foul of the Gender Recognition Act, which came into force in 2005.
This states that a man who has undergone gender reassignment cannot legally become female while still married to a woman - as one woman cannot be married to another.
The couple could end their marriage of 43 years and undergo a civil partnership but, as devoted Christians, they say divorce is against their religion. [edit: this is unbelievable! Dressing as a woman is a sin too! Two wrongs do NOT make a right!]
If Mr Timbrell wins it could pave the way for scores of other transsexuals who remain married to their wives to get legal recognition as women.
Yesterday, Lords Justice Thorpe, Moore-Bick and Aikens heard that Mr Timbrell had known since childhood that he was 'different'.
When he retired, he said the discomfort of being a woman in a man's body grew 'unbearable' and he broke the news to his wife before having surgery in 2000.
Mr Timbrell, who has two grown-up children and two grandchildren with his wife, told the court of his 'extreme distress' at his current dilemma.
He said: 'The Government's response to my claim for a retirement pension is that I am a man; I am not. It is humiliating that the Government will not recognise this.
'Joy and I feel strongly that we do not want a divorce. We love each other and are committed to each other.'
He added: 'Divorce runs counter to both my and Joy's religious convictions. [edit: their religious conviction seems to be limited to what is convenient and profitable!] We both discussed the matter with our vicar, and he agreed with us that it would be hypocritical and probably invalid in the eyes of the Church were we to end a marriage that neither of us wished to end.' [edit: And that’s the advice of the Church of England? Pass the sickbag, Mrs Bathfire.]
He said he felt a civil partnership would not be 'appropriate', explaining: 'They provide a means for homosexual couples to formalise their relationship. But we are not homosexual.'[edit: NO? Is he/she sure? Then they must be lezbeans!]
Jeremy Johnson, for the DWP, said he recognised the 'harsh choice' Mr Timbrell faced, but said it would be 'preferential treatment' for the couple both to draw pensions aged 60, compared with a mixed-gender married couple.
The three Appeal Court judges reserved their decision until a later date after yesterday's half-day hearing.
i thawt that when menfolk have a operashun to cut thier tallywhackers off, it woulds saves money, it would not cost nothin cuz you not be gettings stuff addeds to your body, 
unless he need the money cuz he brawt a pare of boobies, 
Comment