I'm thinking that maybe posting images of a strong and handsome Jesus is not such a good idea while in the presence of homosexuals whom you are trying to make straight (not that I think that forcing gays to be straight is a good idea, but I think you're defeating yourself with those pictures). I'm pretty sure that a gay guy is going to be just as (physically) attracted to a manly Jesus who radiates testosterone as he would an effeminate Jesus. What I think you Landoverites ought to do is create two sub-forums, one for gay men and one for gay women. You should post your "Manly Jesus" pictures in the lesbians' forum to try to "turn them straight for Jesus" by using those pictures, and then post pictures of really hot (but Christian) ladies in the men's forum for the same purpose.
Once again, I do not think there is anything wrong with homosexuality (or bisexuality, or transgendered persons, or transvestites), I just can't help but notice the flaw in your use of manly pictures of Jesus to make gay men straight. In fact I think those pictures would make your "Un-Gay" Christians go back to being gay. I know you're trying to show them what a "real man" looks like, but I'm thinking that you should maybe get them to focus less on what men look like, and more on what women look like.
But this is just a thought from Alie, the decision is, of course, up to the Admins and Mods.
Once again, I do not think there is anything wrong with homosexuality (or bisexuality, or transgendered persons, or transvestites), I just can't help but notice the flaw in your use of manly pictures of Jesus to make gay men straight. In fact I think those pictures would make your "Un-Gay" Christians go back to being gay. I know you're trying to show them what a "real man" looks like, but I'm thinking that you should maybe get them to focus less on what men look like, and more on what women look like.
But this is just a thought from Alie, the decision is, of course, up to the Admins and Mods.
Have A Nice Day
Comment