Bill O'Reilly, scientist

[WWJDnow]

Bill O'Reilly trounces modern science with impeccable logic:

I think Bill may be the brightest person on the planet who isn't a Landover Baptist Church pastor. This video should be required viewing for every science student in America.

[idioticyoungfool]

Re: Bill O'Reilly, scientist

Bill O'Reilly trounces modern science with impeccable logic:

I think Bill may be the brightest person on the planet who isn't a Landover Baptist Church pastor. This video should be required viewing for every science student in America.

Bill O'Reilly sitting in a chair repeatedly asking for someone to explain to him how the moon was created does not make him intelligent "he cant explain it therefore it must be God" was his argument, which is incredibly weak.

On the other hand, if he'd simply pointed to a Bible and said "this says God is real" then the debate would've been over in a matter of seconds

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: Bill O'Reilly, scientist

That is a beautifully reasoned response, to what was after all a pretty stupid question. Thank you for posting it.

[TheLordSavedMe]

Re: Bill O'Reilly, scientist

Bill O'Reilly trounces modern science with impeccable logic:

I think Bill may be the brightest person on the planet who isn't a Landover Baptist Church pastor. This video should be required viewing for every science student in America.

I know, right?

I like how he just keeps saying the same thing over and over again! Why not say something alot of times if it's totally TRUE!!!

It's like DUH, of course God made Mars! Only a complete dumdum would think God made the Earth and somebody else made Mars!

And that's why Mars doesn't have a moon like we do!






Tammi

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Bill O'Reilly, scientist

Bill O'Reilly sitting in a chair repeatedly asking for someone to explain to him how the moon was created does not make him intelligent "he cant explain it therefore it must be God" was his argument, which is incredibly weak.

On the other hand, if he'd simply pointed to a Bible and said "this says God is real" then the debate would've been over in a matter of seconds

Secularists always demand extra Biblical proof for God's existence. Mr O'Rielly just did that; science has no agreement on how the moon was created, therefor God must have done it. I think it is high time for all secularists to become Christians.

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: Bill O'Reilly, scientist

It's like DUH, of course God made Mars! Only a complete dumdum would think God made the Earth and somebody else made Mars!

I've watched this a couple of times - but still can't quite "get" the question.

_________________________

@wisseoldswami I don't think "David of Beverly Hills FL" would understand The Bible.

[Billy Bob Jenkins]

Re: Bill O'Reilly, scientist

The rhetorical gifts that Mr. O'Reilly possesses are evidence that he has been chosen by God to tell the Truth©1611. Where else would someone get such a gift of intelligence but from God?

Edit: I especially like how Bill ignores the stupid question "how did God get there then?" Obviously that question is invalid because God is defined as existing beyond time and space. So He is the only thing in the universe that can exist without a cause. Since the Flying Spaghetti Monster is not in the KJV Bible, he cannot exist outside of time and space like God does.

[Jet O'Niell]

Re: Bill O'Reilly, scientist

That video was too true. And I agree that it should be a required viewing for every science student on Earth. They should see it at least 3 times a year, every year. I wish I could go right up to Bill O'Reilly and shake his hand and say "You sir, speak truth and only truth" Then kindly direct him to this forum, where he can spread his enlightenment further to us and all the unsaved trash that briefly visit this forum. May God bless.

[Nobar King]

Re: Bill O'Reilly, scientist

Look: I know a few things about science, too. I'M A SCIENTIST!!!

[J.C.Maxwell]

Re: Bill O'Reilly, scientist

Not to say anything of Mr. O'Reilly's conclusion, but this entire video he is using a logical fallacy called an argument from ignorance. I just wish he used better logic to defend the faith.

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Re: Bill O'Reilly, scientist

I've watched this a couple of times - but still can't quite "get" the question.

_________________________

@wisseoldswami I don't think "David of Beverly Hills FL" would understand The Bible.

That's the brilliance of O'Reilly manifesting itself. He could have literally destroyed this pinhead using just the "science" he doesn't understand (the moon doesn't "pull" on the oceans – "gravity" postulates that masses attract, so the oceans exert a force on the moon as well). Einstein says that gravitation is a consequence of the curvature of spacetime. It takes the insightfulness of an O'Reilly to cut through the nonsense. It doesn't matter what your "explanation" is, it all started with God anyway.

[recent_convert]

Re: Bill O'Reilly, scientist

Having watched the video, I believe it can be summed up as follows:

Mr O'Reilly gets asked how to explain the tides in relation to the Biblical Creation theory. (can only assume what the question is as its not stated)
His response is where did it come from, and asks why Mars doesn't have one.
- Mars has 2 moons - Phobos and Deimos
He then goes on about where did we come from and why there isn't there any life on any other planet
- there is some evidence that Mars did once support bacteriological life form
- absence of proof is not proof of absence
Goes on to say more faith is required to not believe in God than to believe
- which is why scientists ask questions, work out possibilities then test, and test, and test....

In conclusion, he doesn't have the imagination to believe that in a massively gargantuan universe, life couldn't exist without a guiding hand/creator. Look at the sky on a clear night away from a town and look at the stars. In all of those, don't you think that life may have happened by chance here?
Its a possibility, which means it could happen, which means that in a large enough area across a large enough amount of time anything could happen. Such as the diversity of life we see on our planet.

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: Bill O'Reilly, scientist

Having watched the video, I believe it can be summed up as follows:

Mr O'Reilly gets asked how to explain the tides in relation to the Biblical Creation theory. (can only assume what the question is as its not stated)
His response is where did it come from, and asks why Mars doesn't have one.
- Mars has 2 moons - Phobos and Deimos
He then goes on about where did we come from and why there isn't there any life on any other planet
- there is some evidence that Mars did once support bacteriological life form
- absence of proof is not proof of absence
Goes on to say more faith is required to not believe in God than to believe
- which is why scientists ask questions, work out possibilities then test, and test, and test....

In conclusion, he doesn't have the imagination to believe that in a massively gargantuan universe, life couldn't exist without a guiding hand/creator. Look at the sky on a clear night away from a town and look at the stars. In all of those, don't you think that life may have happened by chance here?
Its a possibility, which means it could happen, which means that in a large enough area across a large enough amount of time anything could happen. Such as the diversity of life we see on our planet.

The question appears to be stated here @ 13 seconds:


When considering God's Word, about creation in Genesis, the sky and everything attached to it (such as Mars, for example) in Job or Joshua or Kings or Matthew Mark & Revelation, the benefits of incinerating live women in Jeremiah - in short all the evidence of God's Perfect Love and information FROM HIM about His Creation - there is not much of a rôle for imagination! Perhaps when people are telling stories to children or designing a washing machine or something imagination might be useful, but in asserting that life could arise by happenstance in a gargantuan universe there is nothing for us to understand beyond the certainty that Satan can and does rape the minds of men to vaunt his vainglorious nature and glorify his barbaric name. Secular FALSE SCIENCE epitomises that futile endeavour.

[Booger]

Re: Bill O'Reilly, scientist

Yea but still, Mars has 2 moons, how dumb is bill o'reilly? That right there should give you a hint on how dumb and pointless his argument is.

[Mars Survivor]

Re: Bill O'Reilly, scientist

Bill O'Reilly trounces modern science with impeccable logic:

I think Bill may be the brightest person on the planet who isn't a Landover Baptist Church pastor. This video should be required viewing for every science student in America.

Yes, I agree. This video should be viewed by every science student in America, then they can realise how more stupid Bill O' Reilly is, and hopefully we can make this YouTube video get even more dislikes than it has now. We have a very full understanding of why the tides goes in and the tides go out, why live is here, and science is pilling on the evidence and understanding of the universe. We do have a good understanding of how the moon and our planets got here looking at the observations we have taken from other solar systems. We don't see a man in white clothing creating the planets. It doesn't mean if you don't understand it, and us scientist don't understand it, does that mean God did it? Are you trying to postulate that when no one really understands it? In the past, there was a list of things which us scientist, at the time, didn't understand, thus you put the evidence on a supernatural things (God). Then, 100 years later we understand it making God a fading figure. Also want to correct what Bill said, Mars does have a moon, it has two in fact. I think you need to learn more science before moaning about what we do or do not understand.