The 1611 KJV & the Aprocropha

[empacae]

The 1611 KJV has the Apocropha. Are the passages included in the aprocropha valid?


I have many favorite passages, but this one serves me well at length.

Job 21: 14-16

Therefore they say unto God, Depart from us; for we desire not the knowledge of thy ways.

What is the Almighty, that we should serve him? and what profit should we have, if we pray unto him? Lo, their good is not in their hand: the counsel of the wicked is far from me.

emp

[Levi Jones]

Re: The 1611 KJV & the Aprocropha

They are free for all True Christians™ to study, but we don't consider them to be canonical at all.

They are full of strange superstition, unlike the rest of the Word.

Tobit 6:5-8, If the Devil, or an evil spirit troubles anyone, they can be driven away by making a smoke of the heart, liver, and gall of a fish...and the Devil will smell it, and flee away, and never come again anymore.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: The 1611 KJV & the Aprocropha

The 1611 KJV has the Apocropha. Are the passages included in the aprocropha valid?

No friend, that is a Satanic Papist lie that the Authorized KJV1611 has the Apocropha or ever had the Apocorpha. The Bible is not some random collection of books that people can add or subtract to at will.

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: The 1611 KJV & the Aprocropha

I can only assume that the Apocrypha was included in KJV1611 originally (but was left out at the next printing) because something was needed to have the Catlix bite and buy KJV and thus save their souls.

Once the world had been given the chance of Salvation in God’s Manual and Road Map to the Next Life, it was no longer needed, the truth being visible to all.

Clearly, the very worst of those Catlix, still clinging to their evil ways, now denounced a book without these folk tales and fables but by then it was too late for the pope and his Satanic minions – freedom had been won!

2Pe:1:16: For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: The 1611 KJV & the Aprocropha

I can only assume that the Apocrypha was included in KJV1611 originally (but was left out at the next printing) because something was needed to have the Catlix bite and buy KJV and thus save their souls.

What Brother Backfire said; one thing we can be sure it was the Hand of God(r) that removed the Aprocropha from the KJV1611 and tossed it into the trash were the Aprocropha belongs. It was positivity, absolutely NOT the a decision by the printers to save money and reduce weight so preachers didn't need to work so hard carrying The Bible around. The Aprocropha was written by Satan himself and no good and TRUE Christian should touch it.

<- Satan when you read the Aprocropha

[Meek and Humble]

Re: The 1611 KJV & the Aprocropha

I'm sorry, isn't it apocrypha?

[Nobar King]

Re: The 1611 KJV & the Aprocropha

Maybe he's using the afro version.

[Robert Jones]

Re: The 1611 KJV & the Aprocropha



It's there in the scanned version of the KJV1611 that's linked on this forum. I'm not sure what to make of that. Oh, this link explains it http://www.chick.com/reading/books/158/158_34.asp.

[repented harlot70]

Re: The 1611 KJV & the Aprocropha

The 1611 KJV has the Apocropha. Are the passages included in the aprocropha valid?


I have many favorite passages, but this one serves me well at length.

Job 21: 14-16

Therefore they say unto God, Depart from us; for we desire not the knowledge of thy ways.

What is the Almighty, that we should serve him? and what profit should we have, if we pray unto him? Lo, their good is not in their hand: the counsel of the wicked is far from me.

emp

No, it's not valid.