The most glaring gaps of the Darwinists fossil record.

[Bobby-Joe]

Even thought most harden rabid God hating atheist will admit The Bible talks about the world it’s human writers lived in and contains reasonable observation of it. The Bible is the only written source of many cultures and cities in the Middle East and the archeological evidence confirms the Biblical descriptions. The Bible’s description of the environment of ancient period Holy Land is accurate and beyond dispute.

The Bible recorded the existence of several creatures in The Middle East that are today extinct their like the Syrian Elephant and the desert lion; the dragon, the satyr, the unicorn and the behemoth. These animals lived and flourished in Bronze and Iron Age Palestine until dying out some time after the 1st AD. Even the Romans record these creatures with writers like Pitney the Elder.

Now if evolution is true like the secular scientists claim clearly these creatures would have a heritage extending back to that magical fish all land animals are supposed to come from. Darwinists brag about the abundance of human fossils. By there own “theory” of human origins human populations were small up until the agricultural revolution so logically there must be fossils for any common animal linage too over a similar period time. Yet go to a museum or Darwinist text book and you will see no fossils of these organism. Not one dragon, not one satyr, not one unicorn. For the “theory” of evolution to be true it has to be consistent for all animals at all times. You can not have a dragon magically appearing in 2500 BC just to frolic in the ruins of Babylon with and equally spontaneous satyr. That is not science.

You can not have it both ways Darwnists, were are the unicorn fossils?

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: The most glaring gaps of the Darwinists fossil record.

I’ve been thinking about fossils for some time, and your excellent article, above, crystallized my thoughts:

I note that no one is coming up with fossils from, say the 18th century – e.g. a fossilized injun or slave, etc.

Scientists, so-called, claim that all fossils are pre-Flood, or “antediluvian” as we Biblical Scholars say.

Has fossilization stopped suddenly? If so why? I have never heard a reasonable excuse as to why a fossil of, say a Longhorn hasn’t been found near Abilene.

Well, let’s look at who’s finding these fossils – scientists!

Where are they finding them? In the middle of nowhere!

Witnesses? None.

So the answer to your question as to why there are no unicorn fossils seems to be that so-called scientists, only produce fossils of things that they want us to believe existed.

Either they find them and suppress the findings or – and here my intuition becomes acute – they are producing these fossils in some factory in China.

You do a Google search for “Fossils China” – thousands of websites! You do a search for “plastic toys China” ” – thousands of websites! Need I say more?

[Brother Lazarus]

Re: The most glaring gaps of the Darwinists fossil record.

Brother Joe and Brother Bathfire, thank you for the posts. It's always been my belief that God put fossils in the earth when he created it just to allow Satan to tempt those who may not be faithful to God. Those God given temptations are everywhere.

People, don't let Satan win by falling for those temptations!

Yours in Christ
Brother Lazarus

[barneyhilliard]

Re: The most glaring gaps of the Darwinists fossil record.

"The Bible recorded the existence of several creatures in The Middle East that are today extinct their like the Syrian Elephant and the desert lion; the dragon, the satyr, the unicorn and the behemoth. These animals lived and flourished in Bronze and Iron Age Palestine until dying out some time after the 1st AD. Even the Romans record these creatures with writers like Pitney the Elder."


Brother, I have to respectfully disagree with your statement here. Unicorns, dragons, etc are not extinct. The Bible does not menition extinction (except for certain heathens like the Ammonites). We must conclude that in God's great creation, these animals still exist. However, so-called scientists are busy looking for "fossils" and other Darwinist "evidence" so that they can disprove Creation. We need to press our Republican leaders to suppress funding for these so-called scientists and start funding searches for unicorns.

[Max Bayes]

Re: The most glaring gaps of the Darwinists fossil record.

You'll find the answer simple, and that it stems from the core belief of Atheist belief. Atheists, for some silly reason, don't believe in the Lord. Thusly, when they see the Holy Book, they claim they see a "work of fiction". You will find that the same logic can be applied to unicorns, dragons and behemoths. When they see a dragon skeleton, they claim they see a "dinosaur".

As you will all agree, this is simply a laughably flawed sense of perception on behalf of the atheist. Dragons are well documented. The Chinese have them at their new years celebrations. The Welsh have one as their flag. Saint George killed one, and who is going to doubt a saint?

But has anyone ever seen a dinosaur?

Case concluded my friends.

[JennyD]

Re: The most glaring gaps of the Darwinists fossil record.

You'll find the answer simple, and that it stems from the core belief of Atheist belief. Atheists, for some silly reason, don't believe in the Lord. Thusly, when they see the Holy Book, they claim they see a "work of fiction". You will find that the same logic can be applied to unicorns, dragons and behemoths. When they see a dragon skeleton, they claim they see a "dinosaur".

As you will all agree, this is simply a laughably flawed sense of perception on behalf of the atheist. Dragons are well documented. The Chinese have them at their new years celebrations. The Welsh have one as their flag. Saint George killed one, and who is going to doubt a saint?

But has anyone ever seen a dinosaur?

Case concluded my friends.

Well said, Mr. Bayes!

Indeed, dragons = dinosaurs, and they were clearly walking about with humans!

[Pastor Nereu Gargalo]

Re: The most glaring gaps of the Darwinists fossil record.

As always, the truth is in the Bible.

Isaiah 27:1
In that day the LORD with his sore and great and strong sword shall punish leviathan the piercing serpent, even leviathan that crooked serpent; and he shall slay the dragon that is in the sea.


Surprised this was not pointed out. Everything is so simple when one uses the Bible.

PRAISE

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: The most glaring gaps of the Darwinists fossil record.

I would like to bump this up. Any rebuttal secularists?

[Max Bayes]

Re: The most glaring gaps of the Darwinists fossil record.

I believe no heathen can rebuke my 'scientifically' backed up claims that dinosaurs are, in fact, dragons. With Pastor Nereu's backing scripture, I believe not even the most ardent of non-believers can fail to see the folly of their ways.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: The most glaring gaps of the Darwinists fossil record.

Every Darwinista that I've ever met is a limp-wristed communist with no guts at all. They're all yellow.

[Virginia Day Templeton]

Re: The most glaring gaps of the Darwinists fossil record.

We've told the neo-Darwinianists a thousand times: just show us one crocoduck and we'll grant that your theory has some merit, in spite of being incontrovertibly false according to the Holy Bible. And each time they fail to deliver. Here are a few more transitional forms I'm still waiting to see:

• Purrangutan (cat-orangutan)
• Bearaffe (bear-giraffe)
• Octopup (dog-octopus)
• Snailephant (snail-elephant)
• Tigonfly (tiger-dragonfly)
• Shellican (clam-pelican)
• Bunion (rabbit-onion)

Got any fossils for us, scientists? Anyone? Buuuuuueller?

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: The most glaring gaps of the Darwinists fossil record.

If evolution is true, how come babies aren't born as monkeys, then turn into humans as they grow up?

[Nobar King]

Re: The most glaring gaps of the Darwinists fossil record.

Here are a few more transitional forms I'm still waiting to see:

• Purrangutan (cat-orangutan)
• Bearaffe (bear-giraffe)
• Octopup (dog-octopus)
• Snailephant (snail-elephant)
• Tigonfly (tiger-dragonfly)
• Shellican (clam-pelican)
• Bunion (rabbit-onion)

Got any fossils for us, scientists? Anyone? Buuuuuueller?

I hope you didn't have to wait too long, honey.

[Jeb Stuart Thurmond]

Re: The most glaring gaps of the Darwinists fossil record.

Let's not forget the missing link between fishes without legs and fishes with legs. Also, the missing link between fishes with legs and amphibians with legs. Where are they, you elitist hook-nosed know-it-alls?

[jennabenna]

Re: The most glaring gaps of the Darwinists fossil record.

I’ve been thinking about fossils for some time, and your excellent article, above, crystallized my thoughts:

I note that no one is coming up with fossils from, say the 18th century – e.g. a fossilized injun or slave, etc.

Scientists, so-called, claim that all fossils are pre-Flood, or “antediluvian” as we Biblical Scholars say.

Has fossilization stopped suddenly? If so why? I have never heard a reasonable excuse as to why a fossil of, say a Longhorn hasn’t been found near Abilene.

Well, let’s look at who’s finding these fossils – scientists!

Where are they finding them? In the middle of nowhere!

Witnesses? None.

So the answer to your question as to why there are no unicorn fossils seems to be that so-called scientists, only produce fossils of things that they want us to believe existed.

Either they find them and suppress the findings or – and here my intuition becomes acute – they are producing these fossils in some factory in China.

You do a Google search for “Fossils China” – thousands of websites! You do a search for “plastic toys China” ” – thousands of websites! Need I say more?

Fossilization, depending on conditions, can take anywhere from about ten years to several million. The trouble is, Ten year conditions are generally found only in labs of scientists who know what they're talking about. You, on the other hand, don't have the slightest idea what you're talking about.