[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

To which I ask, does it say: "OTHER GODS, WHO WERE SONS OF GOD"? NO, it doesn't, YOU are interpretating.

Let me ask you:
Do you recognise satan as having been an angel before being cast down?
Do you consider him a god? (You vile devil-worshipper!)

Ok, consider this. It says 'the sons of god found the daughters OF MEN beautiful, and took wives such as they chose. The daughters of men, clearly suggesting a difference. If you believe your deity to indeed me a deity would it not be logical that if a deity were to have sons they'd be divine as well?
And by the way, quit throwing red herrings into my original debate!

Why should He make it easy for us?
We doesn't you mean don't even deserve any mercy from Him.

We're talking about the idea of INTELLIGENT design, not your views on deserved mercy for your deity. The fact still stands that the male apparatus has room for improvement, and could hardly be called an intelligent design.

Intelligent Design? There's nothing intelligent about it. In fact, it's as wicked as evilutionism, but much more subtle and insidious. It's the Creation Science equivalent of those lieberal Agnostichristian parishes where Pastor Feelgood blesses the unions of sodomites while paraphrasing the NIV and thinking lustful thoughts about the mulatto boy seated in the front pew... and as True Christians™, we must not settle for it. The LORD does not believe in half measures.

I dare you to make less sense right there.

Easy slick Baby Eater;

man must fear God and know God will send man to hell if man disobeys God. Therefore man must have an idea of the kind of pain hell is. That is why God, in His infinite merciful love, placed a highly sensitive daddy bag on man and beset him with a spiteful, harpyish wife who is depravedly obsessed with the daddy sack, constantly trying to bite it off or otherwise attacking it. Women don't have such things because they have no souls anyway to send to hell. GLORY!old

Any more questions harlot?

See? Again you resort to 'because god said so'. Do you have any evidence to back you up? And no, the bible does not count. You don't, do you?

I am HIGHLYOFFENDED!

I innocetnly clicked this thread expecting lies from Mrs. Hellbound. I however, DID NOT expect to be sexually assulted!

There should be a warning on the title of this thread. When I read your words I was accousted by PORN! I pert near fainted! You could have KILLED me! I could have fainted, hit my head on the bookcase behind me and DIED!

You filthy witch! I am assigning you 100 infraction points for posting this utter filth and failing to warn innocents that they are about to read PORN!

This thread is not fit for any True Christian™ Lady to lay her innocent eyes upon.


Disgusted, Sister Thumper

Sister Thumper, we've been through this. You with your delicate temperament should really get that padding on your desk and all around for while you're on the internet. That'd save you a lot of bumps and bruises from every time you see the word.................................get ready................................here it is..............................................TE STICLE!!

I just read this question for the first time. When humans are born, their package is neatly tucked behind skin. Then so called doctors snip it off, unless you're a joo. Then they wait till you're 13 ot 14. Also... Men who roll around on the ground for two house after a minor blow to the gonads, are looking for symapthy. They want someone to kiss them and make them all better.

You could ask why they're not completely inside. I'd say it's because we'd not be men if they were.

That isn't what I meant. I was comparing to birds, which have a ...... rectractable package, so the goods only come out when they need to mate. As funny as the idea of human men doing that would be , it'd still be more convenient.

[Virginia Day Templeton]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

To iterate further, intelligent design is dangerous because it is deliberately nonspecific about the identity of the "designer" in question. Yes, the organisms with which we are forced to share our resources were created, but by whom, and for what purpose? Was the world made by Buddha, Mary, Satan, Oogaboogahar? ID doesn't say. We, of course, know that they were created by the Christian God of the Bible in order to serve man and thus in turn serve God Himself. But by refusing to specify the role of the One True God in His Creation, the IDers deny His absolute sovereignty and therefore Him altogether. It is an inherently pantheistic (Satanic) system.

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

I hate to break it to you, but intelligent design as presented to the school boards is basically creationism with an attempt to disguise it. Yes, intelligent design implies a neutral viewpoint, merely a look to a nameless designer, but it's pretty much biblical creationism.

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

I hate to break it to you, but intelligent design as presented to the school boards is basically creationism with an attempt to disguise it. Yes, intelligent design implies a neutral viewpoint, merely a look to a nameless designer, but it's pretty much biblical creationism.

Walk around any of the fine stores in Freehold and you will see we put no stock in "nameless designers". Gucci, Prada, God. All the best designers go by name! Our shoes have labels, our handbags have labels, our clothes have labels, and praise Jesus, our planet has a label! Not sure where to look? It's there in plain sight, the first page of the King James Bible! Praise!

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

See? Again you resort to 'because god said so'. Do you have any evidence to back you up? And no, the bible does not count. You don't, do you?

I didn't say that Rachael, read it again. "I said God gave men sensitive testacies so they would know what hell is like from getting kicked in the balls and fear it" You know I have a point harlot so that is why you ignored what I wrote

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: TESTICLES disprove intelligent design!

I didn't say that Rachael, read it again. "I said God gave men sensitive testacies so they would know what hell is like from getting kicked in the balls and fear it" You know I have a point harlot so that is why you ignored what I wrote

Nonsense, I merely summarized, dear Booby Joe.
You said:
'God gave men sensitive testacies (dammit, just say testicle!) so........'
Which is a way of saying 'because god did it', which could be further carried to the argument that all you creationists use, being 'it is that way because god desires it/says it should be.'

Yes, there's a slight variant, I do admit that, but ultimately it boils down to the same thing.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: TESTICLES disprove intelligent design!

Nonsense, I merely summarized, dear Booby Joe.
You said:
'God gave men sensitive testacies (dammit, just say testicle!) so........'
Which is a way of saying 'because god did it', which could be further carried to the argument that all you creationists use, being 'it is that way because god desires it/says it should be.'

Yes, there's a slight variant, I do admit that, but ultimately it boils down to the same thing.

Really well let us try explaining daddy sacks with your Monkey God Darwin Miss Helsinger; as you point out they are such a vulnerable organ, so important to the future of the species that evolution would be against it. No wedding tackle means no kiddies. Right? So evolution would favor guys with better defended love baskets. Eventually men would have something like an armadillo in between their legs leaving men impervious to attacks from beasts and women.

The only logical explanation for such an important, yet vulnerable organ is God's will.

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: TESTICLES disprove intelligent design!

I believe I already answered that, here:

http://landoverbaptist.net/showpost.php?p=37360&postcount=11

Why won't you say testicle? Sheesh, how old are you?

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: TESTICLES disprove intelligent design!

I believe I already answered that, here:

http://landoverbaptist.net/showpost.php?p=37360&postcount=11

Why won't you say testicle? Sheesh, how old are you?

Our love sausage is external because we men like to pollute ourselves? What kind of nonsense is that? Monkey spanking has nothing to do with having kiddies, in fact Christian scientist have prove that self touching lowers a man's fertility.

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: TESTICLES disprove intelligent design!

That isn't what I said. Quit twisting my words, that part was a joke. Did you read the part about species age and adaptation?

P.S. Is that ALL you ever think about? My word, BJ, is there even five minutes when you stop thinking about tallywhackers?

[SalvationSeeker]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

Ok, consider this. It says 'the sons of god found the daughters OF MEN beautiful, and took wives such as they chose. The daughters of men, clearly suggesting a difference. If you believe your deity to indeed me a deity would it not be logical that if a deity were to have sons they'd be divine as well?
And by the way, quit throwing red herrings into my original debate!

No, it says so because women are created FROM men (our ribs), but also, it uses man in the sense of "mankind" (ie humans.)
Try knowing the entire Bible before you come up with these silly ideas, you stupid little rib!
And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.
Genesis 2:22

Someone who is a "son of god" is one of these:
1. Directly created by God, without any human parts or human ovens (women) involved, such as angels.
2. Childed by God directly, inside a human oven, as was the case with Jesus. (Galatians 4:4)
3. One who is a son of God through adoption, such as we True Christians. (Galatians 4:5-6)

Even satan is.. WAS a "son of god" (ie an angel) before falling:

Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan came also among them.
Job 1:6

That's why I asked if you consider him a god, satan is no god, yet he too was a son of god.
Thus your silly argument fails miserably.

We're talking about the idea of INTELLIGENT design, not your views on deserved mercy for your deity. The fact still stands that the male apparatus has room for improvement, and could hardly be called an intelligent design.

We have to take into consideration WHY He designed us in a certain way..
Because as you well know, He is an INTELLIGENT designer, He doesn't believe in evilution or "survival of the fittest"..
Instead He designs as He sees fit!
You have no right to question His motives.

And Samuel told him every whit, and hid nothing from him.
And he said, It is the LORD: let him do what seemeth him good.
1 Samuel 3:18

Repent, harlot!

[Daisy Mae Johnson]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

This thread is plain DISGUSTING!

But while we are at it.........Have you ever noticed that elbow skin looks just like testicle (GOD forgive me for typing that) skin?

It just goes to show you how creative HE is. It's a little tougher and perhaps a little more elastic than regular skin because it protects importants parts.

Oh how I love HIM so!

GLORY!

Sister Thumper

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

What is this obsession you have with men's seed purses, Van Hellosatan? Don't you see enough of them at the orgies and sacrifices?

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

No, it says so because..... *snip*

If you want to debate the whole sons of god thing, why not make another thread? Or if you like, I will. But quit throwing red herrings in my original debate!

We have to take into consideration WHY He designed us in a certain way..
Because as you well know, He is an INTELLIGENT designer, He doesn't believe in evilution or "survival of the fittest"..
Instead He designs as He sees fit!
You have no right to question His motives.

And Samuel told him every whit, and hid nothing from him.
And he said, It is the LORD: let him do what seemeth him good.
1 Samuel 3:18

The point is that intelligent design implies INTELLIGENT design. Not obvious flaws. Face it, your average car is far better deisgned. To give you an idea, if you were to make a car of a similar design to a human man, the engine would be on the hood of the car. Stupid, no?

This thread is plain DISGUSTING!

And yet you somehow manage to find your way back into it.

But while we are at it.........Have you ever noticed that elbow skin looks just like testicle (GOD forgive me for typing that) skin?

And you accuse me of having a one-track mind!

[SalvationSeeker]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

The point is that intelligent design implies INTELLIGENT design. Not obvious flaws. Face it, your average car is far better deisgned. To give you an idea, if you were to make a car of a similar design to a human man, the engine would be on the hood of the car. Stupid, no?

No.
Intelligent design implies, and is defined as, a belief that all life has been DESIGNED by an INTELLIGENT DESIGNER.
We True Christians know this as a fact, laid out for all to read back in the year of 1611 in the Holy KJV1611 Bible.

And consider this:
God is so vastly intelligent that you cannot fathom why He designed things in a certain way.
Is that too impossible for you to imagine? Are you too vain?

And also, if evilution had been true, why aren't the gonads on the inside of the body?
It would make more evilutionary sense.
We've been over this countless times, and so far everything you've posted has only served to strengthen our holy case of creationism!
Praise Jesus for making His enemies (you!) work for His servants (us) like this!