Masculinity proves intelligent design!

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: Testicles help DISprove intelligent design!

Your bible makes no mention of your god having manly parts. Not a one. Show me even one such example where it talks about that particular 'holy trinity'.

Genesis 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness

It's right there at the beginning, Van Hopeless! You can't even get past the first chapter? God made man in His image. Men have thingies, ergo God has a thingie. D'uh!

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Testicles help DISprove intelligent design!

Could a Pastor please change the name of this thread? It's hard to read about Creation Science if we have to keep seeing this filth every time we sign on to the board!

It isn't my fault if you have a filthy mind and get all hot and bothered whenever you see the word 'testicle'.

Seeing as I'm here anyway, I have to say the answer is obvious. God created man in His image. God, being God, has His... you know what... on the outside because nothing can harm them! So when creating man in His image, He had to place... that stuff... on the outside, or man would no longer be in His image.
But He wouldn't want men to forget their place in the order of things (after God, before women), and even though the mess up in Eden was Eve's fault, Adam still took a bite so there must be a touch of punishment there too.
It's all so easy if you really think about it. But if you really thought about it, you'd be a True Christian™.

Your bible makes no mention of your god having testicles. Not a one. Show me even one such example where it talks about that particular 'holy trinity'. *snicker*

The answer to your latest imbecilic question is: Because that's the way God wants it! You feminazis just cannot accept that you are inferior, and so you flail about using some ridiculous circular logic to try and find flaws in God's plan. Well, I'm sorry to tell you (yet again) that you do not know more than God.

In other words, you have no idea, do you? It must surely be obvious even to you that such a thing does NOT illustrate intelligent design so instead you fall back on 'because god says so!'

Now run and fetch me a sandwich, girl. And make it snappy!

I forget how you like your sandwiches, Zeke. Extra raw squid, wasn't it?

How do you teach a child not to touch a hot stove? You slap his little hand so he knows not to do that.

How do you make sure a boy protects his wedding tackle? Make sure he knows in no uncertain terms that it's not something to let his buddies kick!

It isn't just kicking that hurts them though. According to every man I know, even the slightest bump causes pain, and the idea of kicking them invariably makes them shudder and their hands go there to shield that spot. The fact is, hairy scary and the two bald men are badly made up and easy to put out of commission. An intelligently designed gonad would be tough or tuckable!

*Edit, ok who changed the name of my thread????? It makes no sense this way!!! If you must be all school-girlish about the word 'testicle' at least change it back to 'gonads help disprove intelligent design!!!*

[OnYourKnees]

Re: Testicles help DISprove intelligent design!

If they were intelligently designed, they'd be able to function as well from inside, or if not, then they'd be tough so that a slight poke wouldn't cause pain and a strong enough kick, crippling pain.

If they need to be outside, how is it that they are so sensitive to pain and so vulnerable? If there was intelligent design, then human men would either have functional testicles that stay inside, or tough testicles outside.

How do you teach a child not to touch a hot stove? You slap his little hand so he knows not to do that.

How do you make sure a boy protects his wedding tackle? Make sure he knows in no uncertain terms that it's not something to let his buddies kick!

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Testicles help DISprove intelligent design!

The answer to your latest imbecilic question is:

Because that's the way God wants it!

You feminazis just cannot accept that you are inferior, and so you flail about using some ridiculous circular logic to try and find flaws in God's plan. Well, I'm sorry to tell you (yet again) that you do not know more than God.

Now run and fetch me a sandwich, girl. And make it snappy!

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: Testicles help DISprove intelligent design!

Could a Pastor please change the name of this thread? It's hard to read about Creation Science if we have to keep seeing this filth every time we sign on to the board!

Seeing as I'm here anyway, I have to say the answer is obvious. God created man in His image. God, being God, has His... you know what... on the outside because nothing can harm them! So when creating man in His image, He had to place... that stuff... on the outside, or man would no longer be in His image.
But He wouldn't want men to forget their place in the order of things (after God, before women), and even though the mess up in Eden was Eve's fault, Adam still took a bite so there must be a touch of punishment there too.
It's all so easy if you really think about it. But if you really thought about it, you'd be a True Christian™.

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Testicles help DISprove intelligent design!

If they were intelligently designed, they'd be able to function as well from inside, or if not, then they'd be tough so that a slight poke wouldn't cause pain and a strong enough kick, crippling pain.

If they need to be outside, how is it that they are so sensitive to pain and so vulnerable? If there was intelligent design, then human men would either have functional testicles that stay inside, or tough testicles outside.

As to the temperature thing, that's stupid. Using birds as the example, when aroused their genitals come out. Meaning they would be perfectly able to regulate temperature once out. Do you see birds going extinct? I don't.

The fact is, human gonads are one of the best examples of un-intelligent design.

[Brother Love]

Re: Testicles help DISprove intelligent design!

Do you ever think about anything good and holy, Witch? Good God!

[OnYourKnees]

Re: Testicles help DISprove intelligent design!

Ok, I'm sure I'll get a good telling-off for posting the word 'testicle', but here it is. How would intelligent design answer the question of testicles? For you see, male avians (birds) have their sexual organs tucked neatly inside, and they only come out when it is time for the bird to mate.
Why is this not the case for human males as well?

So then, flat-earthers, explain that one.

If you'd studied human biology at all (instead of focusing on birds, which aren't even MAMMALS), you'd realize that sperm are at their most efficient -- whether they're "reproducing" sperm or "wife's a slut/other-man blocker" sperm -- when at the right temperature.

Testicles draw up close for warmth when cold, and relax when hot, as part of an INTELLIGENTLY DESIGNED temperature-management system.

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Ok, I'm sure I'll get a good telling-off for posting the word 'testicle', but here it is. How would intelligent design answer the question of testicles? For you see, male avians (birds) have their sexual organs tucked neatly inside, and they only come out when it is time for the bird to mate.
Why is this not the case for human males as well?

For as the men here probably know, even a slight prod to that area is enough to induce pain, and kicking a man hard enough there can induce unbelievable pain and/or medical problems.

So, if you believe in intelligent design, how do you explain the fact such a sensitive organ, vital for reproduction and survival of the race, has been placed in such a vulnerable position, as well as being extremely sensitive? You'd think it'd be at least tough.

So then, flat-earthers, explain that one.