[Bobby-Joe]

Re: TESTICLES disprove intelligent design!

I believe I already answered that, here:

http://landoverbaptist.net/showpost.php?p=37360&postcount=11

Why won't you say testicle? Sheesh, how old are you?

Our love sausage is external because we men like to pollute ourselves? What kind of nonsense is that? Monkey spanking has nothing to do with having kiddies, in fact Christian scientist have prove that self touching lowers a man's fertility.

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: TESTICLES disprove intelligent design!

I believe I already answered that, here:

http://landoverbaptist.net/showpost.php?p=37360&postcount=11

Why won't you say testicle? Sheesh, how old are you?

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: TESTICLES disprove intelligent design!

Nonsense, I merely summarized, dear Booby Joe.
You said:
'God gave men sensitive testacies (dammit, just say testicle!) so........'
Which is a way of saying 'because god did it', which could be further carried to the argument that all you creationists use, being 'it is that way because god desires it/says it should be.'

Yes, there's a slight variant, I do admit that, but ultimately it boils down to the same thing.

Really well let us try explaining daddy sacks with your Monkey God Darwin Miss Helsinger; as you point out they are such a vulnerable organ, so important to the future of the species that evolution would be against it. No wedding tackle means no kiddies. Right? So evolution would favor guys with better defended love baskets. Eventually men would have something like an armadillo in between their legs leaving men impervious to attacks from beasts and women.

The only logical explanation for such an important, yet vulnerable organ is God's will.

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: TESTICLES disprove intelligent design!

I didn't say that Rachael, read it again. "I said God gave men sensitive testacies so they would know what hell is like from getting kicked in the balls and fear it" You know I have a point harlot so that is why you ignored what I wrote

Nonsense, I merely summarized, dear Booby Joe.
You said:
'God gave men sensitive testacies (dammit, just say testicle!) so........'
Which is a way of saying 'because god did it', which could be further carried to the argument that all you creationists use, being 'it is that way because god desires it/says it should be.'

Yes, there's a slight variant, I do admit that, but ultimately it boils down to the same thing.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

See? Again you resort to 'because god said so'. Do you have any evidence to back you up? And no, the bible does not count. You don't, do you?

I didn't say that Rachael, read it again. "I said God gave men sensitive testacies so they would know what hell is like from getting kicked in the balls and fear it" You know I have a point harlot so that is why you ignored what I wrote

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

I hate to break it to you, but intelligent design as presented to the school boards is basically creationism with an attempt to disguise it. Yes, intelligent design implies a neutral viewpoint, merely a look to a nameless designer, but it's pretty much biblical creationism.

Walk around any of the fine stores in Freehold and you will see we put no stock in "nameless designers". Gucci, Prada, God. All the best designers go by name! Our shoes have labels, our handbags have labels, our clothes have labels, and praise Jesus, our planet has a label! Not sure where to look? It's there in plain sight, the first page of the King James Bible! Praise!

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

I hate to break it to you, but intelligent design as presented to the school boards is basically creationism with an attempt to disguise it. Yes, intelligent design implies a neutral viewpoint, merely a look to a nameless designer, but it's pretty much biblical creationism.

[Virginia Day Templeton]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

To iterate further, intelligent design is dangerous because it is deliberately nonspecific about the identity of the "designer" in question. Yes, the organisms with which we are forced to share our resources were created, but by whom, and for what purpose? Was the world made by Buddha, Mary, Satan, Oogaboogahar? ID doesn't say. We, of course, know that they were created by the Christian God of the Bible in order to serve man and thus in turn serve God Himself. But by refusing to specify the role of the One True God in His Creation, the IDers deny His absolute sovereignty and therefore Him altogether. It is an inherently pantheistic (Satanic) system.

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

To which I ask, does it say: "OTHER GODS, WHO WERE SONS OF GOD"? NO, it doesn't, YOU are interpretating.

Let me ask you:
Do you recognise satan as having been an angel before being cast down?
Do you consider him a god? (You vile devil-worshipper!)

Ok, consider this. It says 'the sons of god found the daughters OF MEN beautiful, and took wives such as they chose. The daughters of men, clearly suggesting a difference. If you believe your deity to indeed me a deity would it not be logical that if a deity were to have sons they'd be divine as well?
And by the way, quit throwing red herrings into my original debate!

Why should He make it easy for us?
We doesn't you mean don't even deserve any mercy from Him.

We're talking about the idea of INTELLIGENT design, not your views on deserved mercy for your deity. The fact still stands that the male apparatus has room for improvement, and could hardly be called an intelligent design.

Intelligent Design? There's nothing intelligent about it. In fact, it's as wicked as evilutionism, but much more subtle and insidious. It's the Creation Science equivalent of those lieberal Agnostichristian parishes where Pastor Feelgood blesses the unions of sodomites while paraphrasing the NIV and thinking lustful thoughts about the mulatto boy seated in the front pew... and as True Christians™, we must not settle for it. The LORD does not believe in half measures.

I dare you to make less sense right there.

Easy slick Baby Eater;

man must fear God and know God will send man to hell if man disobeys God. Therefore man must have an idea of the kind of pain hell is. That is why God, in His infinite merciful love, placed a highly sensitive daddy bag on man and beset him with a spiteful, harpyish wife who is depravedly obsessed with the daddy sack, constantly trying to bite it off or otherwise attacking it. Women don't have such things because they have no souls anyway to send to hell. GLORY!old

Any more questions harlot?

See? Again you resort to 'because god said so'. Do you have any evidence to back you up? And no, the bible does not count. You don't, do you?

I am HIGHLYOFFENDED!

I innocetnly clicked this thread expecting lies from Mrs. Hellbound. I however, DID NOT expect to be sexually assulted!

There should be a warning on the title of this thread. When I read your words I was accousted by PORN! I pert near fainted! You could have KILLED me! I could have fainted, hit my head on the bookcase behind me and DIED!

You filthy witch! I am assigning you 100 infraction points for posting this utter filth and failing to warn innocents that they are about to read PORN!

This thread is not fit for any True Christian™ Lady to lay her innocent eyes upon.


Disgusted, Sister Thumper

Sister Thumper, we've been through this. You with your delicate temperament should really get that padding on your desk and all around for while you're on the internet. That'd save you a lot of bumps and bruises from every time you see the word.................................get ready................................here it is..............................................TE STICLE!!

I just read this question for the first time. When humans are born, their package is neatly tucked behind skin. Then so called doctors snip it off, unless you're a joo. Then they wait till you're 13 ot 14. Also... Men who roll around on the ground for two house after a minor blow to the gonads, are looking for symapthy. They want someone to kiss them and make them all better.

You could ask why they're not completely inside. I'd say it's because we'd not be men if they were.

That isn't what I meant. I was comparing to birds, which have a ...... rectractable package, so the goods only come out when they need to mate. As funny as the idea of human men doing that would be , it'd still be more convenient.

[Rev. Dr. Davidson]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

For you see, male avians (birds) have their sexual organs tucked neatly inside, and they only come out when it is time for the bird to mate.
Why is this not the case for human males as well?

I just read this question for the first time. When humans are born, their package is neatly tucked behind skin. Then so called doctors snip it off, unless you're a joo. Then they wait till you're 13 ot 14. Also... Men who roll around on the ground for two house after a minor blow to the gonads, are looking for symapthy. They want someone to kiss them and make them all better.

You could ask why they're not completely inside. I'd say it's because we'd not be men if they were.

[Daisy Mae Johnson]

THE NERVE!

I am HIGHLYOFFENDED!

I innocetnly clicked this thread expecting lies from Mrs. Hellbound. I however, DID NOT expect to be sexually assulted!

There should be a warning on the title of this thread. When I read your words I was accousted by PORN! I pert near fainted! You could have KILLED me! I could have fainted, hit my head on the bookcase behind me and DIED!

You filthy witch! I am assigning you 100 infraction points for posting this utter filth and failing to warn innocents that they are about to read PORN!

This thread is not fit for any True Christian™ Lady to lay her innocent eyes upon.


Disgusted, Sister Thumper

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

Ok, I'm sure I'll get a good telling-off for posting the word 'testicle', but here it is. How would intelligent design answer the question of testicles? For you see, male avians (birds) have their sexual organs tucked neatly inside, and they only come out when it is time for the bird to mate.
Why is this not the case for human males as well?

For as the men here probably know, even a slight prod to that area is enough to induce pain, and kicking a man hard enough there can induce unbelievable pain and/or medical problems.

So, if you believe in intelligent design, how do you explain the fact such a sensitive organ, vital for reproduction and survival of the race, has been placed in such a vulnerable position, as well as being extremely sensitive? You'd think it'd be at least tough.

So then, flat-earthers, explain that one.

Easy slick Baby Eater;

man must fear God and know God will send man to hell if man disobeys God. Therefore man must have an idea of the kind of pain hell is. That is why God, in His infinite merciful love, placed a highly sensitive daddy bag on man and beset him with a spiteful, harpyish wife who is depravedly obsessed with the daddy sack, constantly trying to bite it off or otherwise attacking it. Women don't have such things because they have no souls anyway to send to hell. GLORY!

Any more questions harlot?

[Virginia Day Templeton]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

Intelligent Design? There's nothing intelligent about it. In fact, it's as wicked as evilutionism, but much more subtle and insidious. It's the Creation Science equivalent of those lieberal Agnostichristian parishes where Pastor Feelgood blesses the unions of sodomites while paraphrasing the NIV and thinking lustful thoughts about the mulatto boy seated in the front pew... and as True Christians™, we must not settle for it. The LORD does not believe in half measures.

Revelation 3:16
So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth.

It's almost as if He had the whole ID brouhaha in mind when He wrote that verse. And people say the Scriptures don't apply to today's world!

[SalvationSeeker]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

Does the bible say angels? No, it says 'sons of god'. If the writers wanted to say angels, they would have said angels, seeing as all through the bible and in Genesis it has no problem referring to angels. No, there is a clear difference there.
You are just giving your interpretation there, unless you are one of the biblical writers, you cannot say for certain what it is that they meant.

To which I ask, does it say: "OTHER GODS, WHO WERE SONS OF GOD"? NO, it doesn't, YOU are interpretating.

Let me ask you:
Do you recognise satan as having been an angel before being cast down?
Do you consider him a god? (You vile devil-worshipper!)

No, I'm merely pointing out the facts of what is written in the bible as I see 'em. The words, pure and simple. Not an interpretation. And isn't it you folk who always say that interpretations are 'twisting the words of the bible to suit one's own purpose'.
And interpreting to your own purpose is exactly what you are doing.

Oh really?
Why then does the Bible say we are the sons of God?

For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God.
Romans 8:14

Well, if your god were real and an all powerful deity, surely he'd be able to redesign his downstairs to allow for better, more convenient GONADS!

Why should He make it easy for us?
We doesn't even deserve any mercy from Him.

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

Well, if your god were real and an all powerful deity, surely he'd be able to redesign his downstairs to allow for better, more convenient MANLY BITS!

He's GOD! Everything's already convenient for Him! What, some planet is going to come whizzing along and catch him down there by surprise? It's not going to happen. He's God! And even if He did allow a planet to hit Him down there, it's not going to hurt Him. He's GOD!