[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Please tell me, precisely where it is a crime NOT to teach children how to have gay sex. This is a simple, straightforward question.

It is starting in the liberal region of California, home of Hellyweird and Sin Francisco.

You made an assertion, and I am asking you to provide evidence to support the assertion.

(There's actually a name for this process. It is called "rational thought.")

Awaiting your reply.

Did you think I was making this up?

Secondary schools across America, October will be designated as LGBT History Month. It is certain to feature prominently in California where promotion of homosexuality to all school children is now mandated by law. And it is likely to be observed in all of the classrooms controlled by the nationwide Gay Lesbian Straight Teachers Network...

LGBT History Month is not yet universally adopted by public schools. Nevertheless, throughout October tens, perhaps hundreds of thousands of innocent school children will be subjected to the most despicable brainwashing ever conducted in American classrooms. They will be taught, through carefully constructed lesson plans, to view homosexuals as a superior class of human beings....

as reported in the news

[Openplanet]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

You won't exist after you die. And that's what you can't tolerate.

BTW...why don't you add a swastika to your icon collection?

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

BTW...why don't you add a swastika to your icon collection?

Because we don't worship cows, you racist meanie.

[Jack O'fagan]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

If there is no conceivable evidence that would cause you to conclude that your theory is false, then it is not a scientific theory.

It's not a theory.

YIC

Jack

[Jack O'fagan]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

You won't exist after you die. And that's what you can't tolerate.

No, we WILL exist after we die. And that's what you can't tolerate.

Matthew 5:10
Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness' sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

YIC

Jack

[Zechariah Smyth]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

You won't exist after you die. And that's what you can't tolerate.

I'll be in Heaven!

It's people like you who are afraid of dying. This is why you want to murder babies to harvest their stem cells in some freakish attempt to live longer.



Accept Jesus Christ and live FOREVER!!!



YiC,

Zech

[Openplanet]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Show me an example of a lesson plan carefully designed to portray homosexuals as a superior class of human beings.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Show me an example of a lesson plan carefully designed to portray homosexuals as a superior class of human beings.

Are you seriously asking me to make my way out to California, walk into any public school, demand to see their curriculum, and take xerox copies to show you?

Did you even read the news article I linked?

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

There is one, single, clear, bulletproof way to show that "creationism" is not science.

The single, critical, essential feature of a theory or hypothesis that makes it a scientific theory or hypothesis is that there is some conceivable evidence against it! That is, in order for a theory to be science as opposed to pure faith, there must be some data, some evidence which, if found, would cause you to reject it, to conclude that it is false, This basic notion should be taught in every science class.

What makes you think that the Bible isn't falsifiable?

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Show me an example of a lesson plan carefully designed to portray homosexuals as a superior class of human beings.

What do you think the whole game about gay marriage is about?

[aUniversityStudent]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Thank you Bobby-Joe for this excellent compilation of items against the theory of evolution. I would like to respond to some and see how well or (probably) poorly my answers will be received.

Here is some questions for the scientific theocrats of the Darwinist Gestapo to try and answer;

Account for the missing land sharks
If we evolved from fish, why haven’t sharks, who according to your theory predate us, evolved into land animals and are hunting us?

there is no 'set' path that all animals will take. Evolution is a process that involves randomness yes, but is also dependent on the environment. The easy answer is why would they? They can swim fine and they already have gills to breathe water and catch plenty of fish with all those teeth. There's nothing pushing them into another climate or habitat so they will stay largely the same.

Explain floods on Mars with out the Great Flood of the Bible
If Noah’s flood didn’t happen then how do explain the evidence of a great flood on Mars?[/

Just because 1 event did not happen does not mean a similar event could never happen. If this were true the Universe would have faded into nothingness long ago. The Bible story of a flood which covered every inch of the earth up to the highest mountains is being called into question, and the physics of it are equally questionable. That doesn't mean large floods can't happen here, or on mars, or on a distant planet in another galaxy!

Account for fools
If evolution is survival of the fittest then how do explain the continued survival of unsuccessful groups of stupid humans?

Evolution is not survival of the fittest, it is survival of the fit. You don't have to be 'smart' to survive these days. You have to be honest and hard working and you will make it. Or inherit a lot of money. Or you could be a ward/dependent of the state (like be on welfare or food stamps). Not suggested but it happens in real life so it answers your question.

Explain why human's aren't perfect
If we are evolving why don’t we have third arms now?

Are you implying that humans should be perfect? That is an idea that started in the mind of Satan in the garden when he tempted Eve so no thank you for your hidden evil poisons. A third arm would not make us perfect....where would it go? It would also take a lot of extra energy to support it so it is not as efficient as two. Some humans are actually born with extra arms, legs, heads, genitals, digits, but you all would probably scream mutants and burn them from what I've seen.

Explain infant murder
If we are evolved to nature our young then how do you secular humanist explain your groups pathological desire to kill yours with abortions?

I don't know what 'nature our young' means. But the question stands. There are plenty of animal species that will devour or kill their own young. Sometimes when there isn't enough food to go around one of the weaker younglings must die off for the others to live. Sometimes even the mother- so she can go on reproducing later. Why should it be different with humans?

Why no bodies?
If humanity was roughly a million people living at one time. If the human race is 150,000 years old like you maintain that means there have been 150,000,000,000 who lived before the current era. If each corpse takes up 3 by 6 feet then that means the remains of human ancestors cover 1350 billion square feet of the earth! Why are we not buried under the remains of 150 billion people?
The human race is estimated by arthropoligsts to be around 250,000 years old, not 150k. And yes, there have been billions of us. But most haven't been buried they have died and decomposed. Are you SERIOUS?

Were do angels and demons fit into the Evolutionist tree of life?
Please explain the earliest common ancestor with all animals, angles and demons. What is their ancestry and transitional form?

They don't. If they did, and they did have ancestry and transitional forms, then Noah would have had to put all of them on the Ark because it says the ark held all creatures. And it is silly to say Noah got pairs of every angel and demon and put them on the ark....or is it? You tell me.

Explain talking snake in the garden threw evolution.
Please tell me when serpents lost the power of speech and the process with which it happened. Please include any fossil of impaired speech snakes.

A snake cannot lose the power of speech because a snake, by itself, cannot speak. I would reference you to every snake or snake fossil or snake skin that has ever existed. If you can find a snake with voice box capable of vibrating at a resonant frequency capable of creating a pitch that humans can hear, as well as a brain that is capable of producing language (we only know of a few of those, in humans and some apes) then OK I guess this question might be legitimate.

Explain the Loch Ness Monster threw evolution.
I find it hard to believe that a whole species can sustain itself from so few individuals as observed in Loch Ness. Sounds like a hole in your theory to me

The Loch Ness Monster? You might as well use Bigfoot as an example to prove God. Or the boogie man. I can see it now "best way to argue against evolutionists: the boogie man!" Please.

If evolution is true, then why don't trees stretch up to the stratosphere?
Scientists say that trees grow taller and taller because natural selection forces them to compete for light with other trees. However, they have supposedly had hundreds of millions of years to evolve, but the tallest tree in the world is a mere 370 feet tall.

If evolution were true, we should be living in pitch dark, because the entire troposphere would be encased in a big sheet of tree leaves. Asked by Pastor Billy-Rueben

There are limits to any system. For example Moore's law says that computing power doubles every 18 months. And we can all see that our phones and laptops get better each month. But not forever. Technology, population, everything that grows has a limit. Its like asking why can't I eat so much food that I eventually weigh more than the entire earth. Well you'd get 1% there and die.

Why don't we act like monkeys
If we are evolved from monkeys why do we behave like them; service our selves constantly an throw our feces about? Asked by Eight or Better
We do act like monkeys. We are social animals, we hoot and holler at each other (and occasionally throw feces, literally and metaphorically), we use tools, we have language, we groom the ones that are close to us, we are defensive of those in "our group" and aggressive towards the "others". We smile. And I see so many people coming to faith looking to redeem themselves from being addicted to a drug, or fornicating, or what have you. That's the servicing ourselves you mentioned.

Why are there still monkey?
Evolution predicts the stronger species (humans) would crush and exterminate the weaker species(monkeys) it evolved from. Asked by ChristianSoldier

Nowhere does the evolutionary theory say that there are two species, the weak and the strong, and the strong always wins. Why would humans crush and exterminate the cute little chimps? No seriously, why would anyone get up before the US Senate and say "with God on our side we are going to go out and kill every monkey because we can!" That's like me asking you "why are there still atheists if christianity is right" because it is a loaded question whose premise is flawed.

Please account for quick extinctions.
According to evolution theory it takes millions of years for a species to go extinct. Yet we have examples of species dying out in a few hunderd years like the Dodo. Please account for this.
By normal means, over millions of years species will diversify, some will split, some will become extinct. Some, like the dinosaurs become extinct relatively quickly. As far as the Dodo, the Bible says that Noah brought two of each animal on the ark so he must have had a Dodo and by that logic the Dodo as a species is at least a few thousand years old, please account for this!

Were are ancestors and fossilizes remains of the dragon, satyr and unicorn?
I would say the lack of fossils for these three creatures presents a clear gap in the record.
Those are mythical creatures. We don't expect fossils of creatures that exist only in the human imagination.Although I'm sure you could find some convincing hoaxes if you were desperate.

Why are no human ancestors mentioned in The Bible?
The very fact that Neandertals, Homo-Erectuces are not mentioned in The Bible proves they are made up. I mean you would think God would have mentioned them 6,000 years ago when He wrote The Bible. duh.

The Mayans aren't mentioned in the Bible, so they didn't exist? Who build the Mayan Civilization then? Ham sandwiches aren't mentioned in the bible, yet they exist. I see nothing that would imply any entity not discussed in the bible cannot exist.

Explain wasps with evolution.
Wasp paralyze spiders and then implant their young in them to feed on living, but helpless insect. If evolution was true them spiders would have anti-wasp poison in their blood. But they don’t. The only way you can get such a horrific death as those countless spiders suffer is threw the power of God.

This is a horrible thing to say- the only way to really torture an innocent creature is with GOD. Wasps developed, through evolution, a strategy to ensure their survival. A dead spider doesn't know what its body is being used for and it cant go back in time to then consciously evolve in a way that would bar the wasp from doing that.

How could Cain could procreate with his sisters if evolution was true?
If can was getting busy with his sister like The Bible relates then the human race should be a race of inbreed deformities like the English Royal Family. Instead we see the general population is healthy. This can only happen if Cain and his sister were of the pure first generation after Adam not corrupted by sins yet.

My only response to this is: the bible says that every single human being alive today is a result of thousands of years of incest. And yet here we are. We know that humans can't produce fertile offspring through incest, yet we are evaluating a claim that fertile humans were produced through thousands of years of such activities. It seems to me they are mutually exclusive.

The Genealogy of Henry III
The "Evidence From Genealogy" display, donated by Edgar Nurnberg, is one of the more favorite displays of our visitors. These scrolls from the Lambeth Palace in England trace the genealogy of King Henry the 6th back to Adam and Eve.
Asked by Heathen Basher 8/18/09

If you say so.

Unicorn Horns
What so-called "evoloutionary role" does the horn on a unicorn play? I was taught evolutionary theory, and I can't figure it out! Asked by H. Montague Worthington's 8/24/09

Me neither! How are we to guess the characteristics of something we have never seen and have no evidence of?

Transitional fossils for single celled organism.
The Darwinists would have us believe that life evolved from single-celled organisms to more complicated forms. If that's true, then we should expect to see intermediaries between organisms with one cell and organisms with millions/billions/trillions of cells, but that's exactly what we don't see. Where are all the two-celled organisms that we should see if evolution was true? Where are all the five-celled organisms or twelve-celled organisms? Are we supposed to believe that 50 million amoebas randomly assembled into a fully formed flatworm by chance? Asked by Pastor Billy-Reuben. 8/25/09

Single celled organisms have no bones. You need bones to have a fossil. Ever notice how the only thing archeologists dig up is bones?

Why is there still mud?
Darwinists claim that life originate in mud. If you really believe that a big pile of mud turned into a fish, which sprouted legs and arms and turned into monkeys, which turned into human beings, then you're more stupid than I thought. For a start, if that's true, why's there still mud around, and why do babies not have tails like monkeys when they're born? Asked by Rachel Pierce 11/4/09

Nobody believes what you have just stated. A straw man argument is taking a position you don't believe in, making it something completely different and utterly ridiculous, and attacking it. You have just created the most beautiful strawman argument, I have never seen one like this. Congrats.

Why don't chemicals think?
If our brains are just a mishmash of biochemistry, how come chemicals like gasoline or bug spray can't think? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10

Our brains are not 'just' a mishmash of biochemisty. Our brain is in fact the most awesome, powerful creation we have ever seen. It has billions of neurons and connections that run on electrical impulses, in addition to biochemistry. But just because you have the 'hardware' doesn't mean it will run on just any fuel. Gasoline and Bug spray are man-made chemicals, for one. And how could a human brain run on an energy source that requires an already functioning brain to produce? Sounds like you kind of implied the answer to your own question.

Why don't we have natural clothing?
People have been wearing clothes for thousands of years. Why haven't our bodies evolved natural clothes that come out of our skin then? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10

We do have natural clothing. It is called skin and hair. However because we have access to nice clothes and temperature-controlled rooms we will continue to lose hair as our bodies adapt to the environment. Clothes are made from hemp, cotton, etc and we can't just grow plants out of our skin!

What was the "evolutionary advantage" of Adam's extra rib?
Why do women have an extra rib than men like the Bible tells us. asked by Virginia D. Templeton 6/8/07

Men and women are naturally born with 24 ribs, so no.

What is the evolutionary advantage of demonic possession
Please explain how demonic possesions humans, horses, dogs and pigs helps them to be a more successful species. asked by Virginia D. Templeton 6/8/07

I am sorry but I do not understand the connection between possession and animals like pigs. In fact, I have never seen evidence of a demon or a possession other than in every horror movie spewed out by hollywood this past year so I cannot say that I believe in one.

Do you believe that Jesus was more primitive and less "fit" than today's slugs and worms?
Christ earthly ministery was 2,000 years ago, a more primitive time than now. asked by Virginia D. Templeton 6/8/07

This question reflects a deep misunderstanding of science and possible an even deeper misunderstanding of religion, unfortunately.

What did the rocks and lightning evolve from?
According to evolutionary theory, all life evolved out of rocks and lightning,Please show the evolutionary linage and transitional forums for rocks and lighting. asked by Virginia D. Templeton 6/8/07

Again I am sorry but it seems ms. Templeton is just not up to date with her information. Things have to be alive to evolve. A rock and lightning are not examples of living things, so they do not follow the same rules as us creatures do. However the evolution of rocks is a very interesting topic, countless geologists have devoted their lives to understanding our Earth's crust and its evolution in time.

Please show the disorder inherent in evolution
Scientific "laws" regarding thermodynamics and entropy say that things go from ordered to disordered. ?]How do you explain evolution in light of this. asked by Virginia D. Templeton 6/8/07

Thermodynamics and entropy are closed systems like a thermal combustion engine. If you can convince me that the complexity of life on earth is like a combustion engine then I will concede evolution violates the 2nd law. But life on earth isn't a thermal combustion engine so no.

Where are those transitional forms???
asked by Virginia D. Templeton 6/8/07

For what?

Well evolutionist, please give it your best shot. Even one question will be helpful. I look forward to your answers.

I hope my answers were concise. I am sorry that some of the questions were just plain bad questions- either poor grammar that I couldn't understand or loaded questions that seemed ridiculous on every level. I am not here to bash anything or defend anything but only to try and answer the questions I think I know a little about. Who knows!

[Marshall]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Evolution is a liberal hoax and is all part of the war on Christianity. There is no evidence other than rocks and "science" neither of which is conclusive. Fossils are obviously the result of intense pressure and compression cause by...billions of cubic miles of water. The flood created the fossil record and deposited seashells all over the world from the tops of mountains to the bottom of the sea. Its the only explanation because otherwise the planet would have to have been 100% submerged for "millions of years" for a fossil sea critter to form on a mountain top. Its like evolutionists think were stupid even though we have been here longer than they have and have known the truth since 4000BC.
We arent descended from monkeys BECAUSE MONKEYS STILL EXIST. Obviously.

Get a clue, and buy a bible so you can be smart.

[aUniversityStudent]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Yes Marshal, I read much of your beliefs in the post I had already responded to (because they are the same). I was hoping that you or someone else would then respond to MY post, in which case we would create a dialogue with which some understanding may be attained. If you simply restate what has already been said, we can't get anywhere! I just want to know where I'm wrong so I can adopt a more consistent viewpoint. Thank you.

[Billy Bob Jenkins]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Yes Marshal, I read much of your beliefs in the post I had already responded to (because they are the same). I was hoping that you or someone else would then respond to MY post, in which case we would create a dialogue with which some understanding may be attained. If you simply restate what has already been said, we can't get anywhere! I just want to know where I'm wrong so I can adopt a more consistent viewpoint. Thank you.

You fail to provide a single link for even one of your erroneous claims. So your belligerent crusade against God doesn't warrant a response.

[aUniversityStudent]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

How can I? Every single one of those questions I answered is on the topic of evolution (micro/macro), speciation, diversification, phylogeny, and more. These topics weren't discovered until just recently so how could they be in the bible?

I predict you will say: "well they're not in the bible so I don't need to know nothing about them"

Cars are in the bible, yet you know about that. Your social security number is not in the bible, yet it is REAL and you NEED it. Ham sandwiches aren't in the bible but we all love them.

When I write scholarly papers (yes, they are peer reviewed) I have to cite any information that is not common knowledge. Lightning and rocks not being alive thus not being subject to evolutionary rules is common knowledge, thus requires no citation. And if you really need a bible verse to show you that rocks are not alive, then I guess I'll just drop this topic.