[YOULIEMUCH!]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Why would anyone be interested in knowledge that's not from God?

1 Timothy 6:20 O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:

Indeed my brother! I just sit in the corner and read the bible.

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

However macro evolution (which I'm assuming you were trying to prove with a "person climbing out of the jar) cannot be done in a month's span. Macro evolution takes place over an extremely long period of time. Sadly not quick enough to be observe the noticeable changes between species.

But, conveniently for the "Evilutionist" it is so long that no one has ever seen it! Why would you believe in something you've never seen and for which all evidence lies in the hands of atheist scientists!?

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Indeed my brother! I just sit in the corner and read the bible.

Oh how wonderful!

Why not skip on over to our friendly Introduction forum and tell us what your favorite Bible verse is!

[tom kinight]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

First off all dinosaurs were not vegetarians. An examination of
their dental architecture will immediately reveal that. As for bears
they are mammals and like most mammals they have a mix of teeth -
incisors, canines,under-developed carnasials, premolars and molars, In
fact their dentition is similar to the dog. Curiously, the under
developed carnasial teeth suggest that some bears are adapting to a
more vegetarian diet. However, the polar bear's dental development is
just the opposite, and the carnasial teeth appear to be increasing in
size, suggesting a return to a more traditionally carnivore diet.
But seriously, what the hell am I doing arguing dental morphology with
someone who thinks the Flintstones belongs on the History Channel?

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Idiotic blather about teeth

How do observable changes in modern animals prove the origins of the universe?

Oh, wait. They don't.

[tom kinight]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Here is some questions for the scientific theocrats of the Darwinist Gestapo to try and answer;Well evolutionist, please give it your best shot. Even one question will be helpful. I look forward to your answers.

Here is some questions for the scientific theocrats of the Darwinist
Gestapo to try and answer;
Account for the missing land sharks If we evolved from fish, why haven’t sharks, who according to your
theory predate us, evolved into land animals and are hunting us?

Explain floods on Mars with out the Great Flood of the Bible
What a stupid idea of a theory and clear does not follow evolution at all.
If Noah’s flood didn’t happen then how do explain the evidence of
> a great flood on Mars?[/



Who has proved floods on Mars in the first place????
> Account for fools
> If evolution is survival of the fittest then how do explain the
> continued survival of unsuccessful groups of stupid humans?



The fittest does not say those with the best brains you nut.
> Explain why human's aren't perfect
> If we are evolving why don’t we have third arms now?



Who said more arms would help.
> Explain infant murder
> If we are evolved to nature our young then how do you secular
> humanist explain your groups pathological desire to kill yours with
> abortions?


Abortion do not kill infants they remove a fetus or embryo.
> Why no bodies?
> If humanity was roughly a million people living at one time. If
> the human race is 150,000 years old like you maintain that means there
> have been 150,000,000,000 who lived before the current era. If each
> corpse takes up 3 by 6 feet then that means the remains of human
> ancestors cover 1350 billion square feet of the earth! Why are we not
> buried under the remains of 150 billion people?



Bodies rot or are eaten by worms or other earth microbes you ass.
> Were do angels and demons fit into the Evolutionist tree of life?
> Please explain the earliest common ancestor with all animals,
> angles and demons. What is their ancestry and transitional form?



Angles and demons do not exist they are just fantasy stories
> Explain talking snake in the garden threw evolution.
> Please tell me when serpents lost the power of speech and the
> process with which it happened. Please include any fossil of impaired
> speech snakes.



That is just another tall tale from the bible.
> Explain the Loch Ness Monster threw evolution.
> I find it hard to believe that a whole species can sustain itself
> from so few individuals as observed in Loch Ness. Sounds like a hole
> in your theory to me



Nessie has never been proved to exist.
> If evolution is true, then why don't trees stretch up to the
>stratosphere?
> Scientists say that trees grow taller and taller because natural
> selection forces them to compete for light with other trees. However,
they have supposedly had hundreds of millions of years to evolve, but
the tallest tree in the world is a mere 370 feet tall.



Some types of trees are tall others are short , it all deepens on the
root system that supports the trunk size.

[Born Again Bob]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Dear Friend,

Who has proved floods on Mars in the first place????

Please don't post on our science forums if you're not up to date on scientific literature.

The fittest does not say those with the best brains you nut.
...Who said more arms would help.

So, in your expert opinion, limbless idiots are "the fittest" in the struggle for survival? Are you even listening to yourself?

Abortion do not kill infants they remove a fetus or embryo.

I suppose that's why they scream their mother's name.

Angles and demons do not exist they are just fantasy stories

I can assure you that angles exist. Even public schools are teaching geometry at this point. Again, if you're not up to date on the literature, don't post here.

Yours in His Science,
BAB

[Openplanet]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

There is one, single, clear, bulletproof way to show that "creationism" is not science.

The single, critical, essential feature of a theory or hypothesis that makes it a scientific theory or hypothesis is that there is some conceivable evidence against it! That is, in order for a theory to be science as opposed to pure faith, there must be some data, some evidence which, if found, would cause you to reject it, to conclude that it is false, This basic notion should be taught in every science class.

Scientific theories are never "proven" to be absolutely, 100% "true"; instead, scientists look as hard as they can for evidence that would prove their theories false. With each experiment that fails to disconfirm a theory, we have more and more confidence in it.

Now, here's the point. Ask a creationist to describe some evidence, any conceivable evidence which would cause him or her to reject creationism as false. They will not be able to. Case closed.

If there is no conceivable evidence that would cause you to conclude that your theory is false, then it is not a scientific theory. It is something you take on faith, which is your right. But it is not science, and you are simply incorrect to consider it as science.

[Redeemed Papist]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

There is one, single, clear, bulletproof way to show that "creationism" is not science.

The single, critical, essential feature of a theory or hypothesis that makes it a scientific theory or hypothesis is that there is some conceivable evidence against it! That is, in order for a theory to be science as opposed to pure faith, there must be some data, some evidence which, if found, would cause you to reject it, to conclude that it is false, This basic notion should be taught in every science class.

Scientific theories are never "proven" to be absolutely, 100% "true"; instead, scientists look as hard as they can for evidence that would prove their theories false. With each experiment that fails to disconfirm a theory, we have more and more confidence in it.

Now, here's the point. Ask a creationist to describe some evidence, any conceivable evidence which would cause him or her to reject creationism as false. They will not be able to. Case closed.

If there is no conceivable evidence that would cause you to conclude that your theory is false, then it is not a scientific theory. It is something you take on faith, which is your right. But it is not science, and you are simply incorrect to consider it as science.

Evidence that Jesus was not real. But He was. Therefore the Bible is true.

Are you some sort of retarded person?

[Brother Harold Porter]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Scientific theories are never "proven" to be absolutely, 100% "true"; instead, scientists look as hard as they can for evidence that would prove their theories false.

So then why bother with all the conjecture and guesswork if you might be wrong?

My friend, why do you hate God and refuse to give Him the credit and glory He is due? Tell the truth, you would urinate on the Baby Jesus if given the chance, correct?

In Christ

[Openplanet]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

The United States ranks at or near the bottom of industrialized countries on virtually all comparative High School math and science achievement tests (not to mention history, geography, etc.).

We're also the only industrialized country in which there's even a debate about the validity of evolution.

Isn't the connection obvious?

It's very, very sad.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

The United States ranks at or near the bottom of industrialized countries on virtually all comparative High School math and science achievement tests (not to mention history, geography, etc.).

We're also the only industrialized country in which there's even a debate about the validity of evolution.

Isn't the connection obvious?

It's very, very sad.

Yes! The moment they took prayer out of public school, the spiral downward has been picking up speed! Why, now it's even a crime to NOT teach children how to have gay sex!

[Openplanet]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Please tell me, precisely where it is a crime NOT to teach children how to have gay sex. This is a simple, straightforward question.

You made an assertion, and I am asking you to provide evidence to support the assertion.

(There's actually a name for this process. It is called "rational thought.")

Awaiting your reply.

[Openplanet]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Ecclesiastes 9, 10:

Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do it with thy might; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor wisdom, in the grave, whither thou goest.

There is one fundamental, essential factor that motivates each and every one of you, and that is your inability to tolerate the idea of your own non-existence.

[Zechariah Smyth]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Ecclesiastes 9, 10:

Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do it with thy might; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor wisdom, in the grave, whither thou goest.

There is one fundamental, essential factor that motivates each and every one of you, and that is your inability to tolerate the idea of your own non-existence.

You think I don't exist?



You Jesus-haters crack me up!

YiC,

Z. Smyth