[Cranky Old Man]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

There, I did the best I could.

If by that you mean your wall of nonsense I pity those who have to live around you. Allow me to point out the highlights:

"Your opposition to contraception further fuels the abortion fire." Nonsense, if people practice abstinence, they won't get pregnant. It's as easy as that!

"Or it can happen if the beginning population was much larger than one man, one woman, and their two sons. Genetics has already proved it impossible for adam and eve to have happened." Nonsense, even if evolution would be true, there still would have been a very first man and a very first woman. Or do you claim that by some amazing coincidence this happened multiple times at different locations all over the world at exactly the same moment?

"There is no situation where a third arm would provide more beneficial to breeding and spreading genes." Nonsense. According to your flawed reasoning we would all have 1 arm with 3 or 4 fingers. 5 fingers is not better or worse than 4 or 6 fingers. It just happens to be the amount God choose when He created us.

[BelieverInGod]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

"There is no situation where a third arm would provide more beneficial to breeding and spreading genes." Nonsense. According to your flawed reasoning we would all have 1 arm with 3 or 4 fingers. 5 fingers is not better or worse than 4 or 6 fingers. It just happens to be the amount God choose when He created us.

Well I know that, as a mother, a third arm would be a wonderful "evilutionary" advancement. Then again, if we're from monkeys, I want my tail back. It may not be as useful as an extra arm, but I could rock a cradle while doing something else with both hands. Also reaching things on the top shelves would be easier.

[Tool of satan]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Here is some questions for the scientific theocrats of the Darwinist Gestapo to try and answer;

Were do angels and demons fit into the Evolutionist tree of life?
Please explain the earliest common ancestor with all animals, angles and demons. What is their ancestry and transitional form?

Well evolutionist, please give it your best shot. Even one question will be helpful. I look forward to your answers.

I chose specifically to answer this question as the purpose of this post is a little different.

Angels and demons are not part of the theory of evolution, they are part of the Bible. As True Christians have pointed out, the theory of evolution is directly incompatible with the Bible.

From a scientific perspective, this question is easily answered. There is no evidence that angels or demons ever existed. Evolutionists do not take the Bible as evidence.

A person with a religious perspective, however, has the idea that the Bible is always correct, therefore, angels and demons must exist and the lack of fossil evidence for these beings proves evolutionists wrong.

This leads to a question.
The intent of this thread is to ask questions that evolutionists cannot answer. Why is it that some of the questions view the facts from a religious perspective, rather than a scientific one as an evolutionist would? They would not be stymied by appeals to the Bible.

Cutting out the Bible-based questions for evolutionists may strengthen the thread's purpose as a whole, though, if I may point out, no one, religious or otherwise, has yet found credible evidence that disproves evolution, which is why the theory still stands.

[Redeemed Papist]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Angels and demons are not part of the theory of evolution...

That's one of the things wrong with it, yes.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Cutting out the Bible-based questions for evolutionists may strengthen the thread's purpose as a whole, though, if I may point out, no one, religious or otherwise, has yet found credible evidence that disproves evolution, which is why the theory still stands.

Yes, very convenient that. Somehow evolution has all the answers.

[Tool of satan]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Yes, very convenient that. Somehow evolution has all the answers.

Yes, evolution has logical answers supported by evidence, for all that it applies to.

[BelieverInGod]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Yes, evolution has logical answers supported by evidence, for all that it applies to.

Bluntly, then why did we lose our tails? I think a monkeys tail would be a very useful appendage. Why did we lose the strength of the chimpanzees? Why did we lose sharp teeth?

How did we climb to the top of the pile when we have no claws, no sharp teeth, we're rather slow and weak, and made out of soft squishy flesh?

[Tool of satan]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Bluntly, then why did we lose our tails? I think a monkeys tail would be a very useful appendage. Why did we lose the strength of the chimpanzees? Why did we lose sharp teeth?

How did we climb to the top of the pile when we have no claws, no sharp teeth, we're rather slow and weak, and made out of soft squishy flesh?

Tails.
Humans started walking upright to have an advantage over other animals. They were able to walk across large distances and move away from trees. As a result, tails were no longer useful to humans, as it was not needed for balance or it's other primary functions. The theory would probably follow the belief that the tail became a liability to humans, interfering with their ability to survive. The ones with shorter tails were able to survive and reproduce, handing down genes over time until all that is left of the human 'tail' is now the coccyx.

The sharp teeth. I'm not entirely sure about the evolution of human teeth, but I do know that teeth evolve with respect to diet. Animals with the best adapted teeth to their environment can eat enough to thrive and reproduce.

The chimpanzee strength and the "top of the pile" questions can both be answered at once.
Brains are the reason we have climbed to the top. Humans evolved larger brains, giving them the essential ability to communicate with precision, use tools, think logically, and so much more. This is a huge advantage over any other animal. We do not need as much strength anymore because we can use our brains to build and create things that take away the need for physical effort.

[sumdumgai808]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Bluntly, then why did we lose our tails? I think a monkeys tail would be a very useful appendage. Why did we lose the strength of the chimpanzees? Why did we lose sharp teeth?

How did we climb to the top of the pile when we have no claws, no sharp teeth, we're rather slow and weak, and made out of soft squishy flesh?

Not all members of the primate family have tails, as I'm sure someone of your intelligence can understand.

As for the teeth, our teeth adapted to our diet. I'm also sure that you know your different teeth are designed for different purposes. Your incisors are for biting into things, your canines are for ripping and tearing your food, and of course your bicuspids and molars are for grinding your food. Some of these teeth are also found in primates as well.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Tails.
Humans started walking upright to have an advantage over other animals. They were able to walk across large distances and move away from trees. As a result, tails were no longer useful to humans, as it was not needed for balance or it's other primary functions. The theory would probably follow the belief that the tail became a liability to humans, interfering with their ability to survive. The ones with shorter tails were able to survive and reproduce, handing down genes over time until all that is left of the human 'tail' is now the coccyx.

The sharp teeth. I'm not entirely sure about the evolution of human teeth, but I do know that teeth evolve with respect to diet. Animals with the best adapted teeth to their environment can eat enough to thrive and reproduce.

The chimpanzee strength and the "top of the pile" questions can both be answered at once.
Brains are the reason we have climbed to the top. Humans evolved larger brains, giving them the essential ability to communicate with precision, use tools, think logically, and so much more. This is a huge advantage over any other animal. We do not need as much strength anymore because we can use our brains to build and create things that take away the need for physical effort.

Son, that doesn't make any sense. In the 6000 years of human history, all of which has been recorded, there is no example of a person with a tail in any picture or story. I've seen photographs of my great-great grandmother's family when she was just a young girl. No one in my family had any tails, not even little stubby ones. People like that were freaks, and made a living in the circus because they were so rare.



This image has a tail, but he is a mythical creature. Note the wings. People never had wings. Don't be confused by art like this. It's not representative of reality.





Not a single tail on any human in this historical record.

[Tool of satan]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Son, that doesn't make any sense. In the 6000 years of human history, all of which has been recorded, there is no example of a person with a tail in any picture or story. I've seen photographs of my great-great grandmother's family when she was just a young girl. No one in my family had any tails, not even little stubby ones. People like that were freaks, and made a living in the circus because they were so rare.

This image has a tail, but he is a mythical creature. Note the wings. People never had wings. Don't be confused by art like this. It's not representative of reality.

Not a single tail on any human in this historical record.

It really depends on what version of human history you'd like to believe. When arguing with the secular type, you have to accept that they believe that the Earth is billions of years old.

In which case, modern humans appeared around 200,000 years ago, far before recorded history. However, hominids, to which humans are a subcategory, lost their tails around 20 million years ago, according to known fossil records.

[Betty Sue]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

I HAVE A cousine whow as born with a tail I DONT' konw if he still hass it though

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

It really depends on what version of human history you'd like to believe.

No it doesn't. It really depends on the truth. The funny thing about facts is, they don't care whether or not you believe in them.

[BelieverInGod]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Tails.
Humans started walking upright to have an advantage over other animals. They were able to walk across large distances and move away from trees. As a result, tails were no longer useful to humans, as it was not needed for balance or it's other primary functions. The theory would probably follow the belief that the tail became a liability to humans, interfering with their ability to survive. The ones with shorter tails were able to survive and reproduce, handing down genes over time until all that is left of the human 'tail' is now the coccyx.

But kangaroos go "upright" and they still have their tails. I'm not kidding, a tail would come in very handy. You want to see something with a useless tail, look at the peacock.

The sharp teeth. I'm not entirely sure about the evolution of human teeth, but I do know that teeth evolve with respect to diet. Animals with the best adapted teeth to their environment can eat enough to thrive and reproduce.

Okay, then what about wisdom teeth? Why would we evolve wisdom teeth? Also, even a horses teeth are sharper than ours (ever been bitten by one of those things?)

The chimpanzee strength and the "top of the pile" questions can both be answered at once.
Brains are the reason we have climbed to the top. Humans evolved larger brains, giving them the essential ability to communicate with precision, use tools, think logically, and so much more. This is a huge advantage over any other animal. We do not need as much strength anymore because we can use our brains to build and create things that take away the need for physical effort.

Okay, so you say brains gave us the evolutionary advantage, and then scientists tell us that apes and whales are just as smart as we are. If this is true, then where is the "evolutionary advantage"?

Also, brains doesn't seem all that useful when being chased down by a lion or a pack of wolves. Some extra speed or some claws would be very handy.

[Tool of satan]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

No it doesn't. It really depends on the truth. The funny thing about facts is, they don't care whether or not you believe in them.

For the impartial, yes. For Christians, also yes, with the Bible being the truth. For secular people, yes as well, the truth is found through logical reasoning and experimentation.

So it depends on which viewpoint you have, rather than the truth, as people's views of the truth is are different. When trying to get the secular to reject evolution, you must either change their views of what the truth is or attempt to disprove evolution logically, the latter of which is what this thread is meant to do. This approach is extremely difficult, as no one has yet to point out logically why evolution is wrong.