[Mrs. Rogers]

Re: Genesis crushes silly Big Bang theory

Doesn't the Genesis story assume the existence of light is independent of the Sun? In other words, that light for day and night can exist on the Earth without the sun to provide light for the Earth? Where is such an independent source?

Isn't it obvious? GOD Himself is positively glowing. Glory!

Psalms 89:15: Blessed is the people that know the joyful sound: they shall walk, O LORD, in the light of thy countenance.

.

[F. Nietzsche]

Re: Genesis crushes silly Big Bang theory

Isn't it obvious? GOD Himself is positively glowing. Glory!

Psalms 89:15: Blessed is the people that know the joyful sound: they shall walk, O LORD, in the light of thy countenance.

.

But if that were the case, then why does God seem to be absent when the sun goes down, yet present when the sun goes up. Or, for that matter, why would it seem that all light that we observe (with exception to the stars at night) is either originating from the Sun or reflected from other celestial objects?

Doesn't it seem disingeneous to credit the source of light as being God when it seems evident enough that it's the monstrous fusion reactor of the Sun which is providing it to us?

[True Disciple]

Re: Genesis crushes silly Big Bang theory

But if that were the case, then why does God seem to be absent when the sun goes down, yet present when the sun goes up. Or, for that matter, why would it seem that all light that we observe (with exception to the stars at night) is either originating from the Sun or reflected from other celestial objects?

That is not true. For example, a volcanic eruption or a forest fire gives off light all by itself. Are you stupid?

Anyway, God has withdrawn Himself from the Earth after the Fall of Man. Therefore, it is the sun that is now the major source of light, and the ruler of night and day.

Doesn't it seem disingeneous to credit the source of light as being God when it seems evident enough that it's the monstrous fusion reactor of the Sun which is providing it to us?

It is now. It was different during Creation Day 3.

And anyway, the sun is not a "fusion reactor," as "nuclear fusion" is a fairytale straight from the mythology of the science religion. It has never been observed on earth. Why would it then exist on the sun?

True Creation Scientists(tm) realize that the sun is a lump of coal hanging in the sky.

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: Genesis crushes silly Big Bang theory

But if that were the case, then why does God seem to be absent when the sun goes down, yet present when the sun goes up.

That God can be the source of light does not mean he has to be the source of light. It seems to me he delegated that task to the Sun.

Doesn't it seem disingeneous to credit the source of light as being God when it seems evident enough that it's the monstrous fusion reactor of the Sun which is providing it to us?

The Sun is a huge ball of burning coal. Nuclear fusion is a hoax scientist use to steal our money. As is proven by the fact that no one has ever been able to create a viable fusion reactor.

[John Scopes]

Re: Genesis crushes silly Big Bang theory

But if that were the case, then why does God seem to be absent when the sun goes down, yet present when the sun goes up. Or, for that matter, why would it seem that all light that we observe (with exception to the stars at night) is either originating from the Sun or reflected from other celestial objects?

Doesn't it seem disingeneous to credit the source of light as being God when it seems evident enough that it's the monstrous fusion reactor of the Sun which is providing it to us?

Don't forget about bioluninescence my good friend.

[BelieverInGod]

Re: Genesis crushes silly Big Bang theory

Don't forget about bioluninescence my good friend.

You glow in the dark? Maybe you should see one of your doctors about that. Or are you claiming you're an "evolutionary step ahead"?