Re: 3 Experiments You Can Do At Home that PROVE THE EARTH IS FLAT
Of course I am. I spend hours every day helping strangers online in anyway I can. Everyone else comes before myself.
Writing in nonsensical, hard to read ramblings (like the paragraph-long sentence above) makes it impossible to know what you are saying and to continue the thread. It needs to be addressed.
That is exactly why it ISN'T factual. There are no facts. It just shows a bunch of things other people have written. It in no way presents the validity of it. For example, our website is on google. If you type in "proof that the earth is flat", our website is right on the very first page of results. By your logic, it must be factual.
I never said it CAN take over for God, I know it can't. Why not actually read the link and find out what is really being said?
That is pretty stupid. Yes, it has information of Christianity, but it is false, biased information. Here:
Examples of Bias in Wikipedia
Originally posted by -lucian-
View Post
and i dont care what you thought if it was stale and witless, i could say the same for you with your replys, they are in no way related to this topic and therfore, you should be rewarded with infraction points, or are you just going to play god and lay it out on everyone who you think is wrong without looking seriously at the valid facts and points that have been made?
and google is a factual website because it is a search engine, it looks at litterally millions of websites and put the highest rated at the top of the search
i doubt that i can take over god as it would just simply dissapear, that is not a knock at god, im just saying that it would turn into a non-phyical form which nobody could ever use again, so what would be the point of that?
as for wikipedia, how can it be the mothpeice of satan when there are facts about christianity, are you implying that christianity is a form of devil worship?
Examples of Bias in Wikipedia
Comment