Evilution is false - man can not have evolved from monkeys

[Brother Helge]

As we all know, the evilutionist claims that man evolved from monkeys.
But by using simple logic, we can prove that to be false.

Why?

Earth is way to young!

Even the evilutionists say that it took hundreds of thousands of years for monkey to evolve to man.
But the Holy Bible (KJV1611) tells us that earth is approx 6000 years old.

Ergo; Eviloutionism is FALSE!

Praise Jesus!

[Redeemed Papist]

Re: Evilution is false - man can not have evolved from monkeys

This is not a new idea

[Brother Helge]

Re: Evilution is false - man can not have evolved from monkeys

This is not a new idea

And yet it can't be told often enough!

[Redeemed Papist]

Re: Evilution is false - man can not have evolved from monkeys

And yet it can't be told often enough!

Indeed!

PRAISE!



They just can't handle the evidence. They're so thick-headed.

[Tim the plumber]

Re: Evilution is false - man can not have evolved from monkeys

Either the earth is billions of years old and thus the bible is wrong or the world is a few thousands of years old and all of the rocks of the earth have been faked up to show a long geological history, and the sky has been made to look exactly like it goes on for 13 billion years, and the laws of nature are only applicable in this simulated reality, or.....

Maybe the bible was written for ancient people and by the hand (God directed...) so the general backgroud explainating of things in it had to fit into their world view.

Surely the bible should be the source of spiritual and moral guidence not a thorough understanding of physics and geology.

The "study the bible for all that is useful" approach has been tried.

It was when we started to examine nature that the western Europeans got good. Before that Europe was a poor smelly corner of Eurasia. The Mongols did not bother conquering us because we were too poor to bother with. Lucky that.

[Redeemed Papist]

Re: Evilution is false - man can not have evolved from monkeys

Either the earth is billions of years old and thus the bible is wrong or the world is a few thousands of years old and all of the rocks of the earth have been faked up to show a long geological history, and the sky has been made to look exactly like it goes on for 13 billion years, and the laws of nature are only applicable in this simulated reality, or.....

Maybe the bible was written for ancient people and by the hand (God directed...) so the general backgroud explainating of things in it had to fit into their world view.

Surely the bible should be the source of spiritual and moral guidence not a thorough understanding of physics and geology.

.

2 Peter 3:3 Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts,

The Bible IS a source for moral guidance. And there's a clear warning about people like you who spit in Jesus' face; he who temporarily died so you might be saved. And what do you do with that gift? Go around reckoning you understand how God really worked and what God really meant, that's what!

1 Timothy 4:1 Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils;

God saw you coming, friend. I wonder how He did that.

[Tim the plumber]

Re: Evilution is false - man can not have evolved from monkeys

The Bible IS a source for moral guidance. And there's a clear warning about people like you who spit in Jesus' face; he who temporarily died so you might be saved. And what do you do with that gift? Go around reckoning you understand how God really worked and what God really meant, that's what!

Today we build jet air planes. We put satilites in orbit. I design heating systems for houses understanding before the house is built how much heating it will require.

If we had not studied nature then we would not be able to to any of these things.

Just studying the bible will leave you interlectually crippled. Stupid might be a better word.

There is more to human understanding of the world than can be contained in a single book.

If you took a book about quantum physics back to 1AD it would be utterly usless. The people would not have any capacity to understand it.

However if you took a book on how to navigate the oceans then that would have changed history.

There is a lot to learn. More than an ancient Mesopitainian goat herder could possibly cope with. The bible has to fit with the ability of normal people of the time to understand. Not all of us could cope with the navigation thing, there's a lot of maths in it.

Why would you expect the Bible to all of God's work?

[One True Religion]

Re: Evilution is false - man can not have evolved from monkeys

Today we build jet air planes. We put satilites in orbit. I design heating systems for houses understanding before the house is built how much heating it will require.

If we had not studied nature then we would not be able to to any of these things.

Just studying the bible will leave you interlectually crippled. Stupid might be a better word.

There is more to human understanding of the world than can be contained in a single book.

If you took a book about quantum physics back to 1AD it would be utterly usless. The people would not have any capacity to understand it.

However if you took a book on how to navigate the oceans then that would have changed history.

There is a lot to learn. More than an ancient Mesopitainian goat herder could possibly cope with. The bible has to fit with the ability of normal people of the time to understand. Not all of us could cope with the navigation thing, there's a lot of maths in it.

Why would you expect the Bible to all of God's work?

I find your manner of writing extremely hard to understand, I think you are saying that celestial navigation is in some way modern, this is a blatant falsehood. The people who lived in biblical times were hardly all simpletons such as yourself with the inability to reason nor apply mathematics. Consider the architecture and voyages that those ancients completed.

You must have had a most impoverished childhood to so lack logic and faith.

[Tim the plumber]

Re: Evilution is false - man can not have evolved from monkeys

I find your manner of writing extremely hard to understand, I think you are saying that celestial navigation is in some way modern, this is a blatant falsehood. The people who lived in biblical times were hardly all simpletons such as yourself with the inability to reason nor apply mathematics. Consider the architecture and voyages that those ancients completed.

You must have had a most impoverished childhood to so lack logic and faith.

The ability to navigate out of sight of land was the reson the Europeans were able to sail aroud the world in the Renacance of the 15th centuary onwards.

The Romans could not do this. They did not discover America becuse they were unable to navigate.

The could not do very much maths. They could not do calculus. Bit of a problem if you want to describe yourself as an advanced matamatician.

Why do you think we have all the abilities that we do today?

[Redeemed Papist]

Re: Evilution is false - man can not have evolved from monkeys

Just studying the bible will leave you interlectually crippled.

Truly!

[One True Religion]

Re: Evilution is false - man can not have evolved from monkeys

The ability to navigate out of sight of land was the reson the Europeans were able to sail aroud the world in the Renacance of the 15th centuary onwards.

The Romans could not do this. They did not discover America becuse they were unable to navigate.

The could not do very much maths. They could not do calculus. Bit of a problem if you want to describe yourself as an advanced matamatician.

Why do you think we have all the abilities that we do today?

Yet ignorant heathens such as you claim that the vikings discovered, settled and traded with iceland and even popped over to the grand old US of A. You do not understand either side of the argument. Ignorance, when coupled with reticence is a virtue friend.

[Dan U. Holier]

Re: Evilution is false - man can not have evolved from monkeys

...The Romans could not do this. They did not discover America becuse they were unable to navigate.

The could not do very much maths. They could not do calculus...

Can you stop butchering history, logic, geography, grammar and syntax, please? This is more that I can take, seriously.

Nonsensical posting like this would make baby Jesus cry. You’re a cruel person, Joe.

YiC, DUH

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: Evilution is false - man can not have evolved from monkeys

Either the earth is billions of years old and thus the bible is wrong or the world is a few thousands of years old and all of the rocks of the earth have been faked up to show a long geological history, and the sky has been made to look exactly like it goes on for 13 billion years, and the laws of nature are only applicable in this simulated reality, or.....

Satan has certainly ruined your mind. Such is the fate of all demoniacs. The rocks of the earth don't need to be "faked up" when you have bogus dating techniques and dud instruments available!

Maybe the bible was written for ancient people and by the hand (God directed...) so the general backgroud explainating of things in it had to fit into their world view.

No that is not right. When people's perceptions of the world were erroneous God told them they were wrong.

OLD TESTAMENT

JEREMIAH 1
5 Before I formed thee in the bellie, I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the wombe, I sanctified thee, and I ordeined thee a Prophet vnto the nations.
6 Then said I, Ah Lord God, behold, I cannot speake, for I am a childe.
7 But the Lord sayd vnto me, Say not, I am a childe: for thou shalt goe to all that I shall send thee, and whatsoeuer I command thee, thou shalt speake.
©1611

NEW TESTAMENT

LUKE 9
39 And loe, a spirit taketh him, and hee suddenly crieth out, and it teareth him that he fometh againe, and bruising him, hardly departeth from him.
40 And I besought thy disciples to cast him out, and they could not.
41 And Iesus answering, said, O faithlesse, and peruerse generation, how long shal I be with you, and suffer you? bring thy sonne hither.
42 And as he was yet a comming, the deuill threw him downe, and tare him: and Iesus rebuked the vncleane spirit, and healed the child, and deliuered him againe to his father.
©1611

It was when we started to examine nature that the western Europeans got good. Before that Europe was a poor smelly corner of Eurasia.

The post hoc fallacy again. Europe only started to improve once American influence was available. From the 1490's and into the 17th century Europe remained strong smelling (and predominantly Catholic).

When you start trying to "reason" from a false premise, HELL is about the best you can expect. Try some FACTS for a change:

GENESIS 1ff

[Tim the plumber]

Re: Evilution is false - man can not have evolved from monkeys

Yet ignorant heathens such as you claim that the vikings discovered, settled and traded with iceland and even popped over to the grand old US of A. You do not understand either side of the argument. Ignorance, when coupled with reticence is a virtue friend.

I have read one of the "Icelandic Sagas". These histories were written in Norse by the medevil monks of Iceland.

The present population speaks a version of Norse.

The DNA of the people who live in Iceland shows that they have decended from men of Viking stock and predominately women of Irish stock.

Which bit of this do you disbelieve?

Which argument are you talking about?

Ignorance, when coupled with reticence is a virtue friend.

So why do you post at all?

[One True Religion]

Re: Evilution is false - man can not have evolved from monkeys

I have read one of the "Icelandic Sagas". These histories were written in Norse by the medevil monks of Iceland.

The present population speaks a version of Norse.

The DNA of the people who live in Iceland shows that they have decended from men of Viking stock and predominately women of Irish stock.

Which bit of this do you disbelieve?

Which argument are you talking about?


So why do you post at all?

I see you evade the point of vikings using celestial navigation. It is of little point talking to a hellbound heretic such as yourself who speaks in order to impress yet impresses not.

I shall pray for your wicked souls Salvation.