[James Hutchins]

Re: Curiosity Mars "landing" BIGGEST NASA HOAX EVER!!!

If a I take a six foot long stick, hold it next to a man, and the top of the stick is the same height as the man, I know the man is six feet tall. That is the same way mars and the other planets in the upper firmament can be measured. Mars is about the same as a dime, the moon, a quarter and the sun, a bit larger than a nickel. There is no need to sleigh of hand or misdirection. God made things plain and simple.

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: Curiosity Mars "landing" BIGGEST NASA HOAX EVER!!!

Yes, I did. GmM/r2 = mv2/r = mrω = mr(2π/P)2 You should calculate it sometime.

That's not a measurement, that's a calculation. With a small mistake in it, but I will forgive you there as it is irrelevant here. What exactly did you measure and how did you measure it? Without actual facts there can be no conclusions. Methodology does not equal results.

[Jack O'fagan]

Re: Curiosity Mars "landing" BIGGEST NASA HOAX EVER!!!

Yes, I did.

GmM/r2 = mv2/r = mrω = mr(2π/P)2

You should calculate it sometime.

Can you please tell us what G,m,v,M,n,P and r signify and how you yourself gave them a value? or are you working from faith?


YIC

Jack

[Tommy Lunkhead]

Re: Curiosity Mars "landing" BIGGEST NASA HOAX EVER!!!

And no, you did not actually measure either the distance or the size of Mars. All you have is hearsay.

Yes, I did.

GmM/r2 = mv2/r = mrω = mr(2π/P)2

You should calculate it sometime.

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: Curiosity Mars "landing" BIGGEST NASA HOAX EVER!!!

Who says?

I did. This is surprisingly easy to figure out. Just look at the name above the post.

And no, you did not actually measure either the distance or the size of Mars. All you have is hearsay.

[Rev. Edward Clement]

Re: Curiosity Mars "landing" BIGGEST NASA HOAX EVER!!!

GmM/r2 = mv2/r = mrω = mr(2π/P)2

Friend, that is not a tape measure, those are funny looking herogliphics from the slants in communiss Korear.

It appears as though you are now saying that Mars calculated the distance and the sexual word you used, to talk to its relatives; and that is the information that Mars sends back to Nasa to tell Nasa how far away it is from them.

Friend, how long have you been imagining yourself chit-chatting with Mars? How long has Mars been conversing with Nasa in order to recieve sexural objects in the form of skyrocketing fircrackers(that only shoot up to about twenty or thiry feet in the air, btw)? and how long have you beensmoking crack?

Acts
19:35 And when the townclerk had appeased the people, he said, Ye men of Ephesus, what man is there that knoweth not how that the city of the Ephesians is a worshipper of the great goddess Diana, and of the image which fell down from Jupiter?



Your madness is to no avail, here.

Isaiah
54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their righteousness is of me, saith the LORD.

[Jack O'fagan]

Re: Curiosity Mars "landing" BIGGEST NASA HOAX EVER!!!

None of Newtonian Laws have been proven wrong.

Did the Newtonian laws explain the movement of 'Mercury' within the firmament?

YIC

Jack

[Tommy Lunkhead]

Re: Curiosity Mars "landing" BIGGEST NASA HOAX EVER!!!

Ever read Special or General relativity? Clearly the solutions to Newtonian physics in Special or General relativity break down.

Please don't make us atheists look stupid.

I have read and studied Special and General relativity. I'm talking in general. Keeping the same answer, being no. There is no sense in which Newton was proved wrong by Einstein. Objectives at microscopic scale near the speed of light c will have t o take into account time dilation, and General Relativity.

[FreeFromBrains]

Re: Curiosity Mars "landing" BIGGEST NASA HOAX EVER!!!

None of Newtonian Laws have been proven wrong.

Ever read Special or General relativity? Clearly the solutions to Newtonian physics in Special or General relativity break down.

Please don't make us atheists look stupid.

[Tommy Lunkhead]

Re: Curiosity Mars "landing" BIGGEST NASA HOAX EVER!!!

Is that the equation that 'science' has proved wrong?

None of Newtonian Laws have been proven wrong.

[Jack O'fagan]

Re: Curiosity Mars "landing" BIGGEST NASA HOAX EVER!!!

No, but I can give you the equation. This equation is from Newton's laws of gravity.

GmM/r2 = mv2/r = mrω = mr(2π/P)2

Is that the equation that 'science' has proved wrong?

Exodus 23:1 Thou shalt not raise a false report: put not thine hand with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness.


YIC

Jack

[Tommy Lunkhead]

Re: Curiosity Mars "landing" BIGGEST NASA HOAX EVER!!!

Ok, post a pic of the tape measure you used.

No, but I can give you the equation. This equation is from Newton's laws of gravity.

GmM/r2 = mv2/r = mrω = mr(2π/P)2

Do you realize that you're not helping your own case when you say that the Bible did apply to the world at any point?

Yes, I know. However, today, science going through the process of proving religious people wrong and turning lots of people into Atheists.

[Didymus Much]

Re: Curiosity Mars "landing" BIGGEST NASA HOAX EVER!!!

...It's not assumptions, it's mathematics...

No, it's your assumption that Mars is far away so it looks small. Then you say that it looks small because it's far away. That's the circular reasoning you are using.

...Who says?...

Ok, post a pic of the tape measure you used.

...Problem with the Bible, and many other boobs, is that they are outdated, and no longer apply to today's world.

Do you realize that you're not helping your own case when you say that the Bible did apply to the world at any point? If it was true then, it's true now, because the truth never changes.

[Tommy Lunkhead]

Re: Curiosity Mars "landing" BIGGEST NASA HOAX EVER!!!

Your use of needlessly fancy words can not hide the fact that you have no idea what you are talking about.

How do you know it's fact?

Your assumption about how far away Mars...

It's not assumptions, it's mathematics.

(as you never actually measured it)

Who says?

Instead of trying to prove things with unfounded assumptions we use the Holy Bible to get all our indisputable facts!

Fact? Okay, whatever you say Every culture has their own creation stories, and stories that deal with social norms and how to act within society. Problem with the Bible, and many other boobs, is that they are outdated, and no longer apply to today's world.

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: Curiosity Mars "landing" BIGGEST NASA HOAX EVER!!!

It looks like a dime because it's very very far away. You can measure the diurnal parallax of Mars used to make a preliminary calculation of the relative distance to the planet. The parallax is the angle or semi-angle of inclination between two sight-lines to the planet.

Your use of needlessly fancy words can not hide the fact that you have no idea what you are talking about.

Your assumption about how far away Mars is (as you never actually measured it), is the basis for your proof that Mars it is large. But you can not prove anything if you start with an assumption. Next you are going to prove how far away Mars is by assuming Mars is big.

The circular reasoning you are using here is something Christians would never do. Instead of trying to prove things with unfounded assumptions we use the Holy Bible to get all our indisputable facts!