[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: "Nightmare bacteria" disprove evolution.

Humans are complex. We took 2.2 million years to get from our earliest ancestors to where we are now. Homo sapiens (humans) have been around for 250,000 years. Humans evolve slowly. Bacteria have had more time than us humans. Bacteria have lived on earth for approximately 3.5 billion years, more than 1000 times the amount that humans have.

Blah blah blah. None of that is true. How could it be, when it is a well-established fact that God created the earth approximately 6,000 years ago?

[Paragon of virtue]

Re: "Nightmare bacteria" disprove evolution.

Living a life or forming a world view based on "scientific fact" is like building your house on the sand. It's always shifting, and eventually your house will fall down. Build your life on sound Bible principles that last forever. That's building your house on the rock! Many scientists--even Hellbound secular ones--support the sudden appearance of man even using their flawed fossil record. Don't buy into it! This might help:












































If this is too long the pastors can feel free to edit...I'm not too sure about posting a full comic no matter how truthful it is.

[Thomas Taylor]

Re: "Nightmare bacteria" disprove evolution.

Living a life or forming a world view based on "scientific fact" is like building your house on the sand. It's always shifting, and eventually your house will fall down. Build your life on sound Bible principles that last forever. That's building your house on the rock! Many scientists--even Hellbound secular ones--support the sudden appearance of man even using their flawed fossil record. Don't buy into it! This might help:

If this is too long the pastors can feel free to edit...I'm not too sure about posting a full comic no matter how truthful it is.

Paragon, please quote the source for the comic strip.

[BelieverInGod]

Re: "Nightmare bacteria" disprove evolution.

DDT
DDT kills all bugs. I spray down every new employee and burn all their clothes to ensure no bugs.

No employee of mine has ever died from a super bug. Everyone died from a accident involving the combine, falling off a cliff, laziness or bad mouthing Jesus.

DDT is a wonderful spray, and a lot less dangerous, yet more effective than these "organic" sprays that the atheists are fighting for.

The only reason they got rid of DDT is because it "supposedly" caused raptor eggs to break. Since banning DDT, we have had huge outbreaks of insect infestation.

Sad proof that atheists really hate farmers and want them all to go bankrupt and starve.

[Paragon of virtue]

Re: "Nightmare bacteria" disprove evolution.

Paragon, please quote the source for the comic strip.

http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0055/0055_01.asp

There are more tracts @ chick.com than you will ever have time to read, but they are all excellent. There is currently a nice article on the new pope directly on the home page.

[BelieverInGod]

Re: "Nightmare bacteria" disprove evolution.

Most of the evolution process is now a proven theory and has become fact. Natural selection is the 'theory' that *explains* that 'fact'. Any one who denies evolution is an ignorant fool. Anytime science contradicts the bible, you just blame it on Satan.

And exactly which form of "natural selection" has been "proven"? Has an ape given birth to a human? After all we're 99.4% chimpanzee (or is it 97%? 60%, meh I guess it depends on who you ask).

[Basilissa]

Re: "Nightmare bacteria" disprove evolution.

And exactly which form of "natural selection" has been "proven"? Has an ape given birth to a human? After all we're 99.4% chimpanzee (or is it 97%? 60%, meh I guess it depends on who you ask).

We are 0% chimpanzees,after all, these wild animals solve all their social problems either through violence (http://www.economist.com/node/16422404) or sex (http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/...t-love-and-sex), and that is totally unlike us!

Disclaimer: Please excuse the crappiness of these "scientific" links that forcefully compare humans with these wild beasts. Read for yourselves and you will see that we are absolutely NOTHING like that. Animals follow instincts. We follow the Word of God (Joshua 11:6-8).

[BelieverInGod]

Re: "Nightmare bacteria" disprove evolution.

We are 0% chimpanzees,after all, these wild animals solve all their social problems either through violence (http://www.economist.com/node/16422404) or sex (http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/...t-love-and-sex), and that is totally unlike us!

Disclaimer: Please excuse the crappiness of these "scientific" links that forcefully compare humans with these wild beasts. Read for yourselves and you will see that we are absolutely NOTHING like that. Animals follow instincts. We follow the Word of God (Joshua 11:6-8).

And you may want to look at who you're speaking to. I AM A TRUE CHRISTIAN(TM) woman.

I was asking the supposed "intelligent" person what part of natural selection had been proven.

[Basilissa]

Re: "Nightmare bacteria" disprove evolution.

And you may want to look at who you're speaking to. I AM A TRUE CHRISTIAN™ woman.

I was asking the supposed "intelligent" person what part of natural selection had been proven.

I know that you are a True Christian. I should have phrased my words more carefully. I got carried away (I hate all of these beast lovers), and I do apologize.

[BelieverInGod]

Re: "Nightmare bacteria" disprove evolution.

I know that you are a True Christian. I should have phrased my words more carefully. I got carried away (I hate all of these beast lovers), and I do apologize.

No problem, I get sarcastic sometimes because these atheists just spew off what their leaders tell them and do no research.

For example, I look up "how related are we to chimps" and got the following answers on the first page of results.

98.5%
99%
99.6%
Oh wait, this page says we're more related to Gorillas than to chimps 99% Gorilla and 98% chimp with 15% shared (makes sense right? :crazy). I guess if we breed a gorilla and a chimp together we should get a human?
98.5% the same and 2.7% different (yeah that adds up)
95%

The 98.5% number was "discovered" back in 1953 and based on the proteins in the Y-Chromosone. So I guess that means that men are really the ones related? Of course not, it just means that God used "proteins" to build us and chimpanzees (and all other animals as well).

Of course a lot more research has been done, but because it proves that we're more separated from the animals than the above study says, it's pretty much ignored.

I also read an article that said St. Bernard dogs were not genetically related to Newfoundland dogs. Well that's really funny, because if you look at the records of the monks at St. Bernard, when almost all of their dogs were wiped out by distemper back in 1860, Newfoundlanders were one of the breeds they used to rebuild the breed.

I'm not a fan of catholic monks, but I can't see why they would lie about what breeds they used. But who are they to argue against some geneticist.

[Basilissa]

Re: "Nightmare bacteria" disprove evolution.

For example, I look up "how related are we to chimps" and got the following answers on the first page of results.

98.5%
99%
99.6%

99% seems to be the most agreed upon, maybe it means that chimps and gorillas are closely related to the 99% movement? That would explain A LOT!

98.5% the same and 2.7% different (yeah that adds up)

I'm not a fan of catholic monks, but I can't see why they would lie about what breeds they used. But who are they to argue against some geneticist.

Well, the whole genetics thing is the fault of a Catholic monk - the best example to show that monasteries are the source of all evil - including science.

[BelieverInGod]

Re: "Nightmare bacteria" disprove evolution.

Well, the whole genetics thing is the fault of a Catholic monk - the best example to show that monasteries are the source of all evil - including science.

Well really, all Mendel said was like breeds like, which is pretty obvious to most people so I'm not sure how this was a "great scientific advancement".

But the rest of it..... bah..... The further I looked into theories the more I realized none of these experts had any real idea and were just guessing. But when you're getting a degree you don't question your professors, you just shut up and parrot back whatever theory they happen to promote.

[Tool of satan]

Re: "Nightmare bacteria" disprove evolution.

No problem, I get sarcastic sometimes because these atheists just spew off what their leaders tell them and do no research.

For example, I look up "how related are we to chimps" and got the following answers on the first page of results.

98.5%
99%
99.6%
Oh wait, this page says we're more related to Gorillas than to chimps 99% Gorilla and 98% chimp with 15% shared (makes sense right? :crazy). I guess if we breed a gorilla and a chimp together we should get a human?
98.5% the same and 2.7% different (yeah that adds up)
95%

"the data confirms that humans and chimps are indeed the most closely related — we share 99% of our DNA, compared to 98% with gorillas and 97% with orangutans"

Direct quote from your link. This would probably be more useful than misreading things and putting up the wrong information.

The human genome = 1 thing, or 100%
15% of the human genome is more similar to part of a gorilla's genome than part of a chimp's genome. 15% of the chimp's genome is more similar to the gorilla's and there's some poor wording at this point. Nowhere does it say that humans are more closely related to gorillas.
All it takes is a little reading comprehension.

The 98.5% number was "discovered" back in 1953 and based on the proteins in the Y-Chromosone. So I guess that means that men are really the ones related? Of course not, it just means that God used "proteins" to build us and chimpanzees (and all other animals as well).

Of course a lot more research has been done, but because it proves that we're more separated from the animals than the above study says, it's pretty much ignored.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/09/0924_020924_dnachimp.html

Some people call new research progress.

I also read an article that said St. Bernard dogs were not genetically related to Newfoundland dogs. Well that's really funny, because if you look at the records of the monks at St. Bernard, when almost all of their dogs were wiped out by distemper back in 1860, Newfoundlanders were one of the breeds they used to rebuild the breed.

I'm not a fan of catholic monks, but I can't see why they would lie about what breeds they used. But who are they to argue against some geneticist.

Link to the article?

[BelieverInGod]

Re: "Nightmare bacteria" disprove evolution.

[QUOTE=Tool of satan;986148]"the data confirms that humans and chimps are indeed the most closely related — we share 99% of our DNA, compared to 98% with gorillas and 97% with orangutans"

Direct quote from your link. This would probably be more useful than misreading things and putting up the wrong information.

The human genome = 1 thing, or 100%
15% of the human genome is more similar to part of a gorilla's genome than part of a chimp's genome. 15% of the chimp's genome is more similar to the gorilla's and there's some poor wording at this point. Nowhere does it say that humans are more closely related to gorillas.
All it takes is a little reading comprehension.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/09/0924_020924_dnachimp.html

Some people call new research progress.[quote]

Ah, so now the scientists are wrong because you say so. I always love how you guys do that. I mean we had one "expert" on here that said we weren't related to apes at all. Hold it, was that you? Did you change your name and theory again?

Humans didnt evolve from apes - we both share a common ancestor whos evolutionary path split giving us humans and apes

I just love how you guys all come on here with different "truths" and tell us that your "truth" is better than all the other "truths" even though science is always changing.

Sorry, but there is only one "truth" that I trust in.

Psalm 25:10 All the paths of the Lord are mercy and truth unto such as keep his covenant and his testimonies.

Link to the article?

Is your internet broken? I'm not going to waste my time looking up garbage for you. The "study" was some idiots genetics dissertation and the breeding is common knowledge in the dog world.

But genetics is ALWAYS right, right? After all, C.C. is identical to Rainbow, right?

[Tool of satan]

Re: "Nightmare bacteria" disprove evolution.

Ah, so now the scientists are wrong because you say so. I always love how you guys do that. I mean we had one "expert" on here that said we weren't related to apes at all. Hold it, was that you? Did you change your name and theory again?
I just love how you guys all come on here with different "truths" and tell us that your "truth" is better than all the other "truths" even though science is always changing.

Again, all it takes is a little reading. Reading isn't a sin, is it?
He said that humans didn't evolve from apes, not that they aren't related. This is true depending on how you classify apes. Which means: would you consider the common ancestor an ape? If not, then no, humans didn't evolve from apes.
Also, he might've meant modern apes.

Is your internet broken? I'm not going to waste my time looking up garbage for you. The "study" was some idiots genetics dissertation and the breeding is common knowledge in the dog world.

Why are you criticizing some idiot's study as if it were a fact?

But genetics is ALWAYS right, right? After all, C.C. is identical to Rainbow, right?

They aren't identical. People know why they aren't identical. Why don't you?