Re: False Religions And Cults
Your "scientific method" is not something endorsed in The Bible where it's identified as foolishness. But method or not, in its own terms the second link is meaningless. In the following excerpt I will highlight the salient items in yellow.
In summary, then, there's strong evidence that alcoholic drinks probably increase risk but no threshold could be identified.
No threshold means anything from a drop of Angostura bitters in fizzy water with a slice of lemon (quite refreshing) to that vintage Sauternes with your afternoon trifle or even a pint of Cocoroco before breakfast. Who knows? No threshold was identified.
Probable means that although any amount of Alcoholic drinks may or may not have an effect it also may or may not have no effect.
Could anything get more vague?
Yes.
THE BLUE SECTON
This is the blue section. It's the same chart which you can read again if you'd like but this time I'm highlighting something different. In yellow as before but with blue writing.
That's right. Just when you thought it couldn't get any more nebulous up pop the culturally defined diets with LIMITED EVIDENCE that no conclusion could be drawn regarding risk factors. Let's start with France. Their culture defines a diet where wine is served to all family members regardless of age. Are French people at a greater or lesser risk level?
Betel nut. Not something I'm likely to include in a salad because it's not part of the diet my culture defines. It is. considered risky however and banned as an import in many countries. Is it risky for people whose culture defines the stuff as a valid dietary component?
Without dwelling on places where poisonous berries are consumed or toadstools or toxic fish, all within the aegis of a culturally defined diet, according to our source the level of risk is inconclusive and based on limited evidence even if it's 100% certain for anyone else to get cancer of everything.
The Bible was right.
____________
THE LINK.-. https://www.wcrf.org/dietandcancer/breast-cancer
THE CHART https://www.wcrf.org/sites/default/files/Premenopausal-breast-cancer-matrix.png
Originally posted by Dolores de Barriga
View Post
- | - | DECREASES RISK | ..INCREASES RISK.. |
---|---|---|---|
.STRONG .EVIDENCE.. | .Probable––.–– | .Vigorous physical activity. | .Alcoholic drinks![]() |
.LIMITED .EVIDENCE.. | .Limited – .no.conclusion. | .Cereals (grains) and their products; dietary fibre; .potatoes; non-starchy vegetables (ER+ breast cancers); .fruits; pulses (legumes); soya and soya products; red .and processed meat; poultry; fish; eggs; fats and .oils; total fat; vegetable fat; fatty acid composition; .saturated fatty acids; mono-unsaturated fatty acids; .polyunsaturated fatty acids; trans-fatty acids; cholesterol; .sugar (sucrose); other sugars; sugary foods and drinks; .coffee; tea; carbohydrate; starch; glycaemic index; .glycaemic load; protein; vitamin A; riboflavin; vitamin .B6; folate; vitamin B12; vitamin C; vitamin D; vitamin E; .calcium supplements; iron; selenium; phytoestrogens; .isoflavones; dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene; .dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane; dieldrin; .hexachlorobenzene; hexachlorocyclohexane; trans- .nonachlor; polychlorinated biphenyls; acrylamide; dietary .patterns; culturally defined diets; sedentary behaviour; .adult weight gain; energy intake |
.4...No threshold was identified.............................................–.... ...................... |
No threshold means anything from a drop of Angostura bitters in fizzy water with a slice of lemon (quite refreshing) to that vintage Sauternes with your afternoon trifle or even a pint of Cocoroco before breakfast. Who knows? No threshold was identified.
Probable means that although any amount of Alcoholic drinks may or may not have an effect it also may or may not have no effect.
Could anything get more vague?
Yes.
THE BLUE SECTON
This is the blue section. It's the same chart which you can read again if you'd like but this time I'm highlighting something different. In yellow as before but with blue writing.
- | - | DECREASES RISK | ..INCREASES RISK.. |
---|---|---|---|
.STRONG .EVIDENCE.. | .Probable––.–– | .Vigorous physical activity. | .Alcoholic drinks![]() |
.LIMITED–. .EVIDENCE.. | .Limited – .no.conclusion. | .Cereals (grains) and their products; dietary fibre; .potatoes; non-starchy vegetables (ER+ breast cancers); .fruits; pulses (legumes); soya and soya products; red .and processed meat; poultry; fish; eggs; fats and .oils; total fat; vegetable fat; fatty acid composition; .saturated fatty acids; mono-unsaturated fatty acids; .polyunsaturated fatty acids; trans-fatty acids; cholesterol; .sugar (sucrose); other sugars; sugary foods and drinks; .coffee; tea; carbohydrate; starch; glycaemic index; .glycaemic load; protein; vitamin A; riboflavin; vitamin .B6; folate; vitamin B12; vitamin C; vitamin D; vitamin E; .calcium supplements; iron; selenium; phytoestrogens; .isoflavones; dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene; .dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane; dieldrin; .hexachlorobenzene; hexachlorocyclohexane; trans- .nonachlor; polychlorinated biphenyls; acrylamide; dietary .patterns; culturally defined diets; sedentary behaviour; .adult weigh; energy intake |
.4...No threshold was identified.............................................–.... ...................... |
That's right. Just when you thought it couldn't get any more nebulous up pop the culturally defined diets with LIMITED EVIDENCE that no conclusion could be drawn regarding risk factors. Let's start with France. Their culture defines a diet where wine is served to all family members regardless of age. Are French people at a greater or lesser risk level?
Betel nut. Not something I'm likely to include in a salad because it's not part of the diet my culture defines. It is. considered risky however and banned as an import in many countries. Is it risky for people whose culture defines the stuff as a valid dietary component?
Without dwelling on places where poisonous berries are consumed or toadstools or toxic fish, all within the aegis of a culturally defined diet, according to our source the level of risk is inconclusive and based on limited evidence even if it's 100% certain for anyone else to get cancer of everything.
The Bible was right.
I Corinthians 3:19 The wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness.
____________
THE LINK.-. https://www.wcrf.org/dietandcancer/breast-cancer
THE CHART https://www.wcrf.org/sites/default/files/Premenopausal-breast-cancer-matrix.png
Comment