Tweet
Friends, it's rare that I read a news item which gets my dander up as much as this one did:
Mother raped own daughter for "sex education."
This is outrageous! If any child of mine pestered me with "repeated questions" about sex, I would lay a Godly beating on them with a rod; that's just good parenting. Such discipline should always be swift and physically painful, but there should never be any type of sexual component to it!*
Judge John Robertson said sexual offenses against children by their own mothers were "rare," describing the relationship between mother and child as "seminal in our society."
I guess they do things differently in Australia, 'cause I'm quite certain no judge in the US** would ever use such a disgusting word in open court, much less use it to describe the relationship between mother and child. Kind of makes me wonder whether this judge should even be presiding over a case of this nature.
He told the woman she had "no psychological or intellectual reason to explain this shocking behavior," as she had "a normal loving upbringing with parents and family who still support you."
And now we come to the crux of the matter! Is it any wonder this woman turned out wrong, what with her parents supporting her? Once a woman is of childbearing age, it's the job of her husband to support her! Giving one red cent to your adult daughter is just stupid; you might as well drive her to the liquor store and put the booze on your credit card, because the end result will be the same.
The court heard that the woman started seeing the father of her four children — 16 years her senior — when she was "virtually a child" at age 14. She had her first child at 16.
She later began a cyber-sex relationship with a man and "became obsessed with sex." She would allow her daughter to view sexual videos the two sent to each other.
"From the start you characterized your behavior as some form of bizarre sex education with the child which did not involve sexual gratification from you... You were obsessed with sex and your life was in chaos," Robertson reportedly said.
He also said the mother, through her "selfish criminal conduct," had deprived her daughter of the right to "a wholesome and loving relationship with her mother."
I think the real criminal in all this is Australia's notoriously liberal pre-school system. Do you think that little girl would have been getting her mom all inflamed with impure thoughts if she hadn't been hearing about those things at school?
The Bible is very clear on this subject:
You all know I'm a 1611 King James Bible believer through and through, but I think it's worth noting that the ESV translates the above verse as "Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin..."
And that's exactly what the "anything-goes, do-it-if-it-feels-good" Australian school system did to that poor little girl. They filled her mind with sinful thoughts, and she paid a heck of a price for their misconduct.
Next time somebody asks you why you support abstinence-only sex education, please feel free to link to this thread.
*Note that when I say corporal punishment should never have any sexual component to it, I obviously don't mean to imply that a child's genitals should be excluded from a good beating, especially in cases where the child has been excessively touching itself "down there."
**Unless, of course, if we're talking about a Supreme Court justice appointed by Clinton or Obama.
Mother raped own daughter for "sex education."
A mother of four who raped her 11-year-old daughter and filmed it as a form of "sex education" has been jailed for four years in Australia.
The 37-year-old woman from Queensland's Sunshine Coast made three films using her mobile phone showing her raping her youngest child and exposed her to other sexual activity "in response to repeated questions," The Sunshine Daily reported.
The 37-year-old woman from Queensland's Sunshine Coast made three films using her mobile phone showing her raping her youngest child and exposed her to other sexual activity "in response to repeated questions," The Sunshine Daily reported.
Judge John Robertson said sexual offenses against children by their own mothers were "rare," describing the relationship between mother and child as "seminal in our society."
He told the woman she had "no psychological or intellectual reason to explain this shocking behavior," as she had "a normal loving upbringing with parents and family who still support you."
The court heard that the woman started seeing the father of her four children — 16 years her senior — when she was "virtually a child" at age 14. She had her first child at 16.
She later began a cyber-sex relationship with a man and "became obsessed with sex." She would allow her daughter to view sexual videos the two sent to each other.
"From the start you characterized your behavior as some form of bizarre sex education with the child which did not involve sexual gratification from you... You were obsessed with sex and your life was in chaos," Robertson reportedly said.
He also said the mother, through her "selfish criminal conduct," had deprived her daughter of the right to "a wholesome and loving relationship with her mother."
I think the real criminal in all this is Australia's notoriously liberal pre-school system. Do you think that little girl would have been getting her mom all inflamed with impure thoughts if she hadn't been hearing about those things at school?
The Bible is very clear on this subject:
Mark 9:42
42And whosoever shall offend one of these little ones that believe in me, it is better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he were cast into the sea.
42And whosoever shall offend one of these little ones that believe in me, it is better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he were cast into the sea.
And that's exactly what the "anything-goes, do-it-if-it-feels-good" Australian school system did to that poor little girl. They filled her mind with sinful thoughts, and she paid a heck of a price for their misconduct.
Next time somebody asks you why you support abstinence-only sex education, please feel free to link to this thread.
*Note that when I say corporal punishment should never have any sexual component to it, I obviously don't mean to imply that a child's genitals should be excluded from a good beating, especially in cases where the child has been excessively touching itself "down there."
**Unless, of course, if we're talking about a Supreme Court justice appointed by Clinton or Obama.
Comment