The LORD tells us marriage is between one man and one woman (Genesis 2:24), one man and his wives (Genesis 4:19; 26:34; 31:17; Exodus 21:10; Deuteronomy 21:15; Judges 8:30; 1 Samuel 1:1-2; 1 Chronicles 4:5), one man and his wives and his concubines (Genesis 25:6; 1 Kings 11:2-3; 2 Chronicles 11:21), one man and his wife and her property (Genesis 16:1-4), one man and his brother's widow (Genesis 38:6-10), one man and the woman he rapes (Deuteronomy 22:28-29), one man who is a soldier for the LORD and his prisoners of war (Numbers 31: 1-18; Deuteronomy 21:11-14), one man and the child slave his father purchases at a fair price (Exodus 21:7-11).
How can we definitively say Jesus didn't mean for marriage eventually to be between a man, his third wife, and several porn stars? I think maybe Jesus led President Trump to pay Stormy Daniels to be quiet because He knew the liberals would take it the wrong way and turn it into something it's not. We should not test the LORD by demanding answers to irrelevant questions like why He would personally put someone who likes to get spanked with a rolled up magazine with his face on the cover by a porn star who reminds him of his daughter while his third wife is at home caring for their 4 month old baby in office. It's not like she was a he. I mean, let's keep it in perspective here.
How can we definitively say Jesus didn't mean for marriage eventually to be between a man, his third wife, and several porn stars? I think maybe Jesus led President Trump to pay Stormy Daniels to be quiet because He knew the liberals would take it the wrong way and turn it into something it's not. We should not test the LORD by demanding answers to irrelevant questions like why He would personally put someone who likes to get spanked with a rolled up magazine with his face on the cover by a porn star who reminds him of his daughter while his third wife is at home caring for their 4 month old baby in office. It's not like she was a he. I mean, let's keep it in perspective here.



)-- but only women with no protective or moral affiliation with a man could be allowed to "ply the trade", so to speak. Any woman with a husband or father or brother to disgrace would be subject to swift and severe punishment, which was Judah's point when he pronounced judgment over his DIL..gif)

Comment