X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pastor Isaac Peters
    Senior Pastor
    Ex-liberal; converted to True Christianity™
    Always Biblically correct
    True Christian™
    • Sep 2006
    • 10639

    #1

    Between 61% and 98.2% of historians are baby-eating jihadists.

    The ivory-tower eggheads are never satisified. First they denied Genesis by coming up with the Darwinist monkey cult. Then they denied the entire Bible with their "higher criticism" (more like presuming to criticize God on high). Now they even deny the tangible evidence of God's love and grace, our Divinely hand-picked President.

    Satanic link: Do not click unless your tithing is up to date.
    In an informal survey of 109 professional historians conducted over a three-week period through the History News Network, 98.2 percent assessed the presidency of Mr. Bush to be a failure while 1.8 percent classified it as a success.

    [pornographic image deleted to protect Christian modesty]

    Asked to rank the presidency of George W. Bush in comparison to those of the other 41 American presidents, more than 61 percent of the historians concluded that the current presidency is the worst in the nation’s history. Another 35 percent of the historians surveyed rated the Bush presidency in the 31st to 41st category, while only four of the 109 respondents ranked the current presidency as even among the top two-thirds of American administrations.
    The conclusion is inescapable: Historians hate Jesus, America, and everything good.
    This church is dedicated to preaching True Christianity™ and the King James Bible exactly as they are, with no alterations to make them more politically correct for modern liberals. If you think that we've misquoted or twisted Scripture or quoted any verse out of context, please explain in detail how we've done so. Otherwise, if what you read on this site offends you, then you're offended by Almighty God and His Word, not by us.

    Questions to ask liberal "Christians"Things that the Bible doesn't sayTolerance

    sigpic
  • Ezekiel Bathfire
    Pastor for Diversity and Tolerance
    Christ's Rottweiler
     
    • Jan 2008
    • 22879

    #2
    Re: Between 61% and 98.2% of historians are baby-eating jihadists

    Originally posted by Pastor Isaac Peters View Post
    The ivory-tower eggheads are never satisified. First they denied Genesis by coming up with the Darwinist monkey cult. Then they denied the entire Bible with their "higher criticism" (more like presuming to criticize God on high). Now they even deny the tangible evidence of God's love and grace, our Divinely hand-picked President.

    Satanic link: Do not click unless your tithing is up to date.The conclusion is inescapable: Historians hate Jesus, America, and everything good.
    Have the DoF do a background check on those "historians" - Im looking at them being Demoncrats to a man.
    sigpic


    “We must reassert that the essence of Christianity is the love of obedience to God’s Laws and that how that complete obedience is used or implemented does not concern us.”

    Author of such illuminating essays as,
    Map of the Known World; Periodic Table of Elements; The History of Linguistics; The Errors of Wicca; Dolphins and Evolution; The History of Landover (The Apology); Landover and the Civil War; 2000 Racial Slurs.

    Comment

    • One-eyed Jack
      True Christian™
      True Christian™
      • Nov 2007
      • 1092

      #3
      Re: Between 61% and 98.2% of historians are baby-eating jihadists

      These are horrible men.

      Historian 1: "No individual president can compare to the second Bush. Glib, contemptuous, ignorant, incurious, a dupe of anyone who humors his deluded belief in his heroic self, he has bankrupted the country with his disastrous war and his tax breaks for the rich..."

      Historian 2: "With his unprovoked and disastrous war of aggression in Iraq and his monstrous deficits, Bush has set this country on a course that will take decades to correct..."

      Historian 3: "...the paranoia of Nixon, the ethics of Harding and the good sense of Herbert Hoover. . . . . God willing, this will go down as the nadir of American politics."

      Historian 4: "He is not a conservative, nor a Christian, just an immoral man..."

      Historian 5: "He knows how to make the very rich very much richer, and he has an amazing talent for f**king up everything else he even approaches. His administration has been the most reckless, dangerous, irresponsible, mendacious, arrogant, self-righteous, incompetent, and deeply corrupt one in all of American history."
      These boys need to go to Guantanamo for a few sessions on the "Rumsfeld Bathing Board"!

      God's President, right or wrong!

      ~~ OEJ

      Comment

      • Bobby-Joe
        Landover Security Superviser
        Asset Loss Prevention and Personal Security Expert
        NOT angry and positively NOT Gay
        True Christian™
        • Sep 2006
        • 18405

        #4
        Re: Between 61% and 98.2% of historians are baby-eating jihadists

        Christians have long been aware of perverted reasoning of Historians. This attack on our GREATEST President GW Bush is just typical of people who have slandered other great Americans like Herbert Hoover and Jefferson Davis. You listen them you would think blacks and immigrants are only allowed into this country to be exploited and persecuted.

        Time to reclaim our FREEDOM from the “Mullah in Chief” and his growing activist voter hoards of socialists, communists, anti-Semites, anti-Christians, atheists, radical gays and lesbians, feminists, illegal immigrants, Muslims, anti-Anglo whites and others.

        Hot Must ReadThreads!


        Time to come clean on Benghazi Mr Obama!

        Comment

        • Brother Temperance
          Senior Usher
          True Christian™ missionary to the Unsaved Kingdom
          A very nice young man
          True Christian™
          • Sep 2006
          • 15621

          #5
          Re: Between 61% and 98.2% of historians are baby-eating jihadists

          I've never trusted historians. What's with all this "examining sources" malarkey? If you want to know about what happened in the past, read the Bible. Simple as that.
          O Lord our God, help us to tear their soldiers to bloody shreds with our shells; help us to cover their smiling fields with the pale forms of their patriot dead; help us to drown the thunder of the guns with the shrieks of their wounded, writhing in pain; help us to lay waste their humble homes with a hurricane of fire; help us to wring the hearts of their unoffending widows with unavailing grief; help us to turn them out roofless with little children to wander unfriended the wastes of their desolated land in rags and hunger and thirst, sports of the sun flames of summer and the icy winds of winter, broken in spirit, worn with travail, imploring Thee for the refuge of the grave and denied it--for our sakes who adore Thee, Lord, blast their hopes, blight their lives, protract their bitter pilgrimage, make heavy their steps, water their way with their tears, stain the white snow with the blood of their wounded feet! We ask it, in the spirit of love, of Him Who is the Source of Love, and Who is the ever-faithful refuge and friend of all that are sore beset and seek His aid with humble and contrite hearts. Amen.



          God being truth, justice, goodness, beauty, power, and life, man is falsehood, iniquity, evil, ugliness, impotence, and death. God being master, man is the slave. Incapable of finding justice, truth, and eternal life by his own effort, he can attain them only through a divine revelation... he who desires to worship God must harbor no childish illusions about the matter, but bravely renounce his liberty and humanity.

          Comment

          • Larry Lee
            Predestinated Servant of Jesus Christ by the Will of God
            True Christian™ Theologian
            True Christian™
            • Sep 2006
            • 4464

            #6
            Re: Between 61% and 98.2% of historians are baby-eating jihadists

            Originally posted by One-eyed Jack View Post
            Historian 1: "No individual president can compare to the second Bush. Glib, contemptuous, ignorant, incurious, a dupe of anyone who humors his deluded belief in his heroic self, he has bankrupted the country with his disastrous war and his tax breaks for the rich..."

            Historian 2: "With his unprovoked and disastrous war of aggression in Iraq and his monstrous deficits, Bush has set this country on a course that will take decades to correct..."

            Historian 3: "...the paranoia of Nixon, the ethics of Harding and the good sense of Herbert Hoover. . . . . God willing, this will go down as the nadir of American politics."

            Historian 4: "He is not a conservative, nor a Christian, just an immoral man..."

            Historian 5: "He knows how to make the very rich very much richer, and he has an amazing talent for f**king up everything else he even approaches. His administration has been the most reckless, dangerous, irresponsible, mendacious, arrogant, self-righteous, incompetent, and deeply corrupt one in all of American history."
            ~~ OEJ
            Those are truly terrible things to say about our Godly President. I think I'm now cured of reading any history for a very long time, Praise God.
            sigpic

            I loved Newt before Newt was invincible

            Comment

            Working...